Business and Lansing need to help the other to expand childcare for working parents

Businesses in some Michigan communities are pooling resources to provide quality child care for their workers. (Bridge photo by Lindsay VanHulle)

GRAND RAPIDS — Five years ago, John Wilson formed a private family foundation and set out to help lift people out of poverty in Mason County, on Lake Michigan north of Muskegon.

Wilson's group, The Pennies from Heaven Foundation, helped organize an employer resource network serving 12 companies and about 20 percent of the local workforce. Such networks are cropping up around Michigan as tools for employers to pool resources and tackle barriers that keep their workers from holding down a job, from transportation to housing to child care.

Wilson estimates the foundation invested about $300,000 to open Oaktree Academy, a nonprofit child care center housed inside a former school in Ludington, and another $100,000 annually to operate it.

The Grand Rapids Area Chamber of Commerce and Talent 2025, a West Michigan-based business coalition focused on finding and developing talent, hosted a panel discussion on Monday with state lawmakers, researchers and Wilson about how to get business leaders engaged in helping working families find child care.

"We need to start thinking about different solutions," said Wilson, CEO of Western Land Services Inc., an oil and gas leasing company in Ludington.

Wilson is an example of a business leader attempting to move the needle on helping Michigan families access affordable child care — something that eludes many families in the state, due to availability or cost.

MORE COVERAGE: 6 ways to help working parents in Michigan afford child care

Full-time care for an infant in Michigan can cost close to $10,000 per year on average, based on estimates from the Economic Policy Institute. The Michigan Association of United Ways found in a recent report highlighting barriers faced by the state's working poor that bare-minimum child care for an infant and a preschooler cost $1,108 per month in 2015.

In Detroit, billionaire Dan Gilbert's family of companies is looking to expand a child care center inside the One Campus Martius building — home to Quicken Loans Inc. employees — to its other developments around the city. In Lansing, Jackson National Life Insurance Co. has operated an onsite child care center for 17 years. In Ottawa and Allegan counties, private foundations and businesses have donated more than $1 million toward scholarships for families to offset child care tuition.

The private sector increasingly views the issue as a way to attract and keep talented employees. But it's an expensive undertaking, one that neither business leaders nor government can solve alone, as panelists on Monday discussed.

The state spends about $160 million a year to serve close to 30,000 children, said Michelle Richard, a vice president at Lansing-based Public Sector Consultants, "which sounds great — except that 15 years ago, we served three times as many children."

Michigan has some of the tightest limits in the country on who can qualify for subsidies, and ranks near the bottom of states for both income eligibility for families and the amount it reimburses daycare providers for the care they give.

The state will use $5.5 million in federal funds this fiscal year to increase income eligibility for families earning child care subsidies from 125 percent of the federal poverty level to 130 percent, according to the nonpartisan House Fiscal Agency.

Lawmakers also budgeted another $19.4 million in state and federal funds to slightly boost reimbursement rates to child care providers.

Even so, those rates are still less than what families pay in tuition, Richard said.

State Sen. Goeff Hansen, R-Hart, and chair of the Senate's K-12, school aid and education appropriations subcommittee, said he wanted to give higher rate increases to higher-rated child care providers to incentivize other caregivers to improve quality and give children more educational opportunities.

Throwing more money at a problem won't solve the problem by itself, said state Rep. Rob VerHeulen, R-Walker. Policymakers need to also look at using taxpayer dollars to achieve better outcomes.

"We do need to expand eligibility, increase reimbursement rates and streamline regulations," VerHeulen said, "but let's try to do it in a smart way so we're getting the maximum bang for every dollar."

Hansen asked if there's a role for business leaders to play in forming public-private partnerships around child care. Reimbursing providers at higher rates costs millions of dollars and only hikes rates by a small amount, Hansen said. He asked whether businesses that invest in child care could be given some kind of tax credit as an incentive to make an investment of their own.

"This benefits all businesses. If your employee comes to work every single day, that's a huge plus. If they don't have to worry about having quality child care … that's a big plus," said Hansen, adding: "(Let's) start talking about breaking down some of these silos that we always have between government and business."

Wilson, of the foundation in Mason County, said his region views child care as a "ministry." The region encourages businesses and organizations to share resources and is trying to bring churches into the equation, he said.

Business leaders bring an evidence-backed, free-market approach to making decisions "not necessarily (done) by the people in Lansing," said state Sen. Peter MacGregor, R-Rockford.

"We need their ideas, we need their thoughts," MacGregor said, "because that's how we're going to come up with good policy."

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Karin Cooney
Thu, 10/26/2017 - 2:06pm

Everyone benefits when workers show up for their jobs. Access to child care is an economic driver. We need to work together to help solve this issue for our communities.

Erwin Haas
Thu, 10/26/2017 - 7:00pm

The "child care centers" referred to are huge, hugely expensive, destroy children's childhood and which, when seen from the health point of view, pestilence houses.
The underlying reasons come from well meaning, but dysfunctional state regulations. These mandate the licensing of the center and of the personal, forcing these places to become industrialized, noisy, chaotic, impersonal commercial sites. They are located on main streets, have a inane, one size fits all approach to herding these infants and little kids around, and hopefully make money for the proprietor.
The folks who work there are poorly paid, but its the best job that these crones can hold. There is nothing noble about handling 10-2 or 3 year olds in a room with junk everywhere, kids with runny noses, fighting, crying, and goaded into frenzy by the constant motions and noise around them.
The incidence of infectious diseases among the victims of these establishments that are imposed by government fiat is astonishing; hepatitis, CMV, colds and flu are epidemic and these predictably spread to the parents.
The state demands standards that set these horrors into motion. Proponents, all making money off this scam, sneer at the stay at home mom, or retired grandma, who takes in 2 or 3 kids and charges only 50 or 75 dollars per week all because "she's not regulated" and "who knows what could happen."
I'd suspect that the off the books child care businesses are very active, that the parents rapidly recognize problems and avoid them, and that in fact there are long term bonds of trust that develop between the parents, kids and the small private entrepreneurs who eke out livings and still enjoy seeing the same kid in a quiet, loving and nourishing home.
I'd guess that there are a huge number of private homes that would soak up the kids in the commercial, nerve racking sick houses that the state imposes. It would require allowing the simple solutions that caring parents would soon gravitate towards soon enough.