Michigan needs to change the way it funds education so that schools get more money for students who need extra attention — such as those who live in poverty and those who don’t yet have a strong command of the English language.
That’s the top recommendation from a prominent group of educators, policymakers, and business leaders who have studied Michigan’s school funding system for much of the past two years.
While many states use a complex formula that gives schools more money if they serve children facing extra challenges, Michigan has long used a system that distributes the same amount of money for virtually all students, regardless of their needs.
Related Michigan education stories:
- We read 12 reports on fixing Michigan schools. Here are 4 things we learned
- Got 6 minutes? Highlights of a dozen studies on Michigan schools
- Getting past politics to give Michigan the schools it deserves
- West Michigan leaders join chorus for state education reform
The state provides some extra funding for students with disabilities — but not nearly enough, according to a state study last year that found schools across Michigan are getting $700 million less a year than they need to serve those students.
The study released last month recommends a major restructuring so that schools would be fully funded for special education programs and would get extra funds to provide resources to students who need extra help. With that money, schools could offer lower class sizes, add counselors and social workers, and give teachers more support, the report says.
The study was conducted by Augenblick, Palaich and Associates on behalf of the Michigan School Finance Research Collaborative.
The collaborative — including top business and education leaders across the state — came together in 2016 after an earlier “school adequacy study” was largely ignored by political leaders.
The earlier study, which was funded by the state Legislature, recommended the state significantly increase the amount of money it sends to schools per student.
Recent Michigan education stories:
- Which Michigan 3rd-graders will flunk reading? The state has no idea.
- Michigan spent $80 million to improve early reading. Scores went down.
- A Betsy DeVos cheat sheet for next ‘60 Minutes’ interview on Michigan schools
The collaborative hopes this new more robust study, which clocks in at more than 300 data-packed pages, will have a greater impact.
Since this study used multiple methods to determine the right funding level for schools, it will be more difficult to ignore, the group hopes.
The study — paid for with $843,000 from major foundations and 18 county school districts — included interviews with hundreds of educators, including district and charters school teachers. Those interviews helped researchers determine how much money schools need to more effectively do their jobs.
The study examined geographic cost differences in different parts of the state, labor cost differences, and other factors and determined that schools need approximately $9,590 each for students who don’t have special needs, including funds that would come from the state and federal governments.
The study recommends that schools get 35 percent more for students living in poverty, between 50 and 70 percent more for students who are learning English, 70 percent more for students with mild disabilities and 115 percent more for students with moderate disabilities.
Among other recommendations in the report is that charter schools receive the same per-student funding as districts. Currently, the state’s funding system pays some districts more per student than others based largely on historic funding levels as opposed to current needs. Some districts — including most charter schools — are currently getting around $7,600 per child from the state while others get thousands of dollars more.
It’s difficult to compare how much funding schools are getting now with the proposed $9,590 per student because schools get a mix state and federal dollars and the $9,590 doesn’t include things like transportation dollars.
The report suggests the state use a new approach to student transportation in which transportation dollars are distributed differently, taking into account differences between urban and rural school districts.
The report did not put a price tag on the cost of implementing the recommendations and did not spell out how Michigan could come up with the extra money. But members of the collaborative said they hope lawmakers will consider the report as they make policy changes.
“The issue here is not about whether you live in Farmington or whether you live in Ingham County, it’s about every child ought to have the opportunity to be successful and that ought to be our goal in Michigan,” said Randy Liepa, the Superintendent of Wayne County’s intermediate school district. “I don’t think there will be significant pushback on that.”