It’s not just Flint: Michigan lead levels up after long decline

Lead worries health officials

After nearly two decades of decline, the percent of children ages 0 to 6 tested with elevated levels of lead in their blood rose in Michigan in 2016. Although the rise was slight, from 3.4 percent to 3.6 percent, health officials said they are concerned. Some of the biggest increases occurred in parts of Detroit and Grand Rapids. Children typically get lead from dust and residue tied to old homes that have lead paint in them. Lead was banned in house paint in 1978 and removed from gasoline in 1995. Enter your city ("Lansing, MI") or city and ZIP code ("Lansing, MI 48917") into the map below to check testing levels in your community. The color coding below is for 2016.

 

For the first time since 1998, the rate of children affected by elevated levels of lead increased in Michigan in 2016, triggering alarm among public health officials and child advocates.

Though slight, the increase ‒ from 3.4 percent to 3.6 percent ‒ shows that the battle to reduce lead exposure remains important as a number of high-poverty areas in Grand Rapids, Jackson, Battle Creek, Kalamazoo, as well as Detroit, saw marked increases in exposure, according to data released by the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services.

MORE COVERAGE:  Detroit demo blitz linked to lead poisoning

“The questions are ‘What’s happening? What’s going on here?’” said Dr. Eden Wells, Michigan’s chief medical officer.

 

She said state health officials are worried that lead poisoning metrics are going "in reverse direction" from the decades-long trend downward almost everywhere.

"It's really unknown why the (percentages) are going up," Wells told Bridge.

It’s a change that is prompting action in Detroit, where the city’s health department has determined that thousands of city-ordered home demolitions may be increasing the incidence of childhood lead poisoning. In Grand Rapids, the Healthy Homes Coalition of West Michigan has been working for years to clean up homes with lead exposure. The news of a recent increase surprised local officials.

Lead paint for homes was banned in 1978 and lead in gasoline was phased out in 1995. That helped bring the statewide exposure level down from above 40 percent of children to fewer than 5 percent by 2012. But in many older homes – often in the poorest parts of cities across the state – lead paint and the dust it can create remain the biggest problems.

Organizations like Healthy Homes have worked to remediate homes in the state. But now, those efforts are not leading to lower rates.

“There have been a lot of things done in (Grand Rapids) to prevent lead exposure over the years,” said Paul Haan of the Healthy Homes Coalition in a recent news release. “While these things initially worked well, they are no longer resulting in fewer children being poisoned as they used to.”

In Flint, a national scandal exploded after a switch in municipal water sources triggered the release of lead from pipes into the city's drinking water. Flint actually has childhood lead level rates well below Detroit and Grand Rapids.

The Flint crisis drew international outrage, however, because state officials approved the water switch without taking proper safety precautions.  

Across the rest of the state, however, the culprit is not drinking water but lead dust, as the latest statewide lead numbers, made available by the state earlier this year but little noticed, show. When a child tests positive for elevated levels, health officials attempt to determine how lead got in their system and visit homes. What they typically find is lead paint.

Removing lead paint from a home – which can range from simply painting over it, to replacing windows – can cost $5,000 to $10,000, Wells said.

Like what you’re reading in Bridge? Please consider a donation to support our work!

It takes time, money, and hard work to inform Michigan readers and leaders with substantive, in-depth, future-oriented news and analysis. If you value our journalism, please consider a one-time donation or a monthly contribution. It takes just a moment to donate here. Please join the thousands of Bridge readers who are helping grow and sustain our nonprofit, in-depth public service journalism in Michigan.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Comments

Kulardenu
Tue, 11/14/2017 - 3:48pm

If you notice the water reports show increased salt in the water supply. This is corroding the older pipes faster and allowing lead to leech into water supplies. This was noted early on in the Flint River water switch over in Flint. I also noticed our salt content is up in Owosso's water and now our lead levels have went up as well. Why??? too much road salt usage???

John Smith
Wed, 12/13/2017 - 8:06am

I grew up in Flint, drinking water which came from the river until 1967. We lived in two new homes, both of which were fed via lead service lines, with no clear adverse effects.

What changed was that Flint has been run by incompetent boobs for the past 60 years. They collected water service fees for all that time but squandered them on everything except the water system. They ran a huge scam about the water treatment plant being ready for decades, it was not. The plant was staffed by people unqualified and incapable of running it. Flint's infrastructure is crumbling, with constant water line breaks. Every break introduces bacteria (Legionnaires) . The system is too big for the current population, so there are low flow rates, especial near the end of dead headed lines, preventing chlorine from reaching a high enough concentration to kill bacteria.

Everyone who could afford to leave Flint did so, and those who are left have a long history of pulling constant cons to get people outside the city to pay their way, and this water thing was self inflicted by people who live for the moment. They elect incompetent, often criminals as leaders, those leaders in turn hire incompetent staff (water plant), and then they blame others for their self inflicted problems. It is long past time to hold them accountable.