Inspired by Parkland, a surge in young voter registration in Michigan

A mass shooting that left 17 dead in Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School has led to outpouring of grief, calls for gun control and a surge in young voter registration

Bloomfield Hills High School student Malik Salman cast his first ballot in the August gubernatorial primary. “ It makes me feel like I have a voice,” he said. (Courtesy photo)

Related: Could this be the year Michigan college students actually vote?

With every election cycle, political parties harbor a fantasy: that like-minded young people will shed their reputation as voting slackers and, finally, play a key role in the party’s victory.  

Registration data obtained by Bridge Magazine suggests 2018 may well deliver on the long-promised youth vote in Michigan. And if so, it looks like advantage Democrats.

Michigan voter registration surged earlier this year among young adults ages 18 to 29,  according to an analysis provided to Bridge by TargetSmart, a national Democratic polling firm. The numbers suggest that much of the rise, at least early in the year, is tied to the Feb. 14 high school shootings in Parkland, Florida that killed 17 people, mostly students.

According to TargetSmart, this younger age group accounted for 34.4 percent of newly registered Michigan voters in the 15 weeks before the shootings at Marjory Stoneman High School. Over the same time period after the tragedy, that share jumped to 41.7 percent, an increase of 7.3 points in newly minted young voters.

Over that combined time period, more than 130,000 young adults were added to Michigan voting rolls, including activist-minded high school students inspired by the activism of the Parkland survivors as well, they say, as dissatisfaction with the Trump administration.  

Former Michigan Democratic Party Chair Mark Brewer, unsurprisingly, said he was not surprised by the numbers.

“I’ve seen an upsurge in high school Democratic activity,” Brewer said. “It’s sad that the motivating factor was a terrible shooting in Florida. But if it leads to new registrations among young people, that’s great.”

The increase in Michigan mirrors trends that TargetSmart identified in young enrollment in several battleground states. The post-Parkland share of young voter sign-ups rose by 16 points in Pennsylvania; 11 points in New York and Virginia; 10 points in Indiana and 8 points in Florida.

Overall, in the 39 states in which TargetSmart initially obtained data, the firm found an average increase in young voter registration of 2 points. The firm qualified its data by noting it provided merely an “early quantitative sign” that youth turnout would be on the rise in the midterms.

TargetSmart’s report likewise didn’t examine how state ballot issues in Michigan, including the legalization of recreational marijuana and make voting easier, may impact youth registration (which remains open) and turnout in November.

While the voting patterns of young adults vary, they share a common thread: Broadly speaking, they tend to favor Democrats.

A national survey in April by Harvard University’s Institute of Politics found:

  • 69 percent of 18-to-29-year-olds favored Democrats compared to 28 percent who favored Republicans.
  • Among Democrats under 30, 51 percent said they “definitely” planned to vote, compared to 36 percent of Republicans.
  • Nearly two-thirds of all young voters surveyed favor gun safety reform
  • 72 percent disapproved of President Trump’s job performance.

Republicans: We’re not dead yet

Michigan Republicans, however, said they are not about to cede the battle for young hearts and minds to their rivals.

“I would not say that young voters belong to Democrats by any stretch,” said Colleen Pero, chief of staff for the Lansing-based Michigan Republican Party. “People may peddle that, but when I look out there I see a lot of enthusiasm among young (Republican) voters.”

“Three weeks ago, I had 14 presidents of (Republican) college clubs sitting in our conference room at 8 a.m. They’re fired up and ready to go. They are putting out game plans.”

Pero said she also sees strong support from young adults a few years out of college, as they begin professional careers. She acknowledged some might not like President Trump’s tweets, but they do like the economy.

“They’ve seen their 401(k) grow over the years. They may not like the tone (of a divisive White House) but they like the results.”

At Michigan State University, Aleks Oslapas, the College Republicans chairman, said he sees plenty of support for the GOP agenda, with more than 200 students joining the Republican club in late August.

Aleks Oslapas, chair of the Michigan State University College Republicans, says conservative and Libertarian students are "very energized" by President Trump. (Courtesy photo)

“We are going to make sure they are all registered to vote. Obviously, there a lot of (young) people who are Republicans and I think a lot of that is going back to the Obama administration.”

Trump, he said, might be a motivating force for both sides. “I think it’s a positive and a hindrance,” he said of Trump’s conduct in office.

Oslapas said he’s also seeing “more libertarian Republicans. They have a gun permit but they can’t carry on campus. They associate that with liberal policies,” he said, referring to state law that bans concealed carry in schools and colleges.

Will they show up?

