Michigan’s new PFAS rules: 5 things to know
Michigan’s more stringent PFAS drinking water standards took effect this month, making the state among the most aggressive in the nation at crafting policies to keep the so-called forever chemicals out of public water supplies.
The move means Michiganders who get their water from a municipal supply will soon have a greater degree of protection from per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), chemicals found in non-stick coating, firefighting foam and other products. The chemicals have been linked to cancer, thyroid issues and other health conditions.
The new standards also lowered the threshold for cleanup of PFAS-laden groundwater, a move designed to address contamination at the source rather than relying solely on water suppliers to remove it from already-contaminated drinking water.
Michigan’s new standards set specific limits for seven PFAS compounds.
Those limits are stricter and more comprehensive than the federal Environmental Protection Agency’s unenforceable health advisory levels, which warn against levels exceeding 70 parts per trillion for PFOS and PFOA, two of the thousands of PFAS compounds.
.Here are five things to know:
Are there municipal supplies in violation of the new standards?
We’ll know more next year, but it’s likely.
Municipal water providers are now required to test their water quarterly for the state’s regulated PFAS chemicals. A failing grade for four consecutive quarters counts as a water quality violation.
Depending upon the PFAS compound in question, Michigan’s new limits range from 6 to 400,000 parts per trillion. Michigan had previously relied upon the EPA guidance of 70 parts per trillion for two compounds, PFOA and PFOS, to regulate PFAS in drinking water. The new state standards for those two chemicals are far lower, at 8 parts per trillion for PFOA and 16 parts per trillion for PFOS.
Past testing of more than 1,700 municipal water supplies revealed that about 90 percent had no reportable concentrations of PFAS compounds. Another 7 percent had detections that didn’t exceed 10 parts per trillion total PFAS in any combination of 14 compounds.
Three percent of supplies had total PFAS concentrations over 10 parts per trillion, but below the EPA guideline of 70 parts per trillion. Supplies in the city of Parchment and at Robinson Elementary School in Ottawa County exceeded 70 parts per trillion, which triggered a state response.
Some of the “middle-tier” supplies where previous tests detected PFAS below the federal health guidelines could violate Michigan’s new, more stringent standards, said Steve Sliver, executive director of a state task force known as the Michigan PFAS Action Response Team, or MPART.
With further testing, Sliver said, “a couple dozen” systems could be required to add treatment systems or take other actions to remove PFAS from water supplies.
What if I’m not on city water?
If you get your water from a household well, state drinking water standards don’t apply.
However, Michigan has tested private drinking water wells in areas of the state with known PFAS contamination, and many Michiganders with tainted wells have either switched to municipal water or obtained filters for their home supply.
The state’s new, lower groundwater cleanup standard will help address PFAS contamination at landfills, manufacturing facilities and other common culprits that could impact private wells.
The new standards trigger cleanup at sites exceeding 8 parts per trillion of PFOA or 16 parts per trillion of PFOS. Lowering the threshold added 38 new locations to the state’s list of sites in need of cleanup, for a total of 138.
If investigators believe contamination is moving offsite and affecting residential wells, they will develop plans to assist residents, Sliver said.
“We’ll be knocking on their door,” he said, to ask if state scientists can sample their well water.
Sliver said MPART plans to hold webinars soon to give Michiganders details about response plans at the sites that joined Michigan’s cleanup list when the new standards took effect.
What if I’m not near a known PFAS site but am still worried about PFAS contamination in my well water?
Sliver said the state is developing efforts to inform private well owners about PFAS, and will assist them with getting their water tested, help them make sense of test results and consider options for filters or other solutions, from digging a deeper well to connecting to municipal water.
Is the state done looking for new PFAS contamination sites?
No. Sliver said state scientists continue to test for PFAS contamination across the state, and will add to the contaminated site list if test results identify additional locations where PFAS levels exceed the new groundwater standard.
How can I find out if there is a contaminated site in my community?
The state has published a list of all sites, along with lots of supplemental information about each one.
Michigan Environment Watch
Michigan Environment Watch examines how public policy, industry, and other factors interact with the state’s trove of natural resources.
- See full coverage
- Share tips and questions with Bridge environment reporter Kelly House
Michigan Health Watch is made possible by generous financial support from:
Our generous Environment Watch underwriters encourage Bridge Michigan readers to also support civic journalism by becoming Bridge members. Please consider joining today.
See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:
- “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
- “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
- “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.
If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!