Opinion | Let’s work together, follow science to ensure voting is safe and secure

In just a few months, Michiganders will cast their ballots in the general election. 

Few circumstances make the case for mail-in voting -- also known as absentee voting -- more urgent to our democracy than a global pandemic that has killed 148,000 Americans in five months and sickened 4.2 million more.

Farhan Bhatti, M.D. is Michigan State Lead for the Committee to Protect Medicare. Barb Byrum is Ingham County Clerk.

In addition to ensuring every voter has the option of participating in our democracy remotely, Michigan must also reimagine what in-person voting in the age of social distancing will look like. As the virus continues to take lives and bring down our economy, we can’t afford NOT to make these changes.

From a medical perspective, COVID-19 is a new virus that we are still learning about every day. What we know is the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19 can move from person to person easily, transported on microscopic droplets from coughing, talking and even just breathing, with growing evidence indicating they could also be airborne, suspended in the air as droplet nuclei. To minimize transmissions, public health experts and physicians have been urging universal mask wearing and social distancing.

Clearly, our old voting procedures alone won’t work. Neither will pretending the pandemic doesn’t exist. The more than 7.5 million registered Michigan voters deserve the right to cast their ballots without having to choose between their lives and their right to vote. 

While some politicians argue that expanding our tried and tested absentee voting system to more voters is risky, as a physician and an election official, we argue that the real risk to voting this year is the threat of sickness, even death, to voters, and not more people voting absentee.

That’s why it’s absolutely critical that we work together toward safety-first reforms, implemented quickly and comprehensively.

Michigan voters said they want their elections to be more convenient and with fewer barriers when they passed Proposal 3, which included no-reason absentee voting and same-day registration, by a 2-to-1 margin in 2018. The voters spoke, and the result is even more important during the pandemic.

The surest way to avoid exposure to COVID-19 is to stay home and away from other people. In November, the best way to do this is mailing in an absentee ballot. In addition to mailing back their completed ballots, voters should also be able to drop them off at secure locations to avoid personal contact. 

But we must also make in-person voting safer. 

Some voters, for personal or circumstantial reasons, prefer or must go to a polling location to cast their ballots. Voters who require assistance reading what’s on their ballot deserve to participate in our democracy as much as every other voter. Voters who are less likely to have a permanent address where absentee ballots can be mailed tend to vote in person more frequently as well. 

As such, policymakers can meet voters where they are, with their safety and convenience in mind, the same way small business owners, medical clinics and other establishments are adapting to better serve customers, clients and patients.

Physicians and health experts repeatedly warn against crowding people in confined, poorly ventilated indoor spaces, such as polling stations located in schools, or worse, facilities serving elderly or vulnerable people. Michigan could give local clerks more flexibility to expand the number of polling locations and the duration of voting, such as longer hours or early voting, to stagger the number of voters over several days and across more locations. 

We can avert what happened in Georgia’s June primary elections, when thousands of people waited in line for hours and thousands more were likely disenfranchised in large part because Georgia closed 214 polling locations — serving mostly Black communities.

We can avoid what happened in Wisconsin in their April primary, when their partisan Supreme Court blocked a request to delay the vote, resulting in long lines during a pandemic. At least 52 Wisconsin voters and poll workers, and likely many more, were infected with COVID-19. 

Instead of undermining the U.S. Postal Service and voters’ faith in it, politicians can strengthen our mail infrastructure so it can continue to serve all Americans in urban, suburban and rural communities -- and deliver their absentee ballots securely. Instead of fear-mongering about vote-by-mail fraud, reported only 491 times from all absentee ballots cast between 2000 and 2012, policymakers from both parties can boost voter confidence through statewide voter information efforts, something local elections officials such as Ottawa County Clerk Justin Roebuck and others are already doing.