A wave of young Michigan voters likely bolsters the Democratic Party’s chances of taking the Michigan governor’s seat. Nominee Gretchen Whitmer already leads GOP Attorney General Bill Schuette in a recent poll by a comfortable margin. Democrats also are given a chance of flipping control of the state House, where they would need to gain nine seats to wrest control from the GOP’s 63-47 majority.

Veteran Michigan political analyst Bill Ballenger threw a note of caution, however, on expectations for a surge in young voters this fall.

“Any uptick or surge is probably good for the Democrats,” said Ballenger, publisher of the Ballenger Report. “They do better with this cohort than Republicans.”

But he added: “The record of 18-to-35 voters in terms of turning out is terrible. Even if you get them registered, that doesn’t mean they will turn out.”  

Raising again, for Ballenger at least, the eternal question: “Are they going to show up in November?”

A deep dive into who cast ballots in the 2016 presidential election underscores Ballenger’s skepticism.

According to the U.S. Census, older voters across the country were far more likely to cast votes than younger age groups, with 71 percent of citizens 65 and older voting in 2016, compared with 46 percent of 18-to-29-year-olds.

Age-old U.S. voting patterns

What share of Americans voted, by age, in the 2016 election:  

18-29: 46 percent

30-44: 59 percent

45-64: 67 percent

65 and up: 71 percent

Source: U.S. Census.

Even in an era of hyper-partisanship, in which cable news hyperventilates over every presidential (or unpresidential, depending on your view) tweet, not every young person is dead set on voting in November.

Bridge interviewed a dozen students at Grand Valley State University. Most said they were registered and planned to vote. But there were others who said they were registered to vote but may not do so on election day.

Rachel Wayne, a senior who said she “probably leans conservative,” told Bridge she hasn’t “been paying much attention to what’s going on, truth be told,” what with having to juggle two jobs as she enters her final semester of nursing school.

“I haven’t made it a priority to look into the candidates like I should,” she said. “It’s probably bad.”

GVSU engineering graduate student Sarah Barnes said she’s not registered – to the chagrin of a friend sitting across a table in the student commons. Barnes, 25, cited the demands of school, a job, her puppy and paying bills.

“I can’t make an informed decision, because I haven’t been paying attention,” she said. “I wouldn’t say I am not interested. I would just say I have other priorities.”

Over in Ann Arbor, University of Michigan political science professor Edie Goldenberg said she was startled to learn just 14 percent of U-M students voted in the 2014 Michigan midterm elections. She said she set out to double the share this year, forming a Big Ten challenge to see which conference school could register the most students.

“As a political science professor, I felt like somehow I hadn’t been doing my job very well. The students care about issues, many of them passionately. But they don’t seem to connect the dots between the issues they care about and the elected officer-holder.”

University of Michigan political science professor Edie Goldenberg: “Students don’t seem to connect the dots between the issues they care about and the elected officer-holder.” (Courtesy photo)

The voter drive has thus far registered 10,000 U-M students, Goldenberg said.

But Goldenberg, and others, contend that college students are discouraged by state laws that make it harder for them to vote.

Michigan doesn’t have early voting and it can be “unusually difficult for first-time voters to get an absentee ballot,” she said.

She took note that 60 percent of U-M students registered to vote in 2014 – while less than a fourth bothered to cast ballots.

In August, Democratic students at U-M and Michigan State University filed a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of a state law that requires them to vote according to the address on their driver’s license rather than by where they attend school. The law, they contend, was intentionally enacted by Republicans to suppress registration and turnout of college students.  

‘I feel like I have a voice’   

In the meantime, party-affiliated and nonpartisan groups are mobilizing to drive up voter registration among young adults in advance of the Oct. 9 deadline for registering in Michigan.

That includes several groups led by first-time voters.

A pair of students at Bloomfield Hills High School launched a nonprofit in February called Engage18, aimed at getting students involved in the political process. A voter registration drive held in March signed up 140 students.

Senior Malik Salman, 18, was among those who registered that day. He cast the first ballot of his life in the August Democratic primary.

“Voting was awesome,” Salman said. “My dad grew up in the Middle East and he really didn’t get the opportunity to engage in politics. In the United States, it’s a privilege and a right to be able to vote. It makes me feel like I have a voice.”

Salman said many of his classmates were motivated to register by the Parkland shootings, which spurred a national student-led movement to address school gun violence.

“That was a big factor,” Salmon told Bridge. “Seeing a lot of my peers get involved made me motivated and made me feel like we had a common cause.”

Salman said he voted for progressive Abdul El-Sayed for governor in the primary, and plans to support Democratic nominee Whitmer this fall. “It wouldn’t make much sense to vote for El-Sayed and then switch to Schuette,” the teen said.

He, too, says he’s mindful of the reputation that attaches to young voters.

