Public transit advocates in metro Detroit bolster their case for an upgraded system with its success in a city very similar to Detroit, with declining population, a readjusting economy and a fiercely loyal residential cohort pulling for its success – Cleveland.
Once a center of blue-collar prosperity and Ohio’s largest city, Cleveland slipped behind Columbus in population decades ago, although, like Metro Detroit, the seven-county Cleveland region remains a vital economic center for the state and home to 2.8 million people. And, also like Detroit, the central city has seen a rebirth of sorts, with sports, arts and the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame drawing not just tourists but Clevelanders wanting to live and work in the heart of it.
But at the turn of the century, the link between the central city’s largest employment centers – downtown and University Circle, five miles apart – was a standard city bus line down Euclid Avenue, the city’s equivalent of Detroit’s Woodward.
Service was good enough, said Joe Calabrese, executive director of the Cleveland Regional Transit Authority, but it wasn’t attracting the “choice rider,” the white-collar worker with other options. Economic development along the Euclid corridor was stagnant, “a depressing situation,” Calabrese calls it.
When he arrived from New York City in 2000, Calabrese wasn’t taking over a system in the same shape as Metro Detroit’s. The Cleveland region supports its public transit with a 1 percent sales tax, and rail commuting was well-established there. But Euclid needed improvements that new buses alone couldn’t accomplish. And new light rail was prohibitively expensive. Former Gov. George Voinovich had seen bus rapid transit on a trip to Brazil. He wondered if it could work in his hometown.
As it turned out, it could. The BRT line that was constructed beginning in 2005 opened three years later, at a total cost of $200 million, about half provided by the federal government. Today, Calabrese said, it boasts the highest return on investment for any public transit project in the country – $114 for every dollar spent.
The key seemed to be to give riders not only a shiny new bus line, but significantly improved service along the way.
Calabrese ticks them off: The BRT was given its own lane, in the center of Euclid Avenue. The buses themselves, 63 feet long and articulated in the middle to bend around corners, have a capacity of 100 riders. They stop at 36 newly built stations, which replaced 108 existing stops. The stations are raised platforms, and the buses dock precisely, so when the multiple sliding doors – on both sides – open, riders walk (or, if they’re wheelchair-dependent, roll) right on, similar to a subway or light-rail car.
What’s more, passengers pay their fare offboard, at a kiosk or online, so there’s no lineup fumbling for change at a fare box. Once the bus gets under way, it travels in sync with traffic signals, so no waiting at lights, either.
The various efficiencies add up, Calabrese said. Travel time between Public Square and University Circle, the ends of the route, dropped from 40 minutes to 28. Riders entering a station can look at a lighted display to know when the next train was arriving. The experience is supported by smartphone mobile apps.
Commuters liked it enough to push ridership up 48 percent the first year, and it’s been climbing by 5 percent every year since, Calabrese said. The train, originally to be named the Silver Line, was christened the HealthLine, for the two hospitals along the way that bought naming rights.
But it’s what happened along the route that really distinguishes Cleveland’s BRT. Crain’s Cleveland Business called the HealthLine the catalyst for the economic rebirth of the Euclid corridor, with $6 billion in real estate investment.
“They can’t build apartments fast enough,” said Calabrese. “There are more people living downtown now than when the city’s population was double what it is now.”
The pro-public transit Institute for Transportation & Development Policy ranked the HealthLine the highest-quality corridor in the U.S. and Canada. A spokeswoman for the Cleveland Clinic, one of the hospitals that bought naming rights, called it a vital link for both employees and patients.
Calabrese said he’d advise advocates for better public transit, including BRT, in southeast Michigan to make sure support for any project here is deep and wide.
“What made this work is support at every level, which is not easy to do,” he said. In Cleveland, businesses wanted BRT because of what they hoped it would do for their investments. They lobbied elected officials. And there were well over 100 public hearings, not all uniformly enthusiastic about the new hybrid.
“Some said rail or nothing,” said Calabrese. “Riders of the (existing Euclid bus) were happy with it because they knew nothing else.”
But in the end, Calabrese said the HealthLine was a no-losers project; even cyclists got new bike lanes when the street was reconfigured for the center transit lane. He calls BRT “light rail on different wheels” because of the enhanced user experience, but without the enormous infrastructure investment of rail lines.
“When I started in transit, most of the calls we’d get would be from riders, wanting to know how to get around,” he said. “Nowadays it’s employers calling, wanting to know how they can improve transit access to their facility, because that’s the only way to attract young talent.”