Michigan population almost 10M again. These maps and charts explain how.

Michigan gained population in 2018 but not as fast as other parts of state.

Michigan gained more than 19,000 people in 2018, according to Census estimates, continuing a string of gains after population losses during the Great Recession.

Population change: 2010 to 2018

Rank State Percent
1 District of Columbia 16.7
2 Utah 14.4
3 Texas 14.1  
4 Florida 13.3
5 Colorado 13.2
42 Michigan 1.1

Population change: 2017 to 2018

Rank State Percent  
1 Nevada 2.1
2 Idaho 2.1
3 Utah 1.9
4 Arizona 1.7
5 Florida 1.5
38 Michigan 0.2

If Michigan could only find a way to clone Lathrup Village (population: 4,126), it'd finally have 10 million people again.

Census estimates released Wednesday show the state with 9,995,915 people, just short of the 10 million folks it last had in 2007 before population declines fueled by the Great Recession sparked a mini exodus.

But since the losses stopped just after 2010, Michigan's population growth has been slow but steady, adding just over 19,000 people in 2018. That's still likely not enough to avoid losing a congressional seat after the 2020 Census, dropping its delegation to 13. In 1980, the state had 19 members of Congress.

Numbers released Wednesday show the six states that gained the most residents (Texas, Florida, California, Arizona, North Carolina and Washington) added more people than currently live in Michigan -- and those gains, combined with slow to no growth elsewhere, will cause another shift of seats that will strip power from the Midwest and Northeast. 

Below is a map and two charts that explain Michigan's population changes.

Michigan, Midwest continue to struggle

Growth in the South and West has continued nearly unabated for a decade. But Michigan and much of the Midwest is still hurting, with Illinois actually losing people for the fifth year in a row, one of nine states to lose population from 2017 to 2018.

Michigan was in that boat not long ago. It was the only state to lose residents from 2000 to 2010. 

As of Wednesday, Michigan remains the 10th largest state, adding 19,500 people, the 22nd most in the country.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau

Rank State Score
35 ALABAMA 2.3
27 ALASKA 3.8
8 ARIZONA 12.2
29 ARKANSAS 3.4
20 CALIFORNIA 6.2
5 COLORADO 13.2
49 CONNECTICUT 0
16 DELAWARE 7.7
1 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 2.3
4 FLORIDA 13.3
14 GEORGIA 8.6
26 HAWAII 4.4
10 IDAHO 11.9
50 ILLINOIS -0.7
30 INDIANA 3.2
28 IOWA 3.6
38 KANSAS 2
31 KENTUCKY 3
33 LOUISIANA 2.8
43 MAINE 0.8
25 MARYLAND 4.7
23 MASSACHUSETTS 5.4
42 MICHIGAN 1.1
21 MINNESOTA 5.8
46 MISSISSIPPI 0.6
35 MISSOURI 2.3
17 MONTANA 7.4
22 NEBRASKA 5.6
7 NEVADA 12.4
31 NEW HAMPSHIRE 3
40 NEW JERSEY 1.3
39 NEW MEXICO 1.8
43 NEW YORK 0.8
13 NORTH CAROLINA 8.9
6 NORTH DAKOTA 13
40 OHIO 1.3
24 OKLAHOMA 5.1
12 OREGON 9.4
43 PENNSYLVANIA 0.8
47 RHODE ISLAND 0.4
11 SOUTH CAROLINA 9.9
15 SOUTH DAKOTA 8.4
18 TENNESSEE 6.7
3 TEXAS 14.1
2 UTAH 14.4
48 VERMONT 0.1
19 VIRGINIA 6.5
9 WASHINGTON 12.1
51 WEST VIRGINIA -2.5
37 WISCONSIN 2.2
34 WYOMING 2.5

Births fall, deaths rise

In Michigan, births are declining and deaths are rising. In many parts of the state, deaths actually outnumber births but overall, there are more births than deaths. Michigan has seen births fall to the lowest level since the mid-1940s. In West Virginia, Maine and Vermont, there were more deaths than births in 2018.

 

Migration boosts growing states

There's another way to gain population: Migration. The states growing the fastest rely heavily on migration, both attracting people from other states and other countries. For those states that grew by at least 5 percent since 2010, over 60 percent of their gains are attributed to migration.

In Michigan, less than a quarter of the annual gains come from migration and the state is still losing more people to other states than are coming to Michigan. In the 2000s, those losses hovered around 100,000 people a year; an estimated 16,700 more people left the state than came in 2018.

