Guest commentary: Michigan leaders recognize the wisdom of investing in preschoolers

By Debbie Dingell and Doug Luciani/Children’s Leadership Council of Michigan

We tip our hats to Michigan’s governor and the Legislature for funding expansion of the state’s Great Start Readiness Program. This program offers high-quality preschool to needy families of 4-year-olds.

Culturally and scientifically, evidence abounds that nurturing and investing in children before they reach kindergarten pays extraordinary dividends. For each dollar spent on early education and care, there are $7 of savings in grade repetition, social welfare and corrections. Expanding pre-K can save $100 million in special education costs and the high cost of kindergarten repetition. Business leaders – people who think about returns on investment – strongly support public and private investments in the building of talent.

We business leaders care deeply about guiding our K-12 and higher education institutions toward excellence and investing in them in smart ways.

We also understand that the earlier we invest in our state’s children, the greater the return. Along with our business colleagues throughout Michigan, we have asked our state officials to put a high priority on early education and care. They have.

The governor and Legislature are behind getting children from all families, regardless of income, into high-quality preschool programs. We support them and applaud them, regardless of their political affiliation. They are leaving a lasting legacy to Michigan, its children and its economic future.

We’re not blind to the partisan and ideological gulfs. But an issue like early childhood investment – where the payback is so high – is a slam dunk. Smart investments benefit us all.

Tots count. They will pursue the education they need and eventually enter our workplaces. The better their start, the better off they, and we, will be.

To the rest of us: Please follow Michigan’s policy leadership and invest in our state’s children now.


Bridge welcomes guest columns from a diverse range of people on issues relating to Michigan and its future. The views and assertions of these writers do not necessarily reflect those of Bridge or The Center for Michigan. Bridge does not endorse any individual guest commentary submission.

If you are interested in submitting a guest commentary, please contact Monica WilliamsClick here for details and submission guidelines.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Thu, 05/30/2013 - 11:08am
"– where the payback is so high – is a slam dunk" Those are great claims, but are they going to be verified or is this simply make the claims and spend the money? Are there any metrics of performance for the programs and how they are administered or is this another 'good intentions' to spend other people's money with no interest in accountability like the rest of the State education system?