Opinion | Line 5 tunnel is good for Michigan workers

Steve Claywell is president of the Michigan Building Trades and Construction Council

Update: Mackinac Bridge Authority shouldn't oversee Line 5 tunnel, Michigan Republicans say

Between the new deal to replace NAFTA and Gov. Rick Snyder’s agreement with the Canadian firm Enbridge to replace Line 5, there’s been a lot of discussion lately about U.S.-Canadian relations. People are trying to determine which country got the better deal. We see that in Jim Lively’s Oct. 17 commentary, “A tunnel for Line 5 is good news – for Canadians.”

Line 5 replacement isn’t a zero sum game. I know some are skeptical about cross-border agreements, but as Michiganders we should be used to the idea that, when it comes to our relationship with Canada, we both gain from cooperation. That’s certainly true with the Line 5 deal, which will generate hundreds of millions of private investment on our side of the border. That money, which will all come from Enbridge, will generate jobs for residents here and revenue for local and state government. State lawmakers should exercise oversight to make sure their constituents get the maximum benefit, but the idea we won’t get something from Line 5 replacement is silly.

Many of the arguments deployed against the Line 5 replacement are ones we heard in the fight about the Keystone XL Pipeline, which involved another Canadian company. As representatives of more than 100,000 working men and women, the Michigan Building and Construction Trades Council was one of several organizations that supported that pipeline. We support Line 5 replacement too because families on this side of the border certainly will be better off with it.

Bridge welcomes guest columns from a diverse range of people on issues relating to Michigan and its future. The views and assertions of these writers do not necessarily reflect those of Bridge or The Center for Michigan. Bridge does not endorse any individual guest commentary submission.

If you are interested in submitting a guest commentary, please contact Monica WilliamsClick here for details and submission guidelines.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Jim Preston
Fri, 11/02/2018 - 8:44am

And if we let the murder rate increase, we could create many more law enforcement jobs!

Fri, 11/02/2018 - 3:28pm

I hear your Jim. Only rich companies believe themselves.
Shut Down Line 5..it benefits no one, other than the greedy.

Fri, 11/02/2018 - 3:58pm

So you want this supposedly perilously dangerous pipeline left in place and not made safe??