Deer, fishing fees headed for change under Snyder plan

The cost of shooting a deer in Michigan would double next year, under Gov. Rick Snyder’s proposed 2014 budget, and more conservation officers would patrol the state’s woods and waterways.

Released Thursday, Snyder’s budget calls for $354.3 million for the Department of Natural Resources, which would allow the agency to hire 41 more conservation officers, improve more fish habitat, enhance wildlife management activities, expand some state game areas and improve trails.

“Fundamentally, the budget is predicated on the role that natural resources play in the long-term recovery of Michigan,” DNR Director Keith Creagh said. “Our stakeholders (hunting and fishing groups) have said that we need some additional investment — in fisheries, wildlife and habitat.”

A cornerstone of the 2014 DNR budget is a plan to overhaul fishing and hunting license fees. The proposal, which calls for doubling the cost of a firearm deer license, but lowering the cost of an all-species fishing license, would generate $18 million annually, DNR officials said.

Hunting-fishing license proposal

The DNR currently generates about $50 million annually from fishing and hunting license sales, agency officials said.

The license fee increases are overdue, said Erin McDonough, executive director of the Michigan United Conservation Clubs. MUCC is the state’s largest conservation group.

“There’s no denying that when you compare our fees to other states, we are low,” McDonough said. “But any fee increase has to come with better transparency, and the department has to ensure that the return on this investment supports the kind of work that sportsmen and sportswomen want to see.”

McDonough said MUCC would not take a formal stance on the license fee package until it reviews all of the details.

Deep cuts in the DNR budget since 2000 — coupled with stagnant license fees and rising inflation — have reduced the DNR’s spending power by 47 percent and hampered its ability to properly manage natural resources, agency officials said.

The license fees proposed for 2014 would still keep the cost of Michigan’s hunting and fishing licenses below what most surrounding states charge, according to data from other states.

Under the proposal, the cost of a firearm deer license would increase from $15 to $30 for residents (which includes a $10 base fee for all hunting licenses), and go from $138 to $170 for nonresidents. Senior citizens would pay $12 for deer license under the plan, double the current fee of $6.

Every hunter would be required to pay $10 for a basic hunting license, and additional fees for different species of birds and mammals. Aside from deer, the license fees would remain the same for most other fur-bearing animals and birds.

All Michigan anglers would pay $25 for an all-species fishing license under the proposed DNR budget, down from the current $28 fee. The basic fishing license, which currently costs $15 and provides a lower cost alternative for anglers not interested in catching trout or salmon, would be replaced by the $25 all-species license.

Senior citizen fishing licenses would cost $10 under the proposed DNR budget, down from the current fee of $11.20.

Michigan’s last increase in hunting and fishing license fees was approved in 1996. A 2006 proposal to raise the fees died in the Legislature.

Creagh said revenue from the proposed license fee increases would be used to put more biologists in the field and support more habitat restoration. He added it won’t fund administrative costs or “buy more computers.”

Bryan Burroughs, executive director of the Michigan Chapter of Trout Unlimited, said persistent cuts in the DNR budget have decimated important research programs and jeopardized some fisheries.

“One of the things we’re seeing is a lack of expertise (among DNR officials) in any one type of fishery,” Burroughs said. “I would hope that if the department gets more money, it would change that.”

Jeff Alexander is owner of J. Alexander Communications LLC and the author of "Pandora's Locks: The Opening of the Great Lakes - St. Lawrence Seaway." A former staff writer for the Muskegon Chronicle, Alexander writes a blog on the Great Lakes at

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Sun, 02/10/2013 - 1:03pm
Being a fishing woman and married to a devoted fly caster, I have no qualms about the increases. The DNR does a great job of protecting our natural resources and I support their being given more money to operate.
Sun, 02/10/2013 - 1:28pm
As a long-term hunter and fisherman, I will gladly pay more for the continued privilege of hunting in our beautiful state, and I strongly support the governor's fee proposals. Michigan's DNR has been short-changed and cut back for far too many years, to the detriment of our precious game and fish species. In addition to increased habitat development and additional biologists, I would like to see more conservation officers in the field as well, to expand game law enforcement and penalties for those who abuse the system. Our fish and game resources are some of Michigan's most valuable assets, and a tremendous source of tourism to help our economy. Hunting and fishing fees ensure that these assets are preserved and enhanced for our enjoyment, and for future generations.
Sun, 02/10/2013 - 3:03pm
Hopefully, this additional revenue will show a benefit to us, the users of hunting & fishing resources. Its so easy to create buracracy with out any real benefit. Didn't realize there was a significant increase in conservation violations that required the increase in COs or is it just that more is better?
Red Man
Tue, 02/12/2013 - 4:37pm
I DISAGREE, double the gas TAX, double the license plate fee (TAX) , double hunting license fees (TAX) With 80% (yes the DNR says- what 10-20%) of the deer herd in many southern (zone3) counties gone from last summer’s midge fly kill, there won’t be many hunters this fall. So let’s double the fee (tax) that will make the deer herd better? The only thing left to hunt is squirrels. Tax tax tax No wonder the businesses leave this state, business goes so do people.
Thu, 02/21/2013 - 9:19pm
It has become apparent just give me more money and that will solve the problem. It will for the short term but there is very little imagination on how to market the resources we have in Michigan. By raising the nonresidents license fees it will help reduce there involvement in our economy. I feel we should have 3 day licenses for nonresidents so they can participate in events like the squirrel hunt in Cilo Michigan this year that had 400 teams involved. Developing events like this and allowing nonresidents to be involved by purchasing a 3 day license at a reasonable price. Michigan out of doors filmed the squirrel hunt this year. They also filmed our 10th annual bow and arrow rabbit hunt this year. We have bagged 4 rabbits and one mouse in the 10 years but have bought out of state hunters to it. Use some imagination on the possibilities. Dale