 

Big states get bigger

California, Texas and Florida continued to gain population along with much of the South and West.

State 2018 Change since 2010
California 39,557,045 2,236,142
Texas 28,701,845 3,459,166
Florida 21,299,325 2,453,540
New York 19,542,209 142,129
Pennsylvania 12,807,060 95,902
Illinois 12,741,080 -99,682
Ohio 11,689,442 150,115
Georgia 10,519,475 807,665
North Carolina 10,383,620 809,327
Michigan 9,995,915 118,380
New Jersey 8,908,520 108,896
Virginia 8,517,685 494,005
Washington 7,535,591 792,689
Arizona 7,171,646 763,872
Massachusetts 6,902,149 335,718
Tennessee 6,770,010 414,709
Indiana 6,691,878 201,442
Missouri 6,126,452 130,476
Maryland 6,042,718 254,076
Wisconsin 5,813,568 123,089
Colorado 5,695,564 647,283
Minnesota 5,611,179 300,336
South Carolina 5,084,127 448,471
Alabama 4,887,871 102,423
Louisiana 4,659,978 115,446
Kentucky 4,468,402 120,202
Oregon 4,190,713 353,181
Oklahoma 3,943,079 183,447
Connecticut 3,572,665 -6,460
Utah 3,161,105 385,771
Iowa 3,156,145 105,378
Nevada 3,034,392 331,928
Arkansas 3,013,825 91,847
Mississippi 2,986,530 15,994
Kansas 2,911,505 53,292
New Mexico 2,095,428 30,840
Nebraska 1,929,268 99,732
West Virginia 1,805,832 -48,382
Idaho 1,754,208 183,435
Hawaii 1,420,491 56,528
New Hampshire 1,356,458 39,681
Maine 1,338,404 10,772
Montana 1,062,305 71,583
Rhode Island 1,057,315 3,377
Delaware 967,171 67,576
South Dakota 882,235 66,070
North Dakota 760,077 85,367
Alaska 737,438 23,532
District of Columbia 702,455 97,370
Vermont 626,299 419
Wyoming 577,737 13,254

Like what you’re reading in Bridge? Please consider a donation to support our work!

We are a nonprofit Michigan news site focused on issues that impact all citizens. In an era of click bait and biased news, we focus on taking the time to learn both sides of a story before we post it. Bridge stories are always free, but our work costs money. If our journalism helps you understand and love Michigan more, please consider supporting our work. It takes just a moment to donate here.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Comments

Reynolds Farley
Thu, 12/20/2018 - 9:12am

Population growth is ordinarily a stimulant for economic growth. And population stagnation of decline is often linked to economic stagnation. It is good that Michigan's population increased a bit but the overall trend is not so good. Birth rates have fallen, As the figure shows, the surplus of births over deaths has greatly decreased over time. The majority of our counties are now places of natural decline - more deaths than births.
I hope the new administration addresses demographic issues. We need to encourage migration from the rest of the US and abroad. As the high tech end of the vehicle industry grows in Detroit and Southeast Michigan, we may see an influx of STEM graduates from
Asia and the Middle East, some with advanced degrees from US institutions.
There will also be an issue of address the high levels of poverty found in some of the most rural and isolated counties, problems that are linked to population stagnation and decline.

Laurence Rosen
Thu, 12/20/2018 - 12:28pm

It is also important to recognize that a portion (perhaps a significant portion) of those leaving Michigan over the past decade have been recent college graduates and others with higher education who are seeking employment elsewhere. During the 40 years I've lived in Michigan this reality has been driving discussion about diversifying Michigan's economy both to attract new residents as well as to provide opportunities for more Michiganders. Unfortunately, efforts at diversification in Michigan have had only limited success. Even during this time of almost full employment, out-migration continues to drain Michigan of some of its most talented and potentially successful residents.

I believe that Prof. Farley is correct in his expectation that technology in the automobile industry will attract more science and technology workers to Michigan in the future. Nonetheless, attracting more people to Michigan through an even broader and more diverse set of opportunities will be needed to diminish and ultimately eliminate the steady movement of residents out of Michigan. Attention to Michigan's demographic issues and their relationship to economic growth beyond manufacturing should be important considerations not only for the new administration in Lansing but also for enlightened education and business leaders as well.

Urko
Mon, 12/24/2018 - 9:44am

Is this "story" some kind of joke? Michigan is going to lose ANOTHER congressional seat .. and that "growth?"

Michigan is about to start another eight years of recession/depression. No sane company moves into a state with (D) as gov/A.G. Looking at N.C. and AZ, right now.