Is Michigan now officially a red state?

In the end, the horse race was not a photo finish, but more like Gov. Rick Snyder (and his fellow Republicans) by three lengths. The collapse of Mark Schauer’s campaign, said to be in a virtual dead heat with the incumbent in its final days, left not only a chastened Democratic Party but the continued drift rightward for Michigan that might not have been imaginable a generation ago.

Both U.S. Senators will be Democrats, due to the easy victory of Gary Peters over Republican Terri Lynn Land. But after Tuesday’s election, Lansing will be redder than ever, “the most conservative legislature we’ve seen since the 1950s,” in the observation of Mark Brewer, the former chairman of the state’s Democratic Party.

In Wednesday’s aftermath, political observers were left to debate whether increased GOP majorities in the House and Senate will push the state further right, potentially disrupting the agenda of a governor who ran first as a moderate and then as a moderate with a solid record of accomplishments to please both parties – Medicaid expansion and a rejuvenated Detroit for Democrats, a substantial business tax cut and right-to-work legislation for Republicans.

But with Snyder now term-limited, and an even larger Republican majority set to arrive in 2015, including more tea party adherents, the question of whose agenda takes priority may not be entirely settled. Some Republicans, like veteran GOP insider and former Senate Majority Leader Ken Sikkema, say this new era could be one of mainstream Republican achievement rather than extremism.

“Now with 63 Republican seats (in the House), the handful of tea party types are marginalized,” said Sikkema, a senior policy fellow at Public Sector Consultants in Lansing, who has done work for The Center for Michigan, Bridge’s publisher.

“Republican control is so big, you can give seven votes away and still pass a bill. You don't have to kowtow to an extreme conservative agenda if you don't want to if you are in House leadership.”

Sikkema hesitated to predict what major legislation might get done in the next two or four years. But he said he believes the gubernatorial results suggest that voters respect a party and governor that get things done, noting Snyder's $1.6 billion business tax cut and controversial tax on pensions.

“You can pursue a very robust, controversial agenda and actually be rewarded for doing it. I think voters thought, 'I don't agree with everything they did but at least they did something.’”

Others were not so sanguine. Kelly Rossman-McKinney, CEO and principal of Truscott-Rossman, a Lansing-based public relations firm, said she anticipated the legislature clashing with Snyder.

“The Senate will be more conservative, but I don’t know how knee-jerk they’ll be with a more comfortable majority,” she said. “I doubt the relationship with the governor will be as compatible as it has been, and it wasn’t very compatible before.”

Rossman-McKinney’s partner, John Truscott, a former press secretary to GOP Gov. John Engler, disagreed, saying he doesn't expect a hard turn to the right by the Legislature.

“I think Republicans have to be careful not to anger the electorate,” Truscott said. “These things can bounce back quickly. You have to be responsible.

“If you are a tea party legislator, do you want to have an impact or not? If you want to have an impact, you have to play ball. You have to be cooperative to get things done.”

Counters Rossman-McKinney, who said she worries in particular about issues like same-sex marriage, “It’s a real possibility for Michigan to go backwards on those basic human rights issues. I would not put anything past freshman legislators. They’re full of testosterone, and full of the, ‘All right, here I come, I have my agenda and I’m going to push it.’ Whether reality sets in will be really interesting.”

First, fix the roads

Political observers roundly expect that funds for road repair, if it gets done, will only happen in the upcoming lame-duck session, due to the unwillingness of some in the 2015 Legislature to vote for new taxes, for anything. Beyond that, speculation is wide open on how aggressive House and Senate Republican leaders will be on taxes, education and social issues important to their conservative base in the months and years ahead.

Brewer, the former Democratic chair, said he expects “attacks on public education” via more charter schools and “a refusal to adequately invest in education and infrastructure. Minnesota is doing much better than we are on these issues, but the ideologues in the GOP have no interest in that.”

