Ban open-water fish farms on Michigan’s Great Lakes

fish farm

The accidental release of farm-raised salmon in Washington shows the peril if Michigan were to allow open-water farms in our lakes, streams and rivers. Open-water farms spread disease, waste and the threat of harmful, invasive species.

Jones and Howell

Senator Rick Jones, R-Grand Ledge, represents Michigan’s 24th State Senate District. Rep. Gary Howell, R-North Branch, represents Michigan’s 82nd State House District and is chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee.

A few weeks ago, there was an unexpected open season on salmon off the coast of Washington state.

The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife took this drastic step after an open-water fish farm accidentally released thousands of farmed Atlantic Salmon into the state’s coastal waters.

While it was undoubtedly fun for the fishermen to reel in as many salmon as they could catch, it was bad news for the wild fish put at risk of disease, interbreeding, and the introduction of a potentially invasive competitor.

At this point, fortunately, scientists do not believe these farmed salmon pose a risk of becoming established in the wild. But Washington’s situation is quite similar to how a far less benign fish species took hold in North America, and both offer a cautionary tale for Michigan.

Asian Carp were originally brought in to clean aquaculture and wastewater ponds in the Mississippi Delta. All it took was one flood to unleash the fish into the Mississippi River, at which point they quickly established themselves in the wild and began devastating native fisheries and wreaking havoc on recreational and commercial fishing and boating industries.

Since then, they have spread rapidly throughout thousands of miles and are now one of the greatest threats to the Great Lakes. Earlier this year, a fully-grown carp was found just nine miles from Lake Michigan.

Along with the threat of invasive species, open-water fish farms also spread disease and degrade water quality. Aquaculture generates huge volumes of fish waste. In closed-loop systems, waste can be processed, treated, and even sold as fertilizer. But in open-water systems, as has been proposed for Michigan’s Great Lakes waters, that waste flows untreated into our clean water.

Even on a small scale, the fish farms that some have proposed for Michigan’s waters would dump thousands of pounds of concentrated, phosphorus-laden fish waste directly into the Great Lakes.

A typical 200,000 fish operation creates as much waste as a city of 65,000 people. In ocean fish farms, tides flush away a large amount of that waste. In the Great Lakes, the vast majority will remain in coastal areas where Michigan families enjoy swimming, fishing and vacationing.

After a Canadian fish farm was closed due to dangerous levels of algae growth and oxygen depletion in nearby waters. Unsurprisingly, Canadian authorities have subsequently not issued any new permits for this type of operation in more than 20 years.

We have already seen how too much phosphorus can create extreme algae blooms in the Great Lakes, like the one that shut down Toledo’s drinking water supply in 2014.

Commercial fish farms in the Great Lakes are all risk and no reward. The total Great Lakes fishery is valued at $7 billion annually and supports over 75,000 jobs among sports, commercial and tribal fisheries. On top of that, it is virtually impossible to estimate the true value of abundant clean water for everything from tourism to drinking water.

All of this would be jeopardized for an industry, which is expected to provide fewer than 50 jobs statewide. That is a terrible deal for Michigan.

Instead of permitting massive fish farms in the Great Lakes, Michigan should promote responsible aquaculture practices. Land-based, closed-loop systems can provide food and jobs without allowing waste to simply be dumped directly into our lakes and streams.

Cities like Detroit with numerous vacant buildings are prime candidates to support the creation of these contained systems and bring a thriving industry to our economy. The Great Lakes are ours to protect, and we simply cannot allow concentrated fish waste to end up in the waters of Pure Michigan.

To prevent that from happening, we have introduced legislation in the House and Senate of the Michigan Legislature to ban aquaculture facilities from setting up shop in our Great Lakes and our inland lakes and streams.

Clean water is our state’s most valuable natural resource. Michigan must be a diligent and committed steward to our Great Lakes and our most cherished waterways.

Letting fish farms set up shop in our waterways would damage our clean water, our water-based economy, and our outdoor way of life. That is a lose, lose, lose for Michigan.

Bridge welcomes guest columns from a diverse range of people on issues relating to Michigan and its future. The views and assertions of these writers do not necessarily reflect those of Bridge or The Center for Michigan. Bridge does not endorse any individual guest commentary submission.

If you are interested in submitting a guest commentary, please contact Monica WilliamsClick here for details and submission guidelines.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Thu, 09/21/2017 - 10:50am

"permitting massive fish farms" in the Great Lakes ........................... just like CNN

K.L. Kriseler
Thu, 09/21/2017 - 11:34am

Mr. Jones, I wonder where the wild fish go to the bathroom.

Thu, 09/21/2017 - 4:37pm

I do not consider this a joking matter. It has been proven over and over that open fish farms are a serious threat to water quality. Pathogens and disease that occur from cramming fish in a tight spot spread very quickly.
A closed system can be monitored and control these risks as well as be more profitable due to creating a fertilizer byproduct without endangering our native fish population which are a multi-million dollar industry. Makes no sense to take on significant risk for very limited gain, not prudent.

Bob Short
Fri, 09/22/2017 - 7:56am

Need more evidence? Check Alexandria Morton on YouTube. She beat the farms in court. The farms are dirty and disease ridden!

Larry Socie
Sun, 09/24/2017 - 8:20pm

Body waste is a function of body size. 200,000 fish vs 65,000 people suggests 50 pound fish. The Puget Sound is open water all year around. I want to see us poking holes in two feet of ice in the middle of winter gales to feed these fish. These authors write like politicians rather than someone with solid science experience.