Before Flint, a Detroit-area water warning system was allowed to crumble

Years before the crisis in Flint, before the newfound appreciation across the state and nation for quality drinking water, Detroit-area residents quietly enjoyed the protection of what was considered the most sophisticated water monitoring system in America.

Stretching from Port Huron to Monroe, high-tech sensor equipment first installed in 2006 provided real-time information on the waterways that serve as the drinking water source for more than 4 million people in southeast Michigan.

Fourteen water processing plants on the St. Clair River, Lake St. Clair and Detroit River relied on this interconnected early warning system to detect oil spills, chemical leaks from upstream industrial plants or other contaminants flowing into intake pipes.

The beneficiaries of this notification network were homes and businesses in Wayne County, the most populated areas of Macomb and Oakland counties, and portions of St. Clair, Washtenaw and Monroe counties. The largest drinking water provider involved, by far, was Detroit, with its massive grid of pipes and water mains extending many miles into the suburbs.

But just as quietly as it was built, this Huron-to-Erie water warning system has been allowed to crumble in recent years as state and federal funding ran dry.

Local officials in many of communities along this water corridor balked at paying for the operation and maintenance of this pollution-monitoring network. The price tag? Twenty-five cents a year.

That’s the annual surcharge supporters say would have been tacked onto water bills of households in these communities to keep the high-tech monitors running once state and federal funding ran out.
“It was frustrating,” said Ken DeBeaussaert, director of the state’s Office of the Great Lakes, within the Department of Environmental Quality.

“People who were involved in this project felt good about seeing the government work well at all levels to cobble together this system.

“But,” he added, alluding to the recent crisis involving lead in Flint’s drinking water, “generally people have a false sense of security. They just assume that when they turn on the tap, the water is going to be safe.”

Budget concerns weren’t the only factor in the decision of some communities to leave the network. According to a 2012 article in Municipal Sewer & Water, a trade magazine, some munipalities along the water corridor said they were frustrated by inconsistent data, or concluded that their own monitoring equipment was sufficient and they didn’t need to partner with other communities.

A 2012 attempt in the state Legislature to save the Huron-to-Erie water monitoring consortium failed.

A fear of ‘chemical valley’

For 14 years, Doug Martz, who served as chairman of the now-defunct Macomb County Water Quality Board, had championed the need for continuous water quality monitoring, citing industrial dangers upstream on the Canadian side of the St. Clair River, where Sarnia’s so-called “Chemical Valley” has roughly 60 petrochemical plants along or near the waterfront.

In 2002, Martz noted, more than 700 chemical spills originating from Sarnia had occurred over a 16-year period. But water plant operators on the U.S. side were often kept in the dark, which created momentum among southwest Michigan communities for a system that would sound the alarm when contaminants are detected.

Then, word of more frightening spills.

In 2003, during the massive blackout that hit the northeastern United States and parts of Canada, a spill of vinyl chloride, a carcinogen, by Royal Polymers in Sarnia went unreported for five days. The size of the discharge was never determined.

The next year, widely dispersed discharge by Imperial Esso 1,200 barrels of toxic solvents known as MEK and MIBK, forced nine water plants on the St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair to temporarily shut down. This spill, on Super Bowl Sunday, prompted State Police to activate an emergency response center and warn the public in the affected area via cable television not to drink tap water.

The succession of spills, with no sirens going off, generated momentum among elected officials for an interconnected warning system.

After consulting with the military, petrochemical companies and the shipping industry, metro Detroit water officials selected more than 100 contaminants they wanted quickly detected by the system’s sensors and probes, along with seven broad metrics to gauge water quality, including pH levels and water turbidity (clarity).

The safety monitors were hailed as a marvel, a robotic version of the canary in a coal mine, providing continuous, real-time reports that would trigger an alarm to water plants downstream if there was a change in water quality that would allow them, if need be, to temporarily shut down. The clean-water project was also a model of transparency, providing data every 15 to 30 minutes which was quickly posted on a public website.

