Detroit is billing residents for rain. It’s going as well as you’d think.

Luljeta Duhani, owner of the Motown Cafe and Grill, tells Detroit neighborhood activist Russ Bellant that her restaurant’s drainage fees have skyrocketed since the city changed how it imposes the rates in July. (Bridge photo by Joel Kurth)

DETROIT –  Everywhere he goes, there’s concrete. On his driveway to get his car to go to breakfast. Driving on the road. In the parking lot of the coney island where he eats his eggs.

So when Russ Bellant sits down over his omelette at the Motown Cafe and Grill in one of America’s most industrialized cities, he has one question for its owner.

“Has your water and sewer bill gone up?” asks Bellant, a retired city employee and neighborhood activist with a salt-and-pepper beard and a knack for annoying City Hall.

Of course the bill has gone up.

Because Detroit, desperate for cash and facing a host of infrastructure woes, is now charging residents and businesses for rain that falls atop all that concrete before wending its way through the municipal sewer system.

In the past year, monthly water and sewer bills for the small restaurant have jumped to $284 from $90, owner Luljeta Duhani tells Bellant. Of that, $131 is for what the city calls a drainage fee but what critics contend is a tax on rain.

“It’s incredible. That means, every year, I’m paying $1,572 for rain,” she says.

She lets the word linger.

“For rain.”

Similar tales of outrage have abounded since last July, when Detroit completed the rollout of changes to the fee it’s charged since 1975 to treat stormwater before it’s released into the Detroit and Rouge rivers.

For years, Detroit charged residents a flat drainage rate, while businesses were supposed to pay based on the diameter of their water pipes or the amount of their properties’ “impervious acreage” ‒ that is, hard surfaces like concrete, roofs and hard gravel that don’t absorb water.

That led to a pell-mell system where rates varied wildly and large property owners had relatively low drain bills – or were never charged at all because they lacked water accounts, city officials say.

Now, all pay $598 per month per impervious acre. Owners of less than 0.02 acres are exempt from the fee, while others have gone up astronomically.

‘You can’t shut off the sky’

It’s a radical change for a city built on concrete.

Half of Detroit’s land is impervious, according to a 2013 report by the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments: 70 square miles, or almost as many as there are in all of Washtenaw and Livingston counties combined.

City budget documents project all that concrete will help Detroit increase the amount of money it collects from drain fees by 27 percent to more than $150 million per year.

But the extra money has also brought an ongoing lawsuit before the Michigan Supreme Court and big questions about fairness in a city whose aggressive bill collections also have led to more than 100,000 water  shutoffs for nonpayment in five years.

The outrage is amplified by a longstanding frustration that Detroit, the poorest big city in the United States, also is among the most heavily taxed in the nation, has the most expensive auto insurance and has some of the highest water and sewer rates among cities.

All that was prologue for the current controversy, which exploded in 2017 during the mayoral election, causing the city’s powerful pastors to protest the revamped drainage fee. Weeks after the fee was delayed for a year to residents and churches, a group of politically connected ministers endorsed Mayor Mike Duggan’s re-election.

Jonathan Kinloch, a Detroit water commissioner, said Detroit needs help from the state and federal governments as it addresses drainage issues.

“This fee seems like it was created by Mike Duggan and [Water and Sewer Director] Gary Brown throwing darts at a board,” said Tom Petzold, owner of the Belmont Shopping Center on Eight Mile Road whose drain charges jumped from $400 a month to $7,500 in July.

“Everyone is suspicious about this because it seems like the Wild West. … You can shut off people’s water if they don’t pay the bill. You can’t shut off the sky.”

Detroit officials say the rates are fair, lowering fees for 56 percent of all residents and equitably spreading the cost of treating wastewater. The change also allowed the city to increase its customer base for by 12 percent, some 22,000 customers who had never paid for drainage.

“The drainage charge is necessary in order to meet federal and state regulations to manage stormwater,” Bryan Peckinpaugh, a spokesman for the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department, wrote in an email.

“DWDS had several customer stakeholder meetings to get feedback prior to the drainage charge rate method transition. … [The charge] is equitably spreading the costs.”

Cities vexed by rising costs

Like many cities, Detroit’s sewers are combined, meaning rain, toilet water and industrial wastewater flow into the same pipes before they are treated at plants.

Detroit’s wastewater treatment plant is the second-largest in the world, expanded in 2006 to handle as much as 1.7 billion gallons per day. But the 3,000-mile network of pipes leading to the plant is showing its age, averaging 200 sinkholes and cave-ins per year in the past five years, city records show.

The drain fee helps repay $1 billion in upgrades Detroit has made to treatment facilities in recent years to satisfy state and federal requirements that are intended to prevent raw sewage from reaching rivers during heavy rains.