For many, voting has never been a foregone conclusion. Poll taxes, literacy tests and voter ID restrictions have sought to suppress -- and often succeeded in suppressing -- voter participation. Erosions to the 1965 Voting Rights Act continue to prevent whole communities, mostly people of color, from practicing their right to vote as Americans. Now, a biological catastrophe threatens to derail the upcoming general election. Human chicanery and political defiance must not worsen the situation.

Instead of harping about what we can’t do, we should focus on real steps we can take to keep voting safe and secure during a pandemic. By acting now, the Legislature has an opportunity to protect people and the future of our democracy. 

Bridge welcomes guest columns from a diverse range of people on issues relating to Michigan and its future. The views and assertions of these writers do not necessarily reflect those of Bridge or The Center for Michigan. Bridge does not endorse any individual guest commentary submission.

If you are interested in submitting a guest commentary, please contact Monica WilliamsClick here for details and submission guidelines.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Fri, 07/31/2020 - 10:53am

I think you are inaccurate about potential fraud connected with mail in voting. Not absentee voting—which is fine—but mass mail-in voting . Just yesterday the president mentioned a case in Patterson New Jersey that is ongoing right now. And I also heard where a mail man was just convicted of handing out unauthorized mail -in ballots. I would just conclude that we all want a fair—well documented?—election. And an election where the results can be quickly and accurately determined. Think of the rancor that will be created by any other scenario. And again, just to underscore the phoniness, ie disingenuousness, of your position, would you really call having to present an ID at a polling place voter suppression, when ID’s are needed everywhere else to conduct business in our country?

middle of the mit
Fri, 07/31/2020 - 4:47pm

You are going to have to show me the difference between absentee ballots and mail in first. Here, I will give you a head start.


Registered voters receive a ballot two to three weeks before an election, giving time to research issues or candidates.

Voters also receive an official ballot to complete and insert into the security envelope which is placed in the ballot return envelope and signed by the voter. The ballot return envelope can be stamped and mailed or dropped off at any official drop box​ across the state. If a voter casts their ballot after the Wednesday before an election, the ballot should be left at a drop box site to ensure it's counted.

Ballots must be received by 8 p.m. on Election Day.​​​​​​​​


The only difference that I see is that you have to ask for a ballot, unless................. you are put on the permanent absentee ballot list. Then there is NO difference.

And how many examples do you have without even leaving a citation for your evidence, and then how many votes are there?

And why do we need elections quickly decided? Isn't accuracy more important than having the results right now? Haste makes waste.

With me it isn't so much about the ID as it is how many people are required to make sure your ID is correct. What used to take less than 2 minutes to fill out the voting forms, show my voter ID with a signature and they check you off the list and then you get your ballot has turned into 6 people checking your ID that takes 10-15 minutes. I can't imagine how that backs up the voting lines in large population centers. Don't you see how that makes it harder to vote or even if you take the time when there is line a mile long or longer, literally?

Especially if you just got off work and have kids to take care of?

Let people vote by mail. It's all the same. You need to have the ID to register, so they already have that.

Kevin Grand
Fri, 07/31/2020 - 5:19pm

Requiring a voter to ID themselves IS NOT "voter suppression" in any way, shape or form.

It's just like I stated on another thread, if you cash a check, walk into a federal building or buy a beer, you MUST show your ID.

NOT requiring voter ID is just asking for chaos.

middle of the mit
Sat, 08/01/2020 - 7:11pm

ID is one thing........but what does America run on? Contract law. Half the contracts you SIGN don't ask for visual ID, they just want your Signature.

Does the bank need the ID of the person who signed the check?

Why can America run on SIGNATURES, but we need ID to vote?

Kevin Grand
Mon, 08/03/2020 - 7:52pm

My bank does (it's standard policy...which is why I bank there). Until they know me by sight, then we just kibitz for a few minutes.

And when they break in new bank tellers, I need to do the whole thing all over again.

middle of the mit
Tue, 08/04/2020 - 8:03am


Does your bank need the ID of the person who signed the check you are cashing?

If you couldn't tell, that is what I was getting at. At some point in time, you have to acknowledge that America runs on signatures, don't you?