Opinion | Tuition-free college plan is smart investment in Michigan’s future

Michelle Miller-Adams

Michelle Miller-Adams is a senior researcher at the Upjohn Institute and a professor at Grand Valley State University.

Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer announced a new program this week to provide workers on the frontlines of the COVID-19 crisis with a tuition-free path to a college degree or credential. Echoing the sentiment of the GI Bill of Rights that in 1944 offered educational opportunity to soldiers returning from World War II, the “Futures for Frontliners” program was described by the governor as “our way of saying ‘thank you’ to those who have risked their lives on the frontlines of this crisis.”

Details are forthcoming, but it appears that workers without college degrees in critical fields such as health and hospitals, sanitation, transportation, security, and the food industry would be eligible for a “last-dollar” grant to complete a certificate, associate’s or bachelor’s degree. Funding would come from flexible education grants under the CARES Act as well as federal workforce training dollars.

This is not just a savvy political move — after all, it will be hard to oppose aid to essential workers who have been praised for their bravery and effort by leaders across the political spectrum. It is also a smart investment in Michigan’s future. The state has set a goal of 60 percent of its workers having degrees or credentials by 2030; today, that figure stands at 45 percent. So, any initiative that increases Michigan’s stock of educated workers will help position it for economic growth. Delays are costly; evidence suggests that recessions have long-lasting effects , penalizing distressed states and regions far into the future. Michigan had begun to grapple with its skills shortage before the crisis, passing the Michigan Reconnect act to provide tuition-free community college for adults without degrees. Funding for the program was approved in early March, but days later zeroed out as all available resources were rolled into the state’s coronavirus emergency response fund. The proposed Futures for Frontliners program will move the state part of the way toward the Michigan Reconnect vision and the broader attainment goal.

Sure, hard questions remain. Experience has shown that a simple promise of a tuition-free path to a post-secondary degree has the power to move people into degree and credential programs at high rates. Even a “last-dollar” scholarship awarded after other grant aid, as this one is likely to be, can lead to large upticks in enrollment if it is easy to understand and access. The Futures for Frontliners program will need to be structured so eligibility and usage are clear and the application process for the program is simple and streamlined.

Distributional questions will also arise. The governor and her advisers would be wise to build on what is already known about the free-college movement to create the infrastructure and messaging necessary to meet their goals.

And, of course, there is a legislative battle to come, in a setting where mistrust between the governor and the Republican-led legislature is high amid debates over emergency powers and stay-at-home orders.

Even with these challenges, there is reason to hope this cleverly framed program can be passed into law and bring benefits to workers trapped in low-wage jobs as well as to Michigan as a whole. The positive attention the proposal has received in national media also suggests that other states may consider using their federal money for the same purpose.

As with much about this crisis, states are serving as hotbeds of innovation, and governors have stepped up as creative problem-solvers. The free-college idea is eminently flexible, as the many local and state variations on it suggest. Whitmer has shown how this idea can be adapted to our current moment and offers a formula for building a better trained workforce that can help states as they emerge from crisis.

Bridge welcomes guest columns from a diverse range of people on issues relating to Michigan and its future. The views and assertions of these writers do not necessarily reflect those of Bridge or The Center for Michigan. Bridge does not endorse any individual guest commentary submission.

If you are interested in submitting a guest commentary, please contact Monica WilliamsClick here for details and submission guidelines.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


William Hammond
Fri, 05/01/2020 - 1:10pm

This is what I worry about most. Like so many of us I really miss my favorite Coffee Houses and Restaurants, my favorite Bar Burger or my favorite Coney or Cobb Salad. If we lose very many in this segment it not only affects our economy but also so many workers and it also affects our sociability. And practicing that necessary Social Distancing? That has yet to be figured out. But I will be one who is going to try everything to keep us all safe!! Hope everyone else will too!!

Fri, 05/01/2020 - 2:14pm

This seems to be more of apolitical move as the population of Michigan grows restless from the extension of the stay-at-home order. Where a measured approach should be taken, there has been knee jerk reaction.

If these workers are going to be rewarded with free tuition there need to be measures in place to require satisfactory completion and that the degree is in a field of study that will be of use upon completion.

If both are not met then there should be a way for the population who will be paying for this with tax dollars to recoup the money used which would then be wasted.

Kevin Grand
Sun, 05/03/2020 - 7:18am

And exactly how would this be paid for, Prof. Adams?

This year's budget has taken a very significant financial hit.

Next year's budget is looking even worse.

Lansing will either have to raise taxes, cut spending or float bonds kicking the first two choices down to a later date to be pay for.

So, which one will it be?