It’s an issue vexing older cities and increasing sewage bills, said Aaron Renn, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, a New York-based free-market think tank that focuses on domestic policy and urban affairs.

Detroit is one of 31 cities nationwide that were required by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to invest a total of $29 billion to retrofit combined sewer systems, which are used by 772 cities nationwide, mostly in the Northeast and Midwest, according to a report Renn wrote in 2016 called “Wasted: How to Fix America’s Sewers.”

“There’s no federal help, usually only limited help from states, so all of it has to be paid by ratepayers,” Renn told Bridge Magazine.

“Sewer bills are doubling and tripling, and mayors and politicians don’t want to talk about it. Who wants to talk about projects that voters can’t see? So if you’re a mayor, your only incentive is to be as quiet as you can, hold your nose and do it [raise the rates.] You have no choice.”

Jonathan Kinloch, a member of the Detroit Water Board of Commissioners, said Detroit can't simply solve its problem by raising rates and needs help from federal and state lawmakers.

“We have to find a way as the City of Detroit continues to make its rebound to take into account the poor and disadvantaged. Not everyone is rising in Detroit’s resurgence,” Kinloch said.

"The current funding model is destined to fail. We cannot continue to raise revenue on the backs of the population and business community least able to afford them. Public utilities are a necessity and we're going to have to find a way to work with state and federal legislators to deliver clean and safe water and sewerage," Kinloch added.

'Screwed, no matter what’

In Detroit, the change has yielded eye-popping and sometimes questionable bills.

One defendant in the lawsuit challenging the fee is Detroit Boat Yard, a funky marine storage facility on the city’s east side that’s known as the Goat Yard.

Locally famous as a “hippie boat yard” and the subject of a documentary, the facility has 1.73 acres and, when rain falls,  it goes directly off its docks onto the Detroit River, said its attorney Lisa Walinske.

Even so, the Goat Yard is billed more than $600 a month for drainage, she told Bridge.

“Other people with small lots are getting charged $3,000 a month. It’s crazy,” Walinske said.

“There’s a feeling that, in Detroit, we are going to get screwed no matter what they do because it’s Detroit … and they’re used to the city doing things wrong.”

A worker last fall helps replace a water pipe in Detroit. The city faces an infrastructure crisis because it delayed maintaining its sewer and water pipes for years as Detroit slid toward bankruptcy. (Bridge photo by Anthony Lanzilote)

Walinske is leading the Goat Yard and other Detroit residents in a lawsuit against the charge, claiming the fee is a tax increase that under Michigan law should have required approval by the voters.

The state Court of Appeals in November sided with the city, ruling the fees are “reasonably proportionate to the necessary cost of service.” The ruling  was appealed in February to the Michigan Supreme Court.

The case hinges on whether Detroit’s drainage rates are a fee or a tax.

In a 1998 landmark case involving stormwater fees, Bolt v. Lansing, Michigan’s high court ruled that municipal utilities can only levy fees if they fund specific services; are proportional to the cost of delivering that service, and allow users to opt out. Otherwise, the rate is considered a tax that requires voter approval, the court ruled.

The Court of Appeals ruled that while Detroit’s storm fees are involuntary,  the city met the other criteria for fees.

Questions of equity

Detroit officials contend there’s plenty of misinformation about the drain fee. They’ve hosted hearings, worked with customers on compromises and created a fact sheet to dispel what they contend are “myths” about the fee.

No, rain water isn’t “clean.” No, the charge isn’t a “money grab.” And yes, the city, believe it or not, can create a fair billing system even though rain and snowfall levels vary wildly from month to month, Detroit officials said.

Before rolling out the fee, the city conducted surveys of Detroit’s 139 square acres with airplanes, calculating each property owners’ impervious acreage. Fees are calculated based on the city’s annual volume of flow.

The city also has made several changes since first announcing the fees in 2016. Beyond delaying their rollout to many customers, the city agreed to phase in the fees over five years for owners of 22,000 parcels that hadn’t paid the storm charge; give property owners up to 80 percent credit for installing green infrastructure and create an independent process to contest the rates.

Detroit artist Aaron Timlin owns this former print shop on the city’s west side. It lacks a roof, hasn’t had running water in more than a decade, and is in foreclosure over $5,000 in drainage fees. (Bridge photo by Joel Kurth)

That may sound good, but the system is riddled with inconsistencies, said Petzold, the owner of the shopping center on Eight Mile and member of the Detroit Alliance Against the Rain Tax that is fighting the charge.

“It seems like every single person in Detroit has a deal. How is that equitable?” he asked.

Among other things, the biggest conduit of rainwater – miles of roads and freeways –  aren’t charged the fee, nor is the Detroit Land Bank, which owns 100,000 properties.