“Every year, they make that prediction (more young people will vote) and every year it doesn’t come true,” he said. “But I think this year may be different in Michigan. I’ve seen many young people my age get involved.”

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Thu, 09/13/2018 - 12:10pm

For those who need an easy, complete way to learn about the candidates and issues on their ballot, go to, by the League of Women Voters. Non partisan and very informative. Also has info on obtaining an absentee ballot, polling locations, etc. Check it out!

Thu, 09/13/2018 - 1:12pm

The foregoing Bridge article recounts that a GVSU student has neglected to register to vote due to her apparently overwhelming "demands of school, a job, her puppy and paying bills." A U of M poli sci professor is quoted as rationalizing and seemingly justifying such student lassitude and disinterest in voting due to "state laws that make it harder for them to vote" and the "difficulty for first-time voters to get an absentee ballot." One can hardly be blamed for wondering if there has been some genetic deterioration in the stamina and aptitude of the current student generation. As a 1960's undergraduate in D. C., as a graduate student in Ann Arbor, then while stationed overseas in the Army, I don't recall encountering the slightest difficulty in voting by absentee ballot in every election in my northern Michigan home town during that entire period. Bridge's depressing report is cause for concern for the future of our democracy.

Thu, 09/13/2018 - 2:39pm

Of course there is a solution (but not one the Republican Party would ever support):
Make Election Day a holiday or on weekend! Why is it important to Republicans to make voting as hard as possible?
Better yet make it on-line like so many other countries.
Too simple a solution for the GOP.

Thu, 09/13/2018 - 3:32pm

Bob - I think you make a good point about your commitment when you were younger versus some of the excuses made by the quoted students. However, I would point out that Michigan does seem to intentionally make it harder for first-time voters. In Michigan, you are prevented from voting via absentee ballot if you are voting in your first election, unless you read some very small print that seems to allow you to bypass this restriction if you register to vote in person with your local registrar. Many students turn 18 while they are away at college or just before they go off to college. If they did not register to vote in person with their registrar (and tell them to document this) they will be denied an absentee ballot if voting in their first election. My daughter recently turned 18 and knew she would be in another part of the country attending College during the election this fall. We almost did not catch this restriction. She went to her local registrar to register in person and explained she wanted to vote in her first election via absentee ballot. The registrar wasn't initially familiar with this restriction and basically told my daughter to remind her that she came in person to register when she requested an absentee ballot. I believe this IS unnecessarily difficult and Michigan DOES make it harder for young people to vote. The Secretary of State website is filled with instructions for the elderly, disabled and veterans (which I applaud) but there is nothing geared for the special questions college students and first-time voters have. I support early voting and no-reason absentee voting. It can be a real challenge for many voters to make it to the polls on a work and school day.

Sun, 09/16/2018 - 10:05am

Hi there, Bob. I'm a current student. The organization I helped found, Engage18, is mentioned in the article. Regarding whether or not there's been "some genetic deterioration in the stamina and aptitude of the current student generation", I'd urge you to take a look at what people, including students, are actually doing. There are people who accomplish incredibly impressive things who are current students in high school. I'm far from the most impressive of the bunch, for example, and I've independently written an amicus brief for the Michigan Supreme Court. If you don't believe me, you can read it here:

Other friends of mine have done things like organizing gubernatorial primary debates, hosting meet-and-greets with politicians from both sides of the aisle, collaborating with other groups from around the country to take action in a unified way, and more. Friends of mine are putting themselves into danger to accomplish these things, even - there was a threat made against my school's walkout, and yet hundreds still participated.

The fact of the matter is, there are deliberate barriers to voting absentee, and they're not uniform across the state. Different counties might require that the county clerk endorse a registration, for example, which adds an additional barrier, while for other counties someone the clerk deputizes would be enough. We've dealt with all of this when organizing drives like the one Malik from the article signed up in, by ensuring we have clerks who can register and endorse every student at the school.

Students are accomplishing change in a way that's arguably unprecedented. I firmly believe that if students today differ from those in the past, it's in that our resolve has strengthened and our coordination increased, enabling us to achieve to an extent never seen before.

Fri, 09/14/2018 - 6:40am

The marijuana issue on the ballot I think is going to be a major factor in young people turning out to vote.

Agnosticrat 2.0
Fri, 09/14/2018 - 6:47am

I recall that our beloved president had a hard time finding his precinct to vote in the primary having never been there before.
It matters how much money you have as to whether or not you are allowed to be too busy to make it to the polls, or who you may vote for...
“They’ve seen their 401(k) grow over the years. They may not like the tone (of a divisive White House) but they like the results.”
How many kids a couple years out of college have substantial savings in 401k’s? That’s a real finger on the pulse statement.