Good roads or bad, Proposal 1 hated equally across Michigan

 












 


 

The defeat of Proposal 1 left observers groping for appropriate language – wipeout, thumping and, perhaps inevitably, roadkill.

But this was no hyperbole.

Proposal 1, which would have raised the sales tax 17 percent while simultaneously changing the way fuel is taxed and making numerous other changes in state law and its constitution, wasn’t just rejected by voters, it was rejected with extreme prejudice. And the rejection bore no relation to road conditions in individual counties.

Proposal 1 lost in every one of Michigan’s 83 counties. In 62 of them, “no” votes exceeded 80 percent, with two (Gladwin and Arenac) over 90 percent. The strongest support came from Washtenaw County, where 35.4 percent voted in favor, which means it still lost there by nearly 2-1. And it lost, on average, by 86-14 in the six counties with highest percentage of roads ranked as “poor.”

Rejection of the roads measure also flouted political assumptions. It was crushed 81-19 in heavily Democratic Wayne County, where President Obama got his biggest victory in 2012. And it was defeated 77-23 in Ottawa County, the most Republican county in the state and where Gov. Rick Snyder – Proposal 1's biggest supporter – got his biggest win just a year ago.

The only glimmer of correlation between road quality and results – and it is a faint and perhaps surprising one – was in Kalamazoo, where roads are among the state’s best, and yet Proposal 1 got 32.7 percent “yes” votes, third-highest in the state.

These maps shade the state’s counties by road quality and voting results. Hover over each county to see how each voted and the condition of its roads.



// The visible tile layer L.mapbox.tileLayer('mike63wilkbridge.MichiganRoads2014').addTo(map);

// Load interactivity data into the map with a gridLayer var myGridLayer = L.mapbox.gridLayer('mike63wilkbridge.MichiganRoads2014').addTo(map);

// And use that interactivity to drive a control the user can see. var myGridControl = L.mapbox.gridControl(myGridLayer).addTo(map);

// Finally, center the map. map.setView([45.6, -86.2], 6);

map.dragging.disable(); map.touchZoom.disable(); map.doubleClickZoom.disable(); map.scrollWheelZoom.disable();

// The visible tile layer L.mapbox.tileLayer('mike63wilkbridge.Prop1').addTo(map);

// Load interactivity data into the map with a gridLayer var myGridLayer = L.mapbox.gridLayer('mike63wilkbridge.Prop1').addTo(map);

// And use that interactivity to drive a control the user can see. var myGridControl = L.mapbox.gridControl(myGridLayer).addTo(map);

// Finally, center the map. map.setView([45.1, -86.5], 6);

map.dragging.disable(); map.touchZoom.disable(); map.doubleClickZoom.disable(); map.scrollWheelZoom.disable();

Data presentations by Mike Wilkinson from various sources.

Like what you’re reading in Bridge? Please consider a donation to support our work!

It takes time, money, and hard work to inform Michigan readers and leaders with substantive, in-depth, future-oriented news and analysis. If you value our journalism, please consider a one-time donation or a monthly contribution. It takes just a moment to donate here. Please join the thousands of Bridge readers who are helping grow and sustain our nonprofit, in-depth public service journalism in Michigan.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Comments

Michael Holton
Thu, 05/07/2015 - 9:45am
I am not against increasing my taxes for roads. I just want to know that the money will be used for roads. Come up with a simple ballot proposal that is transparent and easily understood.
Debora
Thu, 05/07/2015 - 10:21am
We need more focus on what policies/laws/decisions failed to maintain our infrastructure. Quick fixes are becoming the norm and are one of our biggest problems. They are short and to the point but do not keep the same problem from happening again. Don’t propose a quick fix without 50% addressing changes on how we do business. The funds generated can be earmarked/targeted/promised/restricted to get the roads fixed but what can be done to improve the way we do business, promises ONLY? Doesn’t work.
R
Thu, 05/07/2015 - 11:12am
We have elected these folks to, "think outside the box", and the lack of anyone to bring up the 2 ton elephant standing amongst them is evident they seem not to be serious about resolving this revenue issue; not just for roads either. The last poll taken, state wide, there is above an 80 pecent support for legalization of Marijuana (taxes folks). We as citizens need to hold our elected officials accountable and do their job; making commonsense decisions. This really is a "no brainer".
Joe
Thu, 05/07/2015 - 1:14pm
Stop arresting potheads and tax marijuana like Colorado to fill potholes while increasing the gas tax for those Cadillac Escalade owners who obviously don't mind paying more for gas.
Charles Richards
Thu, 05/07/2015 - 1:40pm
As I recall, Colorado raised $50 million from marijuana taxes.
Jim Vance
Thu, 05/07/2015 - 11:37am
This outcome was totally predicted. The poll predicted, and everyone in business and socially with whom I discussed Proposition 1, supported a "yes" vote for a straight forward 'Highway Improvement Proposition' without all of the extraneous baggage!
Gene Markel
Thu, 05/07/2015 - 4:26pm
From where will the money come when a budget shortfall appears on the horizon and there is no solution to fix it. I am sure that in the back of the legislators minds if Proposal 1 passed funds from the new taxes could be used to shore up the budget. If our friends in Lansing try a Brownback Kansas solution, it might not go down very well with the folks here in Michigan. It is time for a Constitutional Amendment creating a progressive Income tax on individuals as well as corporations and raising the gas tax to $0.30 a gallon. This is a rational solution to Michigan's budget problems. I am sure this is the furthest thing from our legislators minds. Maybe they can get an emergency manager.
Chris
Fri, 05/08/2015 - 5:00pm
If "they" can come up with millions to give Detroit a free pass on decades of poor management and corruption. Then"they" can come up with millions to fix the roads. Starve the beast
Mr. Obvious
Sun, 05/10/2015 - 11:42am
Legalize marijuana and tax it.....Js
Joseph Lenard @...
Wed, 05/13/2015 - 8:24pm
Now that Proposal 1 has been TROUNCED, as we knew it would be - It is time for the MILeg and MIGov to concentrate on JUST fixing the broken Roads, NOT more $$$ for "Transportation Fund" and all the excess it entails. NO MORE GENERAL FUNDING TAX INCREASES... Our Roads, like our Schools, need REAL REFORMS not just more money thrown at them and Patrick Colbeck and a few other Legislators are the only ones demanding we look at how and for what we spend our money on to Fix Michigan Roads. Many in Lansing, Government's in general, only solution to anything is a TAX INCREASE! It's time for Government to actually review and FIX AN ACTUAL PROBLEM rather than just throw money at it. The Governor, and far too many Legislators, want to put money into the General Transportation Fund; which would mean more money on Bike Paths, Road Landscaping, and yet more diverted to subsidize Mass-transit also; whereas those I support want more money to go to ONLY FIXING BROKEN ROADS (and not even toward more new Roads), for which the Price-tag is actually far less. FIX IT, DON'T DEMAGOGUE IT! Joseph Lenard @JLenardDetroit Wyandotte, MI