Michigan population shrinks

State Demographer Ken Darga reports that the most recent population estimates are out -- showing changes among the states from 2010 to 2011. The news for Michigan will play negatively.

The state lost 7,400 people in the period, about the equivalent of the city of Houghton.

Michigan was one of only three states (Rhode Island and Maine the others) to shrink in the period -- and had the largest loss in raw numbers.

By contrast, Texas and California combined to add nearly 1 million people in the time period.

OK. But, for all intents and purposes, Michigan is essentially the same state it was in 2000, with almost 9.9 million calling Michigan home.

As I recall, the mood was fairly in optimistic in 2000 -- and certainly more optimistic than you hear from many these days. Is staying the same size an indictment of Michigan's future?

I don't think so. The truly worrisome numbers involve money, not people.

In 2000, the per capita income in Michigan was $29,397. The national average then was $30,318.

In 2010, the number in Michigan was $35,624. The national average was $40,504.

In 2010, 17 states and the District of Columbia had higher per-capita averages. In 2010, 34 states and DC had higher averages.

Figuring out how to improve the incomes of the people who stay in Michigan, not any overall head counts, is THE issue for the next five years.

The state of Michigan maintains an impressive array of charts and figures here. Take some time and look them over.

Like what you’re reading in Bridge? Please consider a donation to support our work!

We are a nonprofit Michigan news site focused on issues that impact all citizens. In an era of click bait and biased news, we focus on taking the time to learn both sides of a story before we post it. Bridge stories are always free, but our work costs money. If our journalism helps you understand and love Michigan more, please consider supporting our work. It takes just a moment to donate here.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Comments

Thu, 01/05/2012 - 4:32pm
is this a typo was first stat supposed to be from 2000 not 2010? "In 2010, 17 states and the District of Columbia had higher per-capita averages. In 2010, 34 states and DC had higher averages."