One environmental consultant who worked on the project concluded that the approved system, largely completed in 2010, was “more robust and advanced” than the nation’s second-best network, which has protected hundreds of miles of the Ohio River for more than two decades.

Homeland Security advocates liked the way the system could thwart terrorist efforts to poison drinking water. Environmentalists appreciated how the network could establish a sophisticated chemical “fingerprint,” which would be used to track down companies who clandestinely discharge chemicals or toxic wastewater into a river or the lake.

U.S. Rep. Candice Miller, who played a pivotal role in securing the first allocation, nearly $1 million from the EPA, said the deterrent effect on polluters when the high-tech “pollution police” were put in position quickly became apparent.

“When all these water intakes were closely monitored, what was going on with our water? All of a sudden the number of chemical spills went way down. What was that, serendipity?” said Miller, a Harrison Township Republican.

The need to carefully monitor water quality is critical, as demonstrated by the tragic succession of oversights and missteps in Flint.

In Flint, local and state officials have drawn widespread criticism for failing to note (and properly treat) the highly corrosive water that flowed to residents’ homes after the decision was made to switch to the Flint River as the source for the city’s drinking water.

What’s more, unsafe levels of a chemical byproduct known as TTHM in the drinking water, which may have contributed to a 2014-15 outbreak of Legionnaire’s disease that killed nine people in Genesee County, was apparently due to improper treatment of bacteria in the raw river water.

Chuck Bellmore, director of the Mount Clemens water plant when his city was part of the Huron-to-Erie regional system, said treating raw river water can be “tricky” because it contains a large amount of sediments, and the organic materials and chloride in the water are constantly changing. In addition, many additives used to treat the raw water are acidic and can lead to overly corrosive drinking water that eats away at lead-linked pipes.

Bellmore said the high-tech monitoring system built for the Detroit area provided critical detail on water flowing in from Lake St. Clair, which guided how his plant treated the water.

“You need vigilance at all times,” said Bellmore, a 32-year veteran of the water treatment business. “Did you ever drive a car without a working speedometer? Or without a gas gauge? Every instrument is helpful.”

The network crumbles

Supporters of the Huron-to-Erie system say the network proved its worth in July 2011 when the Port Huron water filtration plant detected dramatic changes in the pH level on the upper waters of the St. Clair River ‒ caused by discharges from a nearby paper mill ‒ and the city’s water system was shut down.

Around this same time, however, two suburban county offices ‒ Macomb County Public Works and that of Oakland County Water Resources Commissioner John McCulloch ‒ opposed the network. The city of St. Clair, a key location within the monitoring network, also pulled out in 2011 following a change in city leadership. Other communities soon followed.

At that point, the network was crumbling before advocates had the opportunity to make a public pitch for the minimal surcharge.

The $3.2 million that initially financed the network came from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Homeland Security, Macomb and St. Clair counties, and several small allocations from the state Department of Environmental Quality.

But state and federal funds were temporary. There was an understanding that when the government money ran out communities would have to take over. After crunching teh numbers, advocates for the system arrived at a $1.2 million annual budget, which equated to 25 cents annually for every household and business within the network.

In the end, objections to the household expense won out over the push for continuous monitoring in the event of future contaminant spills.

“The same thing that happened in Flint could happen here, tomorrow, if one of those Canadian chemical plants had a big discharge – and we wouldn’t even know about it,” said Martz, the former Macomb water board member. “The system was just left to die.”

Five cities ‒ Marysville, Marine City, Algonac and Monroe, along with Detroit ‒ continue to offer a low-level version of monitoring, keeping tabs on the basics, such as amount of dissolved materials. The most sophisticated equipment – featuring mass spectrometers and gas chromatographs -- is gone. The data is no longer logged on a website 24/7, instead it is stored at Wayne State University. And with far fewer communities participating, there remain huge gaps in what was once an unbroken chain.

An 11th-hour attempt to save the full-fledged system occurred in 2012 when state Rep. Kurt Heise, a Plymouth Township Republican, introduced a bill designed to preserve the network, provide a governing structure for the 14-member group, and fund its ongoing operation with the 25-cents-per-year surcharge that would show up on residential and business water bills.

The legislation went nowhere.

Regrets all around

Heise, former director of the Wayne County Department of Environment, tried to convince his House colleagues that the 25 cents did not represent a new tax. He called the system an added level of security, an “insurance policy.”

DeBeaussaert, of the state’s Great Lakes office, said he believes indifference expressed by lawmakers from the western suburbs, particularly in Oakland County, reflected their inability to connect the safety of their constituents with the protection provided by equipment located dozens of miles away.

Heise, meanwhile, puts the blame squarely on Detroit, with a sprawling water system that is home to roughly 90 percent of the customers whose water was protected by the network.

In 2011-12, Heise said Detroit officials began to display a bunker mentality as the city’s financial situation was deteriorating, the Kwame Kilpatrick scandal lingered, Flint and Genesee County were threatening to withdraw from the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department, and neighboring counties began to push for placing DWSD under suburban control.

Early in 2012, Detroit officials agreed to provide a subsidy, an in-kind contribution of about $24,000 to keep the city’s monitoring equipment running at full capacity for one more year. But they would not budge in their reluctance to create a formal monitoring network funded by a water bill surcharge.

"Where the future lies ‒ ownership of the system, cost allocations, who pays for what ‒ that's still to be decided," Rodney Johnson, a DWSD spokesman, said at the time.

Looking back, Heise said he believes politics at DWSD helped doom the network’s success. “At that time, they didn’t want to support anything that looked like a fee increase or a (water) rate increase. They were the biggest opponents.”

A DWSD spokeswoman declined to comment for this article.

Given all the attention focused on drinking water quality due to the Flint debacle, Heise said recently he will consider giving his bill another try. Some officials believe the water monitoring system could be back in operation within six months if the funding issue was resolved.

Jim Ridgway, vice president of Detroit-based Environmental Consulting Technology, the firm that oversaw the building and maintenance of the network, said the brief history of the alliance shows that clean drinking water is too often taken for granted.

“It was very short sighted,” he said of the network collapse. “Communities are all under financial pressure and sometimes look at this type of monitoring as too costly to maintain. I would argue that the cost is small and the benefits are large.

Ridgway lamented that because continuous water monitoring is not “regulatorily required,” some communities felt like they could do without it.

“The public has been lulled into believing their municipal water is always safe,” he said. “That simply isn’t true. And the best protection is continuous, real-time monitoring. One need only look to Flint to see the importance of clean, safe water.”

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


David Waymire
Tue, 02/16/2016 - 9:16am
If we just cut taxes and fees, these things will take care of themselves. Sad, sad state of affairs Michigan finds itself in today.
Sabrina Gross
Tue, 02/16/2016 - 10:26am
So this is how Michigan addresses Homeland Security? And the data is stored on Wayne State University's servers? This is a real time monitoring data project - the only thing crumbling here is leadership & decision making. 25 cents per household each year is an insignificant cost for environmental protection.
John S. Porter
Tue, 02/16/2016 - 11:39am
The attitude of the public toward their leaders makes it extremely difficult to advocate for anything. There are simply more votes for being against everything. (What's wrong with that Plymouth Township Representative who knew the danger? He didn't do enough to protect the public. He probably didn't get enough campaign donations from Consulting Technology employees.) If I practice negativity enough maybe I could get a reality TV show and run for President. Seriously, this is first rate reporting and we need a lot more of it. Lets clean up the spilled milk and quit spilling more. Crying over spilled milk doesn't seem productive to me.
Jessie Dalman
Tue, 02/16/2016 - 12:08pm
There is such a mentality about "free stuff" today. Nothing is free...clean water, clean air, a clean environment and the business community isn't the only entity that has to pay for it. The Detroit water system was one of the best in the nation and tasted good as well. Something to be proud because of penny-wise, pound foolish decision makers we have this mess. Lets get over this "free stuff" attitude and pull together for the good of these well as dealing with the Sarnia communities. IF we want good water, everyone has to pay for it and have skin in the game.
Phil L.
Wed, 02/17/2016 - 10:13am
Why should residents have to pay for a water monitoring system when they don't dump or spill chemicals into the water?
Tue, 02/16/2016 - 12:45pm
Michigan shares an International Border with Canada, all along the Great Lakes. Literally millions of people, in both countries, rely on fresh water for drinking. It is imperative to monitor the condition of Natural fresh water in the lakes and rivers between USA and Canada
Tue, 02/16/2016 - 2:25pm
This article is good and supplies an overview of the current probem. It does not mention the valid reason for the distrust of Detroit by the northern counties. A closser look at this reason is needed to understand why the communities pulled out of the system when the federal funding ran out. In the past Detroit refused to share water billing information, even though communities were purchasing their water from Detroit. A FOIA request was filed and they still refused. The matter was taken to court and they were ordered to comply and they still refused. Detroit was know for it's inability to properly manage money. Communities could not go to their residents and ask them to pay millions of dollars (even at 25 cents each it's millions) to Detroit
Mark Coscarelli
Tue, 02/16/2016 - 3:31pm
Hats off to Steven Gold at the Macomb County Health Department--Steve's vision, among others, embraced the importance and need to institutionalize the monitoring network. The County engaged Public Sector Consultants (PSC) to facilitate development of a governance and funding structure among stakeholders, which came to be known as the Huron-to-Erie Alliance for Real-time Monitoring and Information, or HEART. A consensus report issued in 2009 by PSC provides a framework for network administration and funding and the numbers referenced in this article. Representative Heise's comments, sadly, accurately portray the network's undoing. But let's face it--until we as a society begin to move away from this highly subsidized commodity and internalize the true cost of clean and potable water with rate payers, HEART is simply Exhibit A.
Tue, 02/16/2016 - 4:13pm
A very timely, yet frightening, article. One can only hope that this wakes people up before another water disaster occurs in Michigan. There should be no question about the need to reestablish a comprehensive water quality monitoring network which would allow for critical and immediate response actions to protect the drinking water supply of many Michigan communities. I hope there will be continued reports about this unacceptable situation. Thank you.
Roger Rayle
Tue, 02/16/2016 - 11:00pm
Message to governor and legislature: "You're 2/3 water, act accordingly".
Wed, 02/17/2016 - 10:54am
I would be concerned that a monitoring system at the input end of the pipe does not do it's job. The same would apply to the junction where each municipality taps into the big main. There are too many water main breaks where contaminants can enter the system, and too many places where a bad back flow prevention valve could allow bad stuff into the system. Flint is just one case where the water was tested extensively and found to contain high lead levels. Every one, in every city, township, or county that is living in a house built before 1970 is susceptible to some level of lead in their water. Sure, we have to trust that people are doing their job and taking corrective action when necessary. But no system is foolproof, and some may be affected.
Wed, 02/17/2016 - 2:29pm
how did steve gold's name come into this story,he had nothing to do with raising. the funds or advocating for this system. his job was to sell this to the different communities , steve could not sell a free piece of candy or give it away, the wrong person for this job!!!!!!!!!!
Saulius Simoliunas
Sat, 02/27/2016 - 7:18pm
Why GLWA rates are going Up? Why GLWA board does not have one member knowledgeable in waterv and wastewater treatment? Why GLWA keptthe same management from DWSD? Why GLWA board should not be elected by users?
Tue, 03/29/2016 - 2:22am
I'm running for Oakland county water resources commissioner, and agree that 25¢/household is insignificant for the benefit your system could provide. It looks like great idea. I'm with you and would be happy to help convince others. Thanks, and keep posting. If you'd like to see my posts, and would like to comment (positive or negative)