Fact Squad | Ad ties John James’ environment record to Koch Brothers donations

John_James_Fact_Squad

Republican businessman John James has accepted money from a political action committee controlled by a family whose business dumped pet coke along the Detroit River. (Screenshot)

Big money is pouring into the race between Sen. Gary Peters and Republican John James, who is the target of an ad last week claiming his campaign is partially funded by polluters and questioning his environmental record.

The Senate Majority PAC, which has spent at least $100 million nationwide to elect Democrats, purchased the 30-second ad, “It’s No Surprise.” The spot claims James, a Farmington Hills businessman, is funded by arch-conservatives who pollute Detroit.

Most of the claims in the ad are true, and properly reflect James’ donors. But the ad is on shakier ground with claims the donations mean James doesn’t support the Great Lakes.

The Claims

The ad first introduces viewers to the Koch brothers, saying  the conservative donors “piled up loads of their waste and put our health at risk.” It claims the Koch brothers joined with the oil and gas industries to give $670,000 to James’ campaign.

 

“It’s no surprise James said he would have voted against a bill fully funding protections for the Great Lakes. … James was even for eliminating EPA regulations that keep Michigan water safe.”

The Facts

Charles Koch and his late brother David — known as the “Koch Brothers” — were  controllers of Koch Industries, one of the largest oil manufacturers in the world and heavy donors to conservative causes.

In 2013, a three-story tall, city block wide, pile of petroleum coke — a byproduct of oil refinement — piled up in the Detroit River in southwest Detroit. The pile was owned by Koch Carbon, one of the companies owned by the brothers.

According to the Environmental Protection Agency, inhaling petroleum coke “can affect the heart and lungs and cause serious health effects.”

According to campaign finance documents, James’ campaign this cycle has received:

  • $527,293 from a political action committee founded by the Kochs, Americans for Prosperity Action as of Oct. 12

  • $5,000 from Koch Industries

  • $118,754 from the oil and gas industry as of Oct.12, according to Open Secrets, a site that tracks donations.

That totals $651,047, short of the $670,000 cited in the ad. The Senate Majority PAC told Bridge the tally includes $66,745 that James received from the oil and gas industries in his 2018 campaign against Sen. Debbie Stabenow. That brings the total to nearly $718,000.

The claim about James opposing protections for the Great Lakes does not tell the entire story, though. 

Related: Election Tracker | Trump on Gov. Whitmer: She wants to be a dictator

In 2018, Congress passed a $1.3 trillion omnibus spending bill, avoiding a government shutdown and covering everything from border security to infrastructure spending. The bill also included $300 million for the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, a cleanup program. 

James, who was campaigning against Stabenow at the time, opposed the bill.

“We can't continue to ignore the debt and this insane process of scrambling at the LAST minute for a vote. Congress must come up with a better process,” he wrote on Twitter.

James never mentioned the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative as part of his opposition to the bill.

“It is completely false to say John James doesn’t support funding for our Great Lakes. For him, $300 million is table-stakes for taking care of our Great Lakes and he would support increased investment,” James spokesperson Abby Walls told Bridge.

James is also a critic of the Waters of the US rule, which subjects the Great Lakes and many streams and rivers statewide to the Clean Waters Act that includes stronger regulations about pollutants and farm runoff.  On his website, James calls the rule “an example of burdensome federal overreach that restricted family farmers’ operations.” 

“James is special interest polluters’ hand-picked candidate because they know he’d be a reliable vote against protecting our environment and blocking funding for our Great Lakes,” Peters campaign spokesperson Vanessa Valdivia told Bridge Michigan.

James’ campaign accused Peters of being a “hypocrite” because he once owned $19,000 in stock of French energy company Total S.A., which produces petroleum coke. When he was running for Senate in 2014, he said he wasn’t going to sell the stock because it “has nothing to do with the Detroit situation.” Peters sold all of his shares of the company in April, 2019.

Conclusion

No doubt, John James has received a lot of donations from the oil and gas companies, comprising about 3 percent of the at least $20 million his campaign has raised so far.

It’s fair for political ads to point out those donations and ask whether they are connected to James’ opposition of some regulations that would protect the environment. 

It may be a stretch, though, to say it’s “no wonder” James would have voted against funding the Great Lakes Restoration Project, since he didn’t explicitly speak out against it. 

But in fairness, he didn’t champion it either.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Comments

Math Sux
Fri, 10/16/2020 - 6:27am

Call pet coke dirty. Call it an eye sore. Yes, it is hazardous, too. But, it is also a useful product, in fact the cement plants in Alpena and Charlevoix, both major employers and companies with global reputations for producing a quality product, use pet coke in the cement making process. That cement is then used for building our communities, upgrading our roads, expanding the new lock at the Soo, and likely even in your backyard post holes or masonry projects.

Should the pile have been moved? Probably...but, then again, don't look too hard because there are some awfully big piles of coal that are going to be converted to another type of coke sitting on Zug Island (the coke ships from the back of the island in the Old River to keep things more presentable for an unknowing public).

jonsnana
Fri, 10/16/2020 - 10:32am

I am amazed that Bridge considers itself to be a nonpartisan publication. Some of the verbiage is obviously slanted and conclusions are drawn from the absence of facts. Example: "it may be a stretch." Biased language and editorial conclusion. I learned in high school journalism class to recognize words designed to persuade. Guess I'll have to cancel my subscription. It's too bad because the idea of a truly journalistic publication is intriguing but at the end of the day, impossible when it comes to the indoctrination by the MSM.

Sheila T
Mon, 10/19/2020 - 8:54am

James is against abortion in cases of rape and incest. Must be nice to be a man.

John M
Tue, 10/20/2020 - 12:45pm

I think in striving to be fair, this review downplayed how little James is independent of whatever he is told is GOP national policy. That cop out that he did not single out the Great Lakes Cleanup money as an exception to his opposition to the funding bill, means nothing in substance. There is no reason for a Michigander to elect someone of no experience and no independence like James to serve as a Senator for the state in his first political position. Let him work his way up like Peters did. James is not a creditable candidate.