Then there’s Aaron Timlin, who owns a block-long brick behemoth former print shop on the west side that is now in foreclosure because of an unpaid $5,000 drainage fee.

An artist, Timlin said he plans to one day convert the building into a community center. Its boarded windows are decorated with portraits of Rosa Parks, former Mayor Hazen Pingree, Malcolm X and other civil rights leaders.

He contends the rain fee unfairly targets members of Detroit’s creative community, who have converted empty warehouses and industrial buildings into studios and are now hit with big fees.

Timlin, executive director of the Contemporary Art Institute of Detroit, said he’s in disbelief because, not only was his building unconnected to the city’s water system, it hasn’t had a roof since he bought it in 2005.

Nor does it have a parking lot. So where is it draining water?

“This is a city built on cars and freeways,” Timlin said.

“And now the city is taxing us for concrete.”

Like what you’re reading in Bridge? Please consider a donation to support our work!

We are a nonprofit Michigan news site focused on issues that impact all citizens. In an era of click bait and biased news, we focus on taking the time to learn both sides of a story before we post it. Bridge stories are always free, but our work costs money. If our journalism helps you understand and love Michigan more, please consider supporting our work. It takes just a moment to donate here.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Comments

Kevin Grand
Mon, 03/04/2019 - 7:09am

And exactly where was all of this faux "outrage" when the GLWA was jammed down S.E. Michigan's throat?

The same that violated no less than three sections of the Michigan Constitution when it was imposed without our consent (Art 3, Sec 5, Art 3, Sec 6, Art 7, Sec 28)?

The same that also mandated the WRAP fee to cover those who didn't want to pay their water bill?

You reap what you sow.

Rob Pollard
Mon, 03/04/2019 - 7:50am

Do we really need BS, clickbait headlines at Bridge? It's unbecoming what I consider a real news organization.

They are not charging them for "rain" -- as the story notes, it's to remove the stormwater. It's something many people and businesses just might assume gets taken care of magically, but it doesn't. It requires hundreds of millions of dollars.

Ken Tokarz
Mon, 03/04/2019 - 12:05pm

You are right in that they are not being charged for rain, residents would be responsible for the fee if we had a drought this summer. Rain or shine you pay the bill

Bob Potocki
Mon, 03/04/2019 - 8:43am

Wow. This is almost as bad as Livingston County Sewers. Only it's worse out here in the land of insider deals. Market rigging at its worst. Just follow the money. What drains were built, what did they cost. And how did that spending get approved. THINKING WAYNE COUNTY JAIL.

Don
Mon, 03/04/2019 - 8:57am

If the rain water is going into the municipal sewer system then Detroit is in voliation of the clean water act and needs to be paying finds. Strom water CAN NOT go into the Sewer system!!!!Polluted stormwater runoff is commonly transported through municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s), and then often discharged, untreated, into local water bodies.

Recent Developments
EPA signs final MS4 General Permit Remand Rule. Visit our stormwater rules and notices page to read the rule and related materials.

An MS4 is a conveyance or system of conveyances that is:
owned by a state, city, town, village, or other public entity that discharges to waters of the U.S.,
designed or used to collect or convey stormwater (e.g., storm drains, pipes, ditches),
not a combined sewer, and
not part of a sewage treatment plant, or publicly owned treatment works (POTW).
To prevent harmful pollutants from being washed or dumped into MS4s, certain operators are required to obtain NPDES permits and develop stormwater management programs (SWMPs). The SWMP describes the stormwater control practices that will be implemented consistent with permit requirements to minimize the discharge of pollutants from the sewer system.

Don
Mon, 03/04/2019 - 9:09am

Does not Mike Duggan keep sayiing he tore down 100,000 house every year>>>> These are not vacant lots and asorb water<<< This BS is just another way for Mike to fell HIS pockets like with the House demos>>> were $10,000.00 a house before Mike now over $27,000.00!!!!

Jimmy
Mon, 03/04/2019 - 9:32am

DWSD is taxing permeable surfaces to reduce run-off. You would think that the article would at least ask the question of whether these interviewees can reduce their permeable surface in some way, or even examine the lots being taxes.

To take an example, the 8 Mile shopping center parking lot is enormous, and that's why the Belmont water bill is so high. But there's absolutely no mention of that in the article, and you'd think it would be an interesting question.

Part of a pattern I see from many articles in Bridge, to be honest. Some really good exploration of the issues, but obvious questions or follow ups are left completely hanging.

Jen
Mon, 03/04/2019 - 2:05pm

Agreed...no mention of Green Infrastructure to reduce impervious surfaces and provide filtration before discharging to the river.

