Skip to main content
Bridge Michigan
Michigan’s nonpartisan, nonprofit news source

Michigan Dems renew push to kill panels that give industry say in regulations

lansing dome
Michigan lawmakers are continuing their push to repeal laws approved under the administration of former Republican Gov. Rick Snyder that limit environmental regulators’ power. (iStock photo by gnagel)
  • Michigan Democrats are continuing their push to repeal Snyder-era laws that limited state environmental regulators’ power
  • They are considering a trio of bills to eliminate outside review panels that give industry a bigger voice in state decisions 

Michigan Democrats are continuing their push to expand state environmental regulators’ power, this time targeting oversight boards created during the administration of former Republican Gov. Rick Snyder that environmentalists call “polluter panels.”

On Thursday, a House committee considered Senate Bills 393 and 394 to repeal the Environmental Science Advisory Board and the Environmental Permit Review Commission, two of three bodies that Republicans created in 2018 to give industry a greater voice in state environmental decisions.


A separate bill up for consideration in the Senate, House Bill 4826, would abolish the third panel, known as the Environmental Rules Review Committee.

The panels are made up of appointees who can challenge decisions made by Michigan’s Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy at the request of outside groups. 


Sen. Rosemary Bayer, D-Beverly Hills, who is sponsoring the bills, called the permit review panels “just flat-out overhead” that waste time and money because members rarely disagree with regulators’ decisions.

Testifying Thursday, state officials said each petition can take hundreds of hours to review, forcing EGLE to dedicate multiple staffers to the panel.

Gov. Gretchen Whitmer has already abolished the Environmental Science Advisory Board, making Bayer’s bill to eliminate that body mere housekeeping.

The effort has support from environmental groups and opposition from some business groups, such as the Michigan Farm Bureau.

Those groups tend to argue that the commissions’ existence keeps state regulators honest.

“Decision-making for the environment is made with the thought that it’ll be filtered with that commission, so only good rules are being promulgated,”  Rep. David Martin, R-Davidson, said at Thursday’s hearing. 

The Democratic push is part of a struggle between liberal and conservative interests over how much power regulators should have to interpret and enforce laws.

Republicans generally argue that onerous regulations are bad for business, while Democrats argue strong rules protect the environment.


At the federal level, momentum in that struggle has recently shifted in conservatives’ favor, following years of effort to appoint conservative judges to the federal bench.

But liberals have the momentum in Michigan, where Democrats control both legislative chambers and the executive branch for the first time in decades. 

In addition to the push to abolish the panels, Democrats are sponsoring bills that would restore EGLE’s power to make water quality rules and give regulators more power to force cleanups at contaminated industrial sites.

The bills considered Thursday have already cleared the Senate. But they’ll face longer odds in the House, at least until an April special election to fill two vacant house seats that have left the chamber evenly-split between Republicans and Democrats.

How impactful was this article for you?

Michigan Environment Watch

Michigan Environment Watch examines how public policy, industry, and other factors interact with the state’s trove of natural resources.

Michigan Environment Watch is made possible by generous financial support from:

Our generous Environment Watch underwriters encourage Bridge Michigan readers to also support civic journalism by becoming Bridge members. Please consider joining today.

Only donate if we've informed you about important Michigan issues

See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:

  • “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
  • “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
  • “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.

If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate Now