Jocelyn Benson says she’s committed to increasing Michigan voter turnout

Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson said both the state Bureau of Elections and local clerks offices are understaffed and underfunded, and the May 7 election will help determine where more resources are needed. (Courtesy photo)

As a law professor, Jocelyn Benson literally wrote the book on best practices of Secretaries of State nationwide.

Elected in November to that post in Michigan, Benson faces her first test Tuesday, when more than 500 jurisdictions affecting 17 percent of the state’s registered voters host elections to decide millages and other ballot questions.

Bridge recently discussed how she’s prepared in a wide-ranging interview. The conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

Bridge: What’s keeping you up at night ahead of the May 7 election?

Benson: The decentralization of the process and the hope that we can create some sort of basic statewide standards. The needs of our clerks vary significantly from community to community, and that's in part why I convened this election modernization commission that has folks from other states ... to advise us on what they learned so that we're not recreating the wheel.

I called all 83 (county) clerks in my first month to check in with them on this question and learn the unique challenges they face in their communities. (I’m) trying to learn about all of the local challenges and develop policies that will hopefully address them and educational materials that will fill all the gaps.

Bridge: This is the first election since the implementation of Promote the Vote, the constitutional amendment that voters approved in November to expand voting rights. What are the concerns of local clerks?

Benson: It runs the gamut. A lot of it's about resources. (There is a) fear of how are we going to implement these changes? How am I going to stay open on eight hours on the weekend, which is part of the requirement as well, when it's just me? For a lot of local clerks, (it) is just them.

In larger municipalities, there's more (staff), but our election administrators across the board are severely under-resourced. So any changes to election laws and additional requirements yield a question of how are we going to meet this requirement?

Bridge: Can the state provide support to local clerks?

Benson: We have a 30-person team in our Bureau of Elections, so we're also severely understaffed and under-resourced. But that said, we are working with the Bureau (of Elections) to improve the educational materials for the clerks themselves and to explore ways to standardize poll worker training, so that clerks have that support and to help recruit talent.

Also explore legal changes that will lessen the burden on the clerk: Right now, the law says you can only count ballots on Election Day. So if you have the option with security measures in place to start counting the day before Election Day, do we want to allow that for clerks in our more populous areas that may need that extra time?

That's the type of stuff that I'm both hearing and am working through. (I’m) trying to be a partner to all of our clerks and navigate through the minefield of Lansing to help get those resources to our local clerks as we prepare (to implement the new amendment).

Bridge: Unlike other states, Michigan’s elections are run by hundreds of local clerks, rather than counties or the state. Do you ever get frustrated at how decentralized our election system is?

Benson: I think it's for good reason: To protect against anyone having an unduly large role. I'm very personally committed to nonpartisan election administration and fairness, and all kinds of good government principles, but I believe in checks and balances regardless. So I think it's important to have that decentralization to provide that check on any one entity being too influential, and also to allow for local control.

My role is being a connector in sharing best practices, and one of support for our clerks. And where necessary to really implement some high standards of expectation for performance, so that if there are people who fall short of those standards, we have some kind of metric for measuring their success.

Bridge: What are the biggest challenges ahead with the amendments to enhance voter rights and allow a citizen commission to draw district lines?

Benson: The success of the implementation of both will depend in part on our success in letting voters know about (them) so that they can take advantage of those new rights, and we see an increase in turnout and as a result.

That's one thing that we've really tried to change in this office, take less of a passive role in communicating with voters and more proactive role. We've been holding town halls around the state, and we've identified the 100 precincts with the lowest turnout in our state. I am planning to go there over the next several months and talk with citizens there about what we can do better, make sure they know about these new rights and try to get a sense of what it would take to (increase voter turnout.)

Like what you’re reading in Bridge? Please consider a donation to support our work!

We are a nonprofit Michigan news site focused on issues that impact all citizens. In an era of click bait and biased news, we focus on taking the time to learn both sides of a story before we post it. Bridge stories are always free, but our work costs money. If our journalism helps you understand and love Michigan more, please consider supporting our work. It takes just a moment to donate here.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Comments

David Andrews
Fri, 05/03/2019 - 9:30am

Ms. Benson,
How do you plan to ensure compliance with Article II Sec. 1 of the Michigan Constitution that gives voting rights only to CITIZENS and residents:

"Every CITIZEN of the United States who has attained the age of 21 years, who has resided in this state six months, and who meets the requirements of local residence provided by law, shall be an elector and qualified to vote in any election except as otherwise provided in this constitution. The legislature shall define residence for voting purposes."

Notice that the Legislature can define "Residence"; however,"Citizen" is defined in the 14th amendment to the Federal Constitution.

Gary Lea
Fri, 05/03/2019 - 10:29am

Contact the Secretary of State on michigan.gov to ask your question (don't neglect a question mark).
Does Michigan law require the Secretary of State to ensure compliance with Article II Sec. 1 of the Michigan Constitution? If not, then you should lobby to make it so, but you first may be required to prove a NEED.

Kevin Grand
Fri, 05/03/2019 - 11:44am

If this "commitment" is anywhere near as comporable to what I've seen at the the local SoS branch offices when I dealt with some vehicle issues, I will very eagerly await The Bridge publishing a series of follow up pieces highlighting the abysimal job she's done since taking office.

I even foresee her fellow democrats turning on her when that happens.

middle of the mit
Fri, 05/03/2019 - 7:55pm

While I am sure that you are awaiting the SOS issues that you are complaining about, this article is about illegal immigrants. And your response had nothing to do with that.

You were talking about vehicle issues. So, unless your vehicle usage was an illegal immigrant....

And even and especially if it was, was a LEGAL EMPLOYER employing an illegal immigrant?

My only guess is that you are complaining about drivers licenses.

And if that was true, wouldn't or shouldn't the LEGAL EMPLOYER be an ILLEGAL EMPLOYER?

They aren't going to get in trouble for employing citizens!

I think it is time for the law abiding people to start calling out the non law abiding people.

That is why I am here.

If it is illegal for illegals to work in the US .....then it MUST BE ILLEGAL FOR EMPLOYERS TO EMPLOY THEM.

Equal footing under the LAW!

Are you FOR AMERICANS or just for those that gain massive profit?

Would you not agree?

Kevin Grand
Tue, 05/07/2019 - 7:32am

While she doesn't come right out and say it, if someone actually cares about maintaining the integrity of the voting process, it should be far more difficult to vote here in Michigan, than the Sec. Benson wants. No one should have ever their vote either diluted or negated by someone who should not be allowed to vote here in the first place.

Just to give you an idea of how ridiculously easy it has become, here are the latest requirements.

http://clerk.macombgov.org/sites/default/files/content/government/clerk/...

OABTW, I have absolutely no problems with e-Verify, if that answers your other question.

Ann Michalek
Fri, 05/03/2019 - 12:36pm

This is great, as long as citizenship is proven before voting. Now, can you work on the excessively long lines endured by many, at the SOS?

Matt
Sat, 05/04/2019 - 8:25am

Does increased voter turn out have anything to do with having a knowledgeable informed voters or just more people who want stuff?

Barry LaRue
Tue, 05/07/2019 - 11:07am

I found Ms. Benson's answers forthright. I still have yet to see any clear evidence of illegal voting in Michigan or, in fact, throughout the US. As far back as the early 1970s when I took high school political science I remember our teacher lamenting the low level of voter turnout in this country. Encouraging voter participation seems to me to be a VERY good thing and adding hurdles to discourage voting would appear to be counter to our democracy, regardless of your political party. I look forward to the work of the citizen commission charged with redrawing district lines. They should be drawn in a transparent way that transcends partisan affiliation.