Reducing waste will make energy more affordable in Michigan

Mary Templeton

Mary Templeton is executive director at Michigan Saves , a nonprofit, and chair of the Governor’s Energy Excellence Awards Steering Committee.  

It’s been 50 years since President Lyndon Baines Johnson’s initials became the acronym for “Light Bulb Johnson,” a nickname that described the Texan’s penchant for turning off lights in the White House to reduce energy waste and save money.

When it comes to reducing energy waste, LBJ may have been ahead of his time. But since then, energy efficiency has taken on a life of its own. For example, today there are residential LED lights that use 75 percent less energy and last 25 times longer than older, incandescent lighting products used in the 1960s. In fact, if one light bulb in every U.S. home was replaced with an energy-efficient alternative, the energy saved could light three million homes for an entire year.

Fortunately, the word is out, particularly in Michigan where reducing energy waste is a top priority. After all, the cheapest energy is the energy that’s never used.

Next month, the Clean and Renewable Energy and Energy Waste Reduction Act, signed into law by Gov. Rick Snyder last December, will take effect. As its name indicates, the law elevates the role that reducing energy waste will play in making energy affordable and accessible in Michigan. The new law establishes a goal of meeting 35 percent of the state's electric needs through a combination of energy waste reduction and renewable energy by 2025.

Among other things, the law allows certain electric and natural gas providers to increase financial rebates for those who exceed the energy waste reduction performance standards outlined in the law.

Michigan’s emphasis on reducing energy waste is the result of smart policy and thoughtful action. The Governor’s Energy Excellence Awards — an initiative now in its third year — is designed to showcase how Michiganders leverage the state’s policy framework to reduce their energy waste in creative and highly successful ways.

Take, for example, Western Michigan University’s Heritage Hall in Kalamazoo. Built in 1905, Heritage Hall had become a liability and an energy hog. Never shying away from a challenge, the university decided to use the 110-year-old facility for its first LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Platinum historical renovation project.

The ground-source heat pumps selected for the project cut energy consumption in half; the water-efficient plumbing fixtures, faucets, and flush valves reduced potable water and sewage usage by 33 percent; and the HVAC and lighting system designs lowered energy consumption significantly. The university expects these changes to prevent the equivalent of 124.2 metric tons of carbon dioxide from being released into the atmosphere.

The Oscar W. Larson Company in Clarkston embarked on a similarly ambitious project, but with a focus on helping as many customers as possible take control of their energy costs. In 2015, the company helped 83 small-business customers in Southeast Michigan submit applications to the DTE Energy Efficiency Program for Business. Twelve of those customers also received a 20 percent Multi-Measure bonus, because the Oscar W. Larson Company provided them with energy-efficient lighting products and food service equipment. Altogether, the company has helped DTE Energy customers save over 2 million kilowatt hours of electricity and reap more than $284,000 worth of incentives.

At their core, these are stories of Michigan residents taking control of their energy costs by reducing waste. Thousands of people across our state are taking advantage of the state’s energy policy inducements and going even further by encouraging their friends and colleagues to take action in their homes, businesses, places of worship, or organizations.

I’m encouraging you to celebrate those individuals by nominating them for the Governor’s Energy Excellence Awards.

Nominations for the 2017 Governor’s Energy Excellence Awards are being accepted through March 31. To learn more, visit 2017 Governor's Energy Excellence Awards Nominations.

Bridge welcomes guest columns from a diverse range of people on issues relating to Michigan and its future. The views and assertions of these writers do not necessarily reflect those of Bridge or The Center for Michigan. Bridge does not endorse any individual guest commentary submission.

If you are interested in submitting a guest commentary, please contact Monica WilliamsClick here for details and submission guidelines.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Tue, 03/28/2017 - 1:38pm

The most significant step here would be to do as NYS and other states have done: get the utilities out of the solar business. Why? Because they set things up so only they can play in the solar space by screwing anyone who tries to sell them solar power. They don't want power generation competitors.

Just look sometime at DTE and their solar arrays and how anyone else is largely prohibited (via ridiculously low solar payback by DTE) from putting up an array.

Until we do this all that is done is 'nibbling around the edges' of our pending electricity crisis (that DTE wants so they can increase their monopoly footprint).

Sun, 04/02/2017 - 6:37am

Sure, reducing waste is the correct way to go. But we also need to get the NIMBY's out of the way so that projects that provide more efficient generation of energy can begin. I'm thinking things like the off shore wind generators in Lake Michigan that was resisted by those that didn't want their view disturbed, or those that fight the wind farms in the Thumb.

Sun, 04/02/2017 - 8:32am

Agreeing with this woman's ideas about reducing the cost of energy is tantamount to saying that food will cost less if we don't eat. What this country and our state needs is more energy production . Where does she think we will get the power to run our computers and charge our cars?,,,,,Out of thin air? Just would take placing a wind generator every 600 ft everywhere in our state to just handle the needs we have today. Adding more computers, cars and phones will only increase the demand for energy regardless of how many lights we turn out when we leave the room. Sometimes the wind doesn't blow and the sun doesn't then what will this woman recommend? Of course, let's all go back to living in caves....but then that would generate more smoke from the cooking fires required....would she then recommend that we douse our fires every time we go out to hunt?