Skip to main content
Michigan’s nonpartisan, nonprofit news source

Informing you and your community in 2025

Bridge Michigan’s year-end fundraising campaign is happening now! As we barrel toward 2025, we are crafting our strategy to watchdog Michigan’s newly elected officials, launch regional newsletters to better serve West and North Michigan, explore Michigan’s great outdoors with our new Outdoor Life reporter, innovate our news delivery and engagement opportunities, and much more!

Will you help us prepare for the new year? Your tax-deductible support makes our work possible!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate

Michigan bills would give farmers ‘right to repair’ tractors, equipment

man working on tractor
Some farmers complain corporations like John Deere have made it impossible to make even basic at-home equipment repairs, forcing them to waste money and time at manufacturer-approved shops. (Shutterstock)
  • A growing ‘right to repair’ movement aims to give consumers more power to fix broken stuff, and not depend on manufacturers
  • Several bills in Michigan would force companies like John Deere to let farmers to fix their tractors, avoiding company-approved shops
  • Backers say this promotes fairness and environmental responsibility, but others fear unintended consequences

Farmers at Faist Farms in Jackson County were planting their annual corn crop this spring when their John Deere tractor ground to a halt, displaying an error code. 

Hoping to diagnose the problem, Jacob Faist pulled out the manual and looked up the code. But the manual simply said to call a John Deere technician for help.

Sponsor

Faist missed two days of planting while he waited for a technician to come fix the issue.

Related:

Frustrated farmers like Faist are part of a growing “right to repair” movement across the country. They argue corporations that make everything from farm equipment to laptop computers are making it too difficult for people to repair their stuff by depriving them of the necessary tools or manuals to make their own fixes. 

Some Michigan lawmakers say that needs to change. 

At a House Agriculture Standing Committee meeting Wednesday in Lansing, lawmakers heard testimony on House Bill 4673, which would require agricultural equipment manufacturers to make diagnostics, maintenance, repair parts, tools and documentation available to owners and independent repair providers.

Rep. Reggie Miller, D-Van Buren Township, chief sponsor of the bill, called it a “common sense” move to expand options for farmers. She is still discussing concerns with manufacturers and their industry lobbyists, but said she is confident that a point of agreement is achievable.

Similar bills in the House and Senate include Democratic and Republican sponsors. Among them are twin bills championed by Senators Joseph Bellino, R-Monroe, with Sam Singh, D-East Lansing, and Representatives Dale Zorn, R-Onsted, with Donovan McKinney, D-Detroit. 

Similar right to repair laws have been introduced in at least 16 states, according to the U.S. Public Interest Research Group.  

Right to repair advocates say a corporate stranglehold on the equipment repair industry harms consumers and independent repair shops and promotes waste by forcing people to throw away easily-fixable items.

“Simply put, this bill is about making sure we have the right to fix our own farm equipment or to take our equipment to a repair professional of our choosing,” said Bob Thompson, president of the Michigan Farmers Union. “It’s about choice and fairness for farmers.”

The bill also has support from environmental groups like the Sierra Club Michigan Chapter. 

“We must design and build for durability, longevity and repair,” said Christy McGillivray, legislative and political director of the Sierra Club Michigan Chapter. “This is a next step in acknowledging our economy exists within our ecosystem, which has limits.”

Opponents of the bill disagree. Some argue the real problem is a shortage of agricultural repair technicians, while others contend the bill would hinder competition among equipment manufacturers. 

Yet others say they fear farmers would use their newfound knowledge to wrongfully modify machinery. 

“Identifying such tampering becomes a challenge, making it difficult to guarantee the safety compliance and environmental sustainability of the equipment,” said Scott Wadsworth, sales manager at Tri County Equipment, a John Deere dealer with locations throughout eastern Michigan.

But Rep. Miller disputed those arguments, noting that the bill protects manufacturers from being forced to divulge trade secrets and other important proprietary information.

Sponsor

Beyond those concerns, opponents claim the bill is unnecessary. That’s because this year, John Deere and other equipment manufacturers struck a deal with the nation’s leading farm lobby that gives farmers more freedom to make DIY repairs.

Andrew Vermeesch, legislative counsel for the Michigan Farm Bureau, said in an email the group “would like to see these agreements fully implemented” before considering bills to enshrine the right to repair in law.

That’s not a universal view among farmers, some of whom argue farmers need legal protections instead of a voluntary agreement. 

Committee members didn’t vote on Miller’s bill Wednesday, leaving it still several steps away from potential passage.

How impactful was this article for you?

Michigan Environment Watch

Michigan Environment Watch examines how public policy, industry, and other factors interact with the state’s trove of natural resources.

Michigan Environment Watch is made possible by generous financial support from:

Our generous Environment Watch underwriters encourage Bridge Michigan readers to also support civic journalism by becoming Bridge members. Please consider joining today.

Only donate if we've informed you about important Michigan issues

See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:

  • “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
  • “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
  • “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.

If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate Now