Don
Sun, 03/10/2019 - 9:37am

Jimmy just look at all the vacant land now that is in Detroit,,,, There would be more if Duggan did not raise the cost to take down vacant house from $10,000.00 to $27,000.00! Drive around Detroit NOT just on I-75 or the major roads like Woodward ! Lots of farm land in Detroit NOW!!!

Angie
Mon, 03/04/2019 - 9:45am

This sounds like a sad case of poor planning and unintended consequences.
Combined sewer systems, crumbling infrastructure, decades of complacency and underfunding have resulted in a huge mess that no one wants to pay for because of the common belief that water should be free and toilets should work.
Clean air, water, and food have a cost. Unfortunately, we have to pay for past neglect as well as for future improvements. How to share the pain is what we elect leaders to figure out.

Matt
Mon, 03/04/2019 - 10:27am

Understanding the importance of what is trying to be accomplished, the good news is with all the vacant, abandoned and even city owned properties they have lots of places to locate detention ponds.

Ben W. Washburn
Tue, 03/05/2019 - 6:41pm

Yes Matt. Run-off retention ponds are a part of the answer, but they too are both expensive and also hazardous within residential areas, and most often more expensive than any other alternative. And you have to charge many of the poorest people in this State to pay for these improvements. There are no easy answers. All of us need to become a whole lot better informed about this issue, and hopefully, Joel Kurth and Bridge Magazine, is our best bet to reach that common and higher level of understanding. I've read each of the 19 comments which have previously been made, and each is steeped in blithe ignorance of a challenge which has festered for the past 80 years. For a more general, recent, and well-informed background piece on National Public Radio, go to: https://www.apmreports.org/story/2019/07/great-lakes-water-shutoffs

Ken Tokarz
Mon, 03/04/2019 - 10:42am

This article needs to be updated to include the impact of drainage fees that Detroit Public Schools Community District pays annually for drainage fees . The district is not exempt and pays in excess of $5,000,000.00 annually for buildings they occupy and buildings that sit vacant . If the city is uly committed to the schools, occupied buildings should be exempted if the dollars are used to pay for roofs and windows on existing. Wayne county successfully exempted roads so it can be done.

Res ipsa loquitur
Mon, 03/04/2019 - 11:52am

The imposition of a new and exorbitant "rainwater drainage fee" is merely Duggan once again demonstrating financial sleight of hand.

William Bailey
Mon, 03/04/2019 - 1:24pm

Meanwhile, the sewers overflow with the increased rainfall, flushing sewage into the Detroit River

Tom
Mon, 03/04/2019 - 7:40pm

Like many cities, Detroit’s sewers are combined - I am not sure this is true; most cities have worked hard to separate combined systems, clean up wastewater, and reduce runoff. Detroit is behind the times; compare it with Buffalo, another Great Lakes city.

Joel Kurth
Mon, 03/04/2019 - 7:47pm

Hi Tom: Thanks for the comment. As the article notes, many older, industrial cities in the Midwest and Northeast still have combined sewer systems, and there are 700-plus nationwide that fit that category, according to Manhattan Institute.

James F Bish
Mon, 03/04/2019 - 10:04pm

I have not talked to anyone in my neighborhood who enjoyed a drainage fee reduction as a result of the changes.

N
Mon, 03/04/2019 - 10:32pm

I’m disappointed in the clickbait headline and the lack of serious inquiry into this issue. Detroit is far from the first city to implement such a measure. The idea that this is a money grab is promulgated without much question in this piece. State and federal help are not forthcoming. What solutions besides paying for something that costs money are identified? The article mentions green infrastructure exactly once. I expect more of Bridge.

Save Me
Tue, 03/05/2019 - 2:32am

Detroit needs to Government

Jason D
Tue, 03/05/2019 - 11:51am

Great news! If this doesn't upset you, you'll get to pay an additional $0.45/gal tax on fuel soon as well!!! Everyone wants more government until they realize that just means more costs and taxes. Just make sure you forget your outrage at the next election and vote for more big government!

Iman Azol
Wed, 03/06/2019 - 3:55pm

The Demorrhoids have had total control of this city since 1948. Every failure, expense, runaway crime, job flight, infrastructure collapse, the poverty, water quality, all of it, is 100% the fault of the Demorrhoid Party. If you don't like it, stop voting for the party of failure. Until then, you deserve everything that happens to you, you voted for it.

AverageJoe
Thu, 03/07/2019 - 12:10am

Its being run by democrats.. and has been run into the ground.

Tell me Detroit, what do you have to lose by trying something else?

Don
Sun, 03/10/2019 - 9:32am

The clean water act came out in the 1970!! nWith federal $ to comply!!! What happen to all the Millions that Detrot got??????