Ken Cole, a lobbyist for the city of Detroit who also sits on the Bridge board of advisers, said he hopes the legislature will continue to support Michigan’s largest city as it recovers from bankruptcy. However, he said, Detroit residents still harbor mixed feelings over what many see as Lansing’s role in the city’s financial troubles.

The legislature’s help for the city, Cole added, seems predicated on the narrative – erroneous, in his view – that Detroit’s troubles are “all come from greedy public sector unions and inept, corrupt politicians, especially black ones,” rather than from a slackening in state revenue sharing over the years.

But in the end, those Detroiters, and other residents of Michigan’s beleaguered cities, were lackluster in their support for alternative state leadership.

Schauer needed better turnout than in 2010 in Democratic strongholds to have a chance. He didn't get it, as Snyder won 51 percent to 47 percent. Statewide turnout was just over 42 percent, down from 45 percent in 2010.

For those expecting a Detroit backlash against Snyder because of that city's bankruptcy, it didn't happen. About 10,000 fewer Detroit voters showed up than in 2010. Schauer won the city 92 percent to 7 percent, a similar margin to Bernero's 94 percent to 5 percent tally four years ago.

As for Democrats who ran and lost, Sikkema said he believes they need to retool if they are to reverse several election cycles of GOP dominance in state races.

“They spent a lot of effort attacking Republicans, as to what they see as their political vulnerabilities rather than telling people what they want to accomplish,” Sikkema said. “They have to take stock of who they are, rethink their messaging.

“What they are doing now isn't working. In the state Senate, there is no way Republicans ought to have 27 seats in a 38-member body in a state like Michigan.”

Michigan Education Association spokesman Doug Pratt said he was unsure where the Democratic Party goes from here.

“We have to look at the numbers and see what happened. To have an election where 100,000 fewer people turned out is not something that anybody was expecting. To have 100,000-plus fewer people vote yesterday is incredibly stunning.”

As to what the results mean for the state's political agenda, he said: “Honestly, I don't know. It's too early to give you something on that.”

Dems need a reboot

Cole, the Detroit lobbyist, echoed Sikkema’s critique of the Dems. Aside from Jennifer Granholm, no Democrat has won state-level political office – governor, attorney general or secretary of state – in two decades.

“The Democrats deserve some of this. What do they stand for? They need to decide,” Cole said.

In 2012, Democrats whiffed on two ballot measures to prop up union clout, traditionally their biggest source of support. The big one – Proposal 2 – would have enshrined collective bargaining in the state Constitution. It lost 58 percent to 42 percent. A second proposal to classify home health care workers as public employees lost badly as well. (Democrats lost pro-labor ballot issues in 2002 and 2006 as well.)

A few weeks after state voters rejected Prop 2, Snyder signed right to work legislation, which prohibits compulsory collection of union dues.

By 2013, all this caught up with Brewer, the former party chairman. After 18 years at the helm, Brewer was ousted at the party convention by Lon Johnson.

Johnson is credited for modernizing the party's organizing structure and seeking to push up absentee votes through a mobile phone app.

But the party still faces the same upstream swim as Brewer – an ongoing drop in labor clout, long the heartbeat of Democratic organizing and fundraising. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, union membership fell from 26 percent of Michigan workers in 1989 to just over 16 percent in 2013.

Some voters seemed to be stepping out of party boundaries, even as the state becomes redder.

Kentwood resident Laurie Fernandez voted for Snyder four years ago, hoping he could help get Michigan back on its feet. This time she voted for Schauer – for one dominant reason.

“I didn't like what Snyder did for the schools and for teachers. He did cut money from schools – I know, it happened to me,” Fernandez said.

Fernandez said she was pink-slipped as a teacher in the East Grand Rapids Public Schools, for which she blames Snyder.

Bryon Quertermous, a 38-year-old web administrator from Canton who was once a solid Republican, said he now considers himself independent.

Quertermous said he split his ticket on Tuesday for the top four state positions evenly, voting for Snyder and Republican Secretary of State Ruth Johnson, but also for Democrats Gary Peters and Mark Totten for U.S. Senate and attorney general, respectively.

“Snyder seems to have a pragmatic view, which I like,” he said. “He seems to want to stay out of the social-issue quagmire. Considering how antagonistic his party has been, I didn’t think he’d get as much accomplished as he has.”



Slow, steady march of decline

Tuesday’s gubernatorial election was the closest in Michigan since Jennifer Granholm first won in 2002. But, no matter how you add it up, the Democrats are on a Chicago Cubs-styled losing streak at the state level – in the contests for the big-three statewide offices: governor, attorney general, and secretary of state. The GOP is 6-0 in those races in the past two election cycles. The GOP is 10-2 in those races since 2002. The GOP is 15-6 in those races since 1990. Jennifer Granholm is the only Democrat for any of those top-three state posts to win election in the past 20 years.


1990John Engler(R)Frank Kelley(D)Richard Austin(D)1249.8% 
1994John Engler(R)Frank Kelley(D)Candice Miller(R)2161.5% 
1998John Engler(R)Jennifer Granholm(D)Candice Miller(R)2162.2% 
2002Jennifer Granholm(D)Mike Cox(R)Terri Lynn Land(R)2151.4%Collective bargaining constitutional guarantee
2006Jennifer Granholm(D)Mike Cox(R)Terri Lynn Land(R)2156.3%Education spending constitutional guarantee
2010Rick Snyder(R)Bill Schuette(R)Ruth Johnson(R)3058.1% 
2012      Proposal 2 & Proposal 4
2014Rick Snyder(R)Bill Schuette(R)Ruth Johnson(R)3051.0% 
TOTALGOP 5-2GOP 4-3GOP 6-1156  


Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Thu, 11/06/2014 - 10:31am
It is not a red state! It's all about turnout. Michigan will continue to go blue in the presidential elections which is why some Republicans are proposing crazy electoral plans. Going from almost 60% (presidential) to 42% (midterm) turnout does not mean that the state has gone red. It's clear the Dems cannot get their base out during the midterms and Republicans are walking in a field full of land mines if they go ahead thinking they have a super-mandate.
Thu, 11/06/2014 - 9:46pm
Look at the map. It's red.
Fri, 11/07/2014 - 6:33pm
Obviously not a math major John. When MI goes blue in 2016 you might be still trying to figure out why ("but the map is red!"). Snyder beat a guy that hardly anyone knew by 4% because the Dems didn't show up (and haven't the last 20+ years except in 2006 because of the Iraq War). Might want to look at the counties again...
Thu, 11/06/2014 - 11:04am
I think the map speaks volumes. Detroit, Flint and to a lesser extent Saginaw and Bay City will continue to support Democrats, regardless of the quality of the candidate. In this election, Democrats voted...some of them by not voting at all. So the question for Republicans is how do they present candidates that appeal to the rest of the state? Terry Lynn Land will be an example the Republicans need to remember for future elections. Quality candidates and campaigns will win, anything else will lose.
Thu, 11/06/2014 - 12:01pm
It's more than turnout, and it is definitely not because Michigan is turning 'red'. It is more about campaign resources (a.k.a. dark money) which gave a huge advantage to the GOP under-ticket and, more importantly, it is about gerrymandering. Michigan Democrats received more votes than Republicans for both the state House and U.S. House, but Republicans won 63-47 and 9-5 majorities. In the state Senate, Republicans had a 1.4% vote advantage but gained a 27-11 margin. The details of the GOP's very effective "stack and pack" gerrymandering are at Democrats also swept 7 of the 8 education posts which is considered a good barometer of party strength. The only Republican to win, MSU Trustee Melanie Foster, probably won because a popular Lansing-area progressive ran in the Green Party. He received a vote total