Skip to main content
Bridge Michigan
Michigan’s nonpartisan, nonprofit news source

Journalism protects democracy

Trustworthy, nonpartisan local news like ours spurs growth, fosters relationships, and helps to ensure that everyone is informed. This is essential to a healthy democracy. Will you support the nonprofit, nonpartisan news that makes Michigan a better place this election year?

Make your tax-deductible contribution today.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate

Michigan Dems abolish panel that gives industry say in regulations

michigan capitol building
(iStock photo by benkrut)
  • Bills would abolish a Snyder-era oversight board that gave outside parties a say in environmental regulations
  • Controversial board one of three oversight panels Democrats and environmental advocates sought to undo 
  • Senators voted along party lines to advance the plan to Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s desk over objections from Republicans 

Michigan Senate Democrats on Tuesday voted to abolish one of three controversial regulatory oversight boards that critics had dubbed “polluter panels,” fulfilling a vow to reverse the environmental policies of their Republican predecessors.

In a 20-17 party-line vote, lawmakers advanced House Bill 4826 to Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s desk, where she is expected to sign it. The bill would abolish the Environmental Rules Review Committee, an oversight board created in 2018 by the then-Republican led legislature and Gov. Rick Snyder that gave outside parties a say in the state’s environmental regulations.

Sponsor

Democrats lauded the bill’s passage, saying it would remove an unnecessary layer of bureaucracy that baked significant delays to the rulemaking process. 

“Removing this bureaucracy leads to better decisions being made quicker,” Sen. Jeremy Moss, D-Southfield, said in a Senate floor speech.  

Related:

But Republicans decried the move as “allowing bureaucracy to run wild” with regulations that could drive business out of Michigan and unfairly shut businesses and residents out of the regulatory process. 

“You want to reform them, you want to give them more teeth, you want to give them a shorter timeline to get things done, let's do it,” Sen. Ed McBroom, an Upper Peninsula Republican, told his colleagues. “But to just go back the way it was, and let the bureaucracy run roughshod over the citizens of this state more is a dynamically foolish mistake.”

Here’s what to know: 

What the committee does

The Environmental Rules Review Committee is one of three oversight boards created during the administration of former Republican Gov. Rick Snyder that gave industry a greater voice in state decision making.

It is made up of appointees, including industry representatives, who vet new rules proposed by the state Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy.

When EGLE proposes a rule, the committee gets to review a draft and request changes. The committee also has the power to reject proposed rules, forcing EGLE to either work with the committee to resolve the dispute or submit a report to the governor defending its decision. 

The rulemaking process can then proceed only if the governor sides with EGLE.

Why Democrats want to abolish it

Democrats and environmentalists have long decried the boards as “polluter panels,” arguing that allowing polluting industries to oversee environmental regulations is akin to letting the fox guard the hen house.

They also say the review boards waste public time and money by adding an extra step to an already-tedious regulatory process. 

But proponents of the review panels argue their existence keeps state regulators honest, dissuading them from writing poorly-crafted regulations that outside groups are likely to challenge.

Other similar bills are under consideration 

Senate Bills 393 and 394, sponsored by Sen. Rosemary Bayer, D-Beverly Hills, would do away with the Environmental Science Advisory Board and the Environmental Permit Review Commission. Like the rules review committee, both boards were created in 2018 to give outside parties new ways to influence state decision making. 

Sponsor

Those bills have cleared the Senate and are now in a House committee. The bill is not likely to receive a vote until after an April special election breaks a tie between the number of Republican and Democratic representatives in the House. 

It’s part of a broader Democratic effort to expand state and local environmental regulators’ authority. In addition to the push to abolish the panels, Democrats are sponsoring bills that would restore EGLE’s power to make water quality rules and give regulators more power to force cleanups at contaminated industrial sites.

They are also pushing a bill that would abolish a statewide “ban on bans” of plastic bags, paving the way for local governments to regulate single-use plastics if they so choose.

Michigan Environment Watch

Michigan Environment Watch examines how public policy, industry, and other factors interact with the state’s trove of natural resources.

Michigan Environment Watch is made possible by generous financial support from:

Our generous Environment Watch underwriters encourage Bridge Michigan readers to also support civic journalism by becoming Bridge members. Please consider joining today.

Only donate if we've informed you about important Michigan issues

See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:

  • “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
  • “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
  • “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.

If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate Now