Fake news site attacking Dem congressional candidate earns flagrant foul

How we make the call

Truth Squad assigns five ratings to the political statements we review, in descending levels of accuracy:

No factual inaccuracies in the statement and no important information is missing
Mostly accurate
While the statement is largely accurate, it omits or exaggerates facts, or needs some clarification
Half accurate
Truths are interspersed with mistruths, or the speaker left out significant facts that render his/her remarks misleading in important respects
Mostly inaccurate
The major point or points made are untrue or misleading, even while some aspects of the claim may be accurate
The statement is false, or based on false underlying facts


Who:The National Republican Congressional Committee
What:“South Michigan Update” attacking Pam Byrnes
The Call:Flagrant Foul

Relevant text:

The website itself

Democrat Pam Byrnes is challenging Republican incumbent Tim Walberg in the 7th Congressional District, which covers much of the area between Lansing and the southern border of Michigan. The district runs from Coldwater on its western edge, to Monroe on its eastern edge.

The National Republican Congressional Committee created a website called “South Michigan Update” that resembles a news website, complete with what appears to be a news article and a byline.

The NRCC set up numerous websites across the country that attack Democratic candidates. Here’s one called the “Central Valley Update,” attacking a Democratic candidate Amanda Renteria in the 21st Congressional District in California.

Interestingly, the byline on the article in the “Central Valley Update” is the same as the byline on the “South Michigan Update.” Apparently “Geoff” logs a lot of miles between Michigan and California.

On both sites, the “most viewed” entry on the right side of the page is a campaign ad for the Republican candidate running in the race.

Dated Aug. 1 under the headline, “Byrnes struggles to escape her record,” the page is a fairly standard political attack – mining Byrne’s voting record in the Michigan Legislature for instances in which she supported higher taxes to make the case that she is too liberal. According to the fake news article on the website, “Byrnes voted for countless taxes – a 6 percent sales tax on services, an 11.5 percent income tax increase, and a 22percent business tax surcharge.”

The income tax and sales tax increases were part of a budget deal in 2007 that ended a brief government shutdown.

The website does not mention that both those tax increases could not have passed without Republican votes, because Republicans were the majority party in the Michigan Senate.

The claim Byrnes voted for a 22 percent business tax surcharge is a reference to the Single Business Tax being replaced in 2007 by the Michigan Business Tax.

Byrnes did vote to replace the SBT with the MBT, but the website fails to provide the context that some Republicans in the House also voted for the change, and that a majority of the votes in support of the replacement in the Senate came from Republicans.

At the bottom of the page, in tiny print, is a notice that the website is “Paid for by the National Republican Congressional Committee and not authorized by any candidate or candidates’ committee.”

The websites have received national attention, and general condemnation because of their deceptive tactics.

Walberg campaign manager Stephen Rajzer referred Truth Squad to the NRCC for comment.

NRCC spokesperson Daniel Scarpinato told Michigan Radio that the site does not pose any ethical problems because no one would believe the anti-Byrnes website or other similar websites are actual news sites.

“These aren’t news sites. They are – and they’re not fake; they’re real attack websites. They’re real political attack websites. They’re not meant to be news websites and they’re not news sites,” Scarpinato told Michigan Radio.

The call:Flagrant Foul

This is one of the easier Michigan Truth Squad calls of the political season. Creating a website meant to fool voters into believing it is a news site, and publishing a fake news story attacking a candidate, is the height of deception and a disservice to the public. It’s not the charges made in the “story,” (that’s pretty standard fare in political campaigns), it’s the clear effort to deceive the electorate that earns the foul.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Wed, 09/24/2014 - 9:47am
Reprehensible. 'NRCC spokesperson Daniel Scarpinato told Michigan Radio that the site does not pose any ethical problems because no one would believe the anti-Byrnes website or other similar websites are actual news sites.' A total lie and this NRCC liar knows it. It appears the Republicans know they can't win on facts, honest differences and just have to keep people from voting and lie to the rest.
John Q.
Wed, 09/24/2014 - 10:03am
Has anyone ever used the term "South Michigan"? Another example of overpaid clueless political hacks.
Wed, 09/24/2014 - 1:52pm
Good call...obvious some PR firm that couldn't find Mi on a map. The TV stations must be making a ton of $$
Wed, 09/24/2014 - 2:00pm
Bridge called 2 flagrant fouls, one against Byrnes for attacking Wahlberg, and the other against the RNCC for attacking Byrnes. How about a rule that says anyone who spouts lies, or has lies spouted in their behalf, be disallowed from running for any office. I know that the SCOTUS would never let such a law stand, but something must be done about the extremists on both sides.
Wed, 09/24/2014 - 2:46pm
I agree with you 100%