Benchmark: Public safety

If you’re on the fence about staying in Detroit or moving out, there’s an absurd and irrational sort of calculus you do when it comes to crime.

First, there are the numbers. The most recent FBI statistics suggest things are moving in a good direction. Violent crime is down, although not enough to knock Detroit off those “most dangerous cities” lists. New York City last year, with 8.4 million people, reported the same number of homicides as Detroit, which the Census Bureau now puts at 688,000 residents.

The Detroit Police Department, under the control of Emergency Manager Kevyn Orr, says it’s improving things. Police Chief James Craig has set a goal this year of cutting 911 response times to five minutes for high-priority calls, and says the average response time now is between eight and 11 minutes – a dramatic improvement over the 58 minutes average response time for high-priority calls in 2013. And he says the department is doing a better job of solving murder cases.

But there’s more to the equation than just the numbers.

I’ve lived in Detroit for the last 15 years. When I moved here, I knew that living in a city raised my chances of being a victim of crime. But the benefits, I thought, outweighed those risks. I loved – still love – the energy of the city, the history, the people.

Then I had two kids. And the calculus changed.

A holdup, a mugging, a break-in

I live in a tight-knit neighborhood on the city’s northwest side. We all look out for each other, and when someone’s car gets stolen or a neighbor gets robbed, news travels quickly.

Within the past several months, there have been three troubling incidents that hit too close to home.

Back in December, I heard about a terrifying incident that happened right around the corner from my house. Two of my neighbors were walking their dogs, like they did early every morning.

A car pulled up alongside them. A man got out, and pointed the barrel of his shotgun between Cathy’s eyes. He demanded money. “We don’t have money, we’re out walking our dogs,” Cathy told him. He became agitated. He threatened to shoot the dogs, and kill them. Cathy says she tried to push her house key deep into her pocket. She was afraid he’d demand to go into her house across the street, where her kids were sleeping.

When I moved here, I knew that living in a city raised my chances of being a victim of crime. But the benefits, I thought, outweighed those risks...Then I had two kids. And the calculus changed.

Cathy escaped the holdup unharmed, physically. But after 19 years in the neighborhood – where she volunteered for just about every community event, coached soccer, and raised money for the neighborhood – she put her house on the market almost immediately.

She moved on February 1.

That very same day, my 81-year-old neighbor was mugged in her driveway.

And a few months later, I was at home on the computer when a friend sent me a link to a news story. “Isn’t this near your house?” she asked. It was a story about a home invasion. There was a shootout, and one of the suspects was killed. It happened a dozen houses away from mine.

A big question for my family

When it comes to crime, there are two kinds of conversations Detroiters tend to have.

The first kind is with the people who don’t understand why anyone would live in Detroit. In those conversations, I probably won’t talk about our car that got stolen, or the rock that came sailing through our dining room window one evening. I figure I don’t need to confirm your worst ideas about the city I call home.

And then there are the conversations we have at our dining room tables, with our neighbors or spouses.

I’ve had several of those conversations with my husband, Brian. We talk about those too-close-to-home incidents, and I ask him: What’s the first thing that goes through your mind when crime happens close to us?

“That I’m crazy for living here with my family,” he tells me. “And I wonder, what am I doing? I need to do something about it. I need to move before something happens. Because if I don’t and something happens, I just… I don’t know how I could live with that.”

And then things settle down, and the weeks are flying by, and pretty soon it’s been another year.

And a lot of the time – even most of the time – I’m really glad we’re raising our daughters in Detroit. I feel like they’re getting rich cultural experiences. I like that they’re around kids from families with different backgrounds and perspectives. And we want our girls to grow up with a sense of responsibility to their community, to believe that you don’t just leave because things aren’t perfect, or easy.

But with every frightening story I hear, it gets harder to do that calculus and still arrive at the conclusion that the correct answer, for us, is to stay.

Support for the Detroit Journalism Cooperative on Michigan Radio comes from the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, Renaissance Journalism's Michigan Reporting Initiative, and the Ford Foundation.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Phil Cody
Thu, 06/26/2014 - 11:13am
Sarah, your dilemma is all too familiar. I had similiar experiences 35 years ago when I lived in Highland Park. The pattern of crime escalates from vandalism (a rock was thrown thru my picture window), to property crimes, to street crime after I was almost a victim of an attempted strong arm robbery. I lost all sense of security after my home was broken into for the 3rd time. I moved to Farmington Hills. That was my calculus. You need to get a more complete picture of your neighborhood's crime level from the police district to fully appreciate the risk level. Then you can re-do your "calculus" and arrive at the answer to your question " Should we stay?".
Thu, 06/26/2014 - 12:23pm
The Detroit Police Department has a Detroit Neighborhood Police Officers' Conference this Saturday, June 28 at University of Detroit Mercy. Take a day to learn more about how you can help yourself, your neighbors and the city with information that will pay off well in to the future. For more information go to
Brenda Moore
Thu, 06/26/2014 - 2:44pm
Sarah. I think if you peruse the 'safe cities' in America, it might help you to understand why Detroit is predisposed to violence and how implementing some of the principals of safe cities can help turn the city around. Without citing anti-social norms, we probably both agree that Detroit is a city of 'haves and have nots'. Argubly, there is no excuse for attacking the 'haves.' However impoverished people lack hope and feel undervalued. Consequently they react by venting their anger on we who are doing well. I do believe in the city's transformation. However it will take time. Perhaps if our city officials studied the methodologies used in America's 'safe cities' we can learn and adapt using their strategies as a catalyst for change in Detroit. Just a thought.
Thu, 06/26/2014 - 10:43pm
Ridiculous. There is no correlation between the have nots....whatever that is and the haves... whatever that is. From the beginning criminals are not necessarily from poor backgrounds many come from middle class backgrounds. And often those that are poor are not criminals.You are perpetuating a myth.The myth that the allegedly disenfranchised must lash out at those with more. By the way many of the have nots have premium cable, smart phones late model auto mobiles etc etc...hardly have nots. The above article even described a crime where the armed robber had an that a have not? It is insulting to everyone. It is disappointing that you immediately make excuses....again I ask is a shotgun wielding person with a car a have not? Cars cost money shotguns do too...... Mostly these are low lifes that go thru life cheating , manipulating and causing heart ache and damage to society and often their own good families.The only way this will ever change in a profound way is when we i.e. society stops making excuses based on unfounded myths for these parasites.
John S.
Sun, 06/29/2014 - 12:05pm
The author's narrative no doubt applies to tens of thousands of middle class city residents. With a steady shrinking of the middle class population, there are likely fewer good targets for the small but nonetheless troublesome population of thugs and would be thugs (juveniles) in the city who make their living from crime. Perhaps the DPD should conduct a study using its GIS capabilities to determine if violent and property crimes are diffusing into the city's better and more stable middle class neighborhoods.