GOP fix for MPSERS calls for bigger checks from teachers, retirees

The way state Rep. Rick Olson sees it, there are only three places to find a solution to financial problems in the Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System.

“Increased contribution by employees, reductions in benefits -- or find a magical money tree somewhere,” the Saline Republican said.

With no magic to call on, a group of Republican legislators came up with Senate Bill 1040, which tackles the $45 billion unfunded MPSERS liability in three major ways:

* Teachers, staff and administrators hired since 1990 would pay 8 percent of their annual salary into the retirement fund; they currently pay a range of 3 percent to 6.4 percent, depending on income.

* Current employees hired before 1990 would have the choice of paying 5 percent, up from zero contribution for pensions, or switching to a 401(k)-type program or freezing their pension at current levels.

* Current retirees would switch from a 90/10 health-care plan (i.e., paying 10 percent of its premium costs) to an 80/20 split.

All employees currently pay 3 percent for retiree health care, under a law passed in 2010, although the law is under judicial review and the money, while still being collected, is held in escrow. As of September 2011, it totaled $296.4 million, according to the MPSERS comprehensive annual financial report.

Changes also would come in retirement eligibility, requiring members to have a combined age/years of service number of 85. Members currently can retire after 30 years of service, but five of those years can be purchased. And to receive retiree health care, members would have to be at least age 60, after a phase-in period.

The bill hasn’t been warmly received by all quarters. A Senate hearing drew sharp testimony from teachers and retirees.

Gary Olson, a former head of the Senate Fiscal Agency who is preparing a paper on the financial impact of the bill, warned the panel that some changes may violate the state constitution, which guarantees pensions.

“I'm not convinced all the members of the Legislature understand the current system,” he said later. “A vast majority (of MPSERS members) are already contributing a significant amount of their salary. That’s not known by everybody.”

Olson said legislators should have the Attorney General's Office weigh in on the bill's constitutionality.

“Should reforms be looked at? Yes. The question is, what kind of reforms? It needs to follow the constitution -- and it needs to be fair,” he said.

Other critics point to the decision made by Gov. John Engler in 1991 to end the state’s contribution to the MPSERS health-care fund, which had been prefunded. Switching to a pay-as-you-go basis helped set the stage for the current shortfall, as health-care costs have exploded in recent decades.

“What hasn't happened is, the state hasn't been pre-paying into that system, the health-care side, which is the majority of that $45 billion,” said Doug Pratt, director of public affairs for the Michigan Education Association, the state’s largest teachers union.

Pratt added that the state has made the situation worse by encouraging such initiatives as charter schools, privatization and outsourcing, which reduce the number of school employees in the system.

“Let's say you have a school custodian, works 20 years, accrued benefits and was paying into them. With the push to outsource those jobs, that person's job is no longer paying in, but that accrued liability is still there. No one is paying for that,” said Pratt, who suggested requiring charter operators and others taking such contracts to pay into the MPSERS system.

The largest share of the funding burden falls upon local school districts, which pay a percentage of their payroll, an amount set in Lansing. This year, it’s 24.46 percent; next year it will rise to 27 percent and clear 31 percent the year after that. As payroll is more than 80 percent of most school districts’ spending, the dizzying rise in contributions is reducing resources for other programs.

“It’s a huge amount that will have to be paid for in laid-off staff,” said Peter Spadafore, a member of the Lansing School District board. Senate Bill 1040, while painful, is “a good start” toward addressing the problem, he said.

“Our goal is not to strip away benefits, it’s to come up with a system that is affordable and sustainable,” Spadafore said.

Rep. Olson told a group of Michigan school administrators last month that the work group wanted the districts’ contribution to be no higher than 22.5 percent of payroll, and perhaps even lower, the Kalamazoo Gazette reported. Olson, himself a former school business manager in Adrian, said the group’s goal was threefold – to reduce unfunded liability, reduce districts’ contribution rate and be fair to employees.

“But without doing something about stranded costs” -- the people drawing out of the system who are supported by fewer and fewer paying in -- we’re like a boat with a lot of water in it,” he said. “We’re bailing like crazy, but first we need to plug the hole.”

Staff Writer Nancy Nall Derringer has been a writer, editor and teacher in Metro Detroit for seven years, and was a co-founder and editor of, an early experiment in hyperlocal journalism. Before that, she worked for 20 years in Fort Wayne, Indiana, where she won numerous state and national awards for her work as a columnist for The News-Sentinel.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Tue, 04/24/2012 - 9:24am
Sorry teach, you had it too good for too long. We cannot afford this system without massive tax increases. I am willing to pay more taxes for a lot of things: better roads, cleaner environment, and for my kids education. But not for your cushy retirement plan.
Nick Fleezanis
Tue, 04/24/2012 - 12:01pm
Once again the State sees fit to renege on a promise to teachers who have given their lives to teaching the children of Michigan. Politicians make short sighted decisions that impact the lives of dedicated teachers, seniors, and other public employees to correct the misguided decisions made by other politicians like Governor Engler and Grandholm. It time for these elected officials to stand behind the promises made to these dedicated public servants and find other ways to make up for the shortfalls created by poor decision making in Lansing. And the people of Michigan need to understand the need to support their educators in order to have an educated and well trained citizenry.
David Waymire
Tue, 04/24/2012 - 6:17pm
Robert, all we need to do is go back to the tax system we had in 2000, when unemployment was 4 percent. At that time, you paid 9.49 percent of income to state taxes. Now we are at 6.75 percent or less. We are billions of dollars under the Headlee limit. We can afford this. We simply choose not to. And I guarantee, our grandchildren will live to regret it. If you think we have trouble getting qualified people to become teachers today, wait until tomorrow.