Who’s funding Michigan’s voting rights ballot proposal?

Proposal 3 would enshrine seven elections reforms in the Michigan constitution. The only organized opposition to the proposal has not yet disclosed its campaign finances.

Bridge series on ballot issues

Bridge Magazine is providing an in-depth look this week at three statewide ballot proposals Michigan voters will decide Nov. 6.

Throughout this crucial election year, Bridge and the nonprofit Center for Michigan are providing fact-based, data-driven information to voters about elections for Governor, Attorney General, Secretary of State and state legislative offices. This includes ballot initiatives. Today’s reports, on voting access, are the last of three this week.

TODAY: Proposal 3 (voting access)

Proposal 2 (redistricting)

Proposal 1 (legalizing recreational marijuana)

MORE RESOURCES:

Proposal 3 — the initiative to solidify a variety of voting rights reforms in the state constitution — is organized by the group Promote the Vote, which bills itself as a coalition of groups including the Michigan NAACP, the League of Women Voters, the American Civil Liberties Union and more. As of July 20 (the last campaign finance reporting deadline), the ballot committee has spent $2.5 million on petition signature gathering, consulting and marketing.

The only organized opposition to Prop 3 is from a group called Protect My Vote, which was created Aug. 23 and lists Mary Doster as treasurer. She is married to Okemos election law attorney Eric Doster and also serves as campaign treasurer for Republican-nominated Supreme Court justices. The group hasn’t yet had to report its campaign finances, so it is unclear how much money it has received or spent. Mary Doster could not be reached for comment Wednesday.

Bankrolled by the ACLU

The vast majority of funding for Promote the Vote comes from the American Civil Liberties Union, a national non-profit group that works to protect constitutional rights through litigation, lobbying and other types of political organizing. It most often comes under fire from conservative organizations, but has also drawn ire from the left for working to protect the free speech rights of neo-Nazis and other hate groups, among other things. The national ACLU group based in New York has given $2.29 million to Promote the Vote as of the July filing deadline.

The ACLU’s Michigan branch is Prop 3’s second-biggest funder. It is currently involved with nearly 80 lawsuits spanning issues such as environmental justice and LGBT rights. Earlier this year, it sued for the proposal to make the ballot but was later approved for the ballot by the Board of State Canvassers. It has contributed more than $265,000 to Promote the Vote.

Together, donations from the national and Michigan-based ACLUs account for 86 percent Promote the Vote’s funding through July.

Supporting actors

The United Auto Workers is Prop 3’s third-largest funder, giving $150,000 as of the latest campaign finance filing deadline. The UAW is a longtime power broker in Michigan politics that has worked hand-in-glove with the Michigan Democratic Party for decades.

The California-based Campaign for Democracy gave $100,000. The group has no website, but in a business filing with the State of California said it is intended to “advance pro-voter democracy reforms that allow all voters to have an equal voice in their democracy.”

The next-largest donors are individuals: Rachel Bendit, wife of U-M regent and high-profile attorney Mark Bernstein, a Democrat, gave $51,400. Joseph Malcoun, CEO of sales automation software company Nutshell, gave $25,350. Diana Raimi and Patrice Aaron of Ann Arbor and Promote the Vote executive committee member Erica Peresman each gave $10,000.

The remaining funds — around two percent of Promote the Vote’s total funding — came from donors who gave lesser amounts.

In total, Promote the Vote received around 300 individual contributions at the time of its latest campaign filing. Eighty-five percent of the contributions came from people living in Michigan.

Like what you’re reading in Bridge? Please consider a donation to support our work!

We are a nonprofit Michigan news site focused on issues that impact all citizens. In an era of click bait and biased news, we focus on taking the time to learn both sides of a story before we post it. Bridge stories are always free, but our work costs money. If our journalism helps you understand and love Michigan more, please consider supporting our work. It takes just a moment to donate here.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Comments

Lennie
Thu, 10/11/2018 - 10:52am

Purely a partisan effort.

Voting and voters do not need the trojan horses that are part of this proposal. If anything we need more independent elections and less party influence.

Terri
Sun, 10/14/2018 - 11:53am

Not true, the only "partisan" angle you can take is that the right does not believe in one person, one vote. Evidence is in the GOP sponsored disenfranchisement happening throughout the country. Our state can do better: let everyone vote and remove the barricades to the ballot box that exist!

Al
Wed, 10/24/2018 - 7:53pm

What disenfranchisement. Explain

DWF
Sat, 10/13/2018 - 10:09pm

The ACLU that defended Nazis no longer exists. It now never defends conservatives or religious liberty. It has been totally taken over by the left.

Robert
Wed, 10/24/2018 - 3:37pm

The idea of election day registration worries me. As a long time precinct supervisor, it would add more time for people to complete the voting process. Average poll workers ages are in their 70s and 80s.. I don't think that the majority of them could recognize a phony ID. The idea if no excuse absentee ballots is great, but, don't add the same day registration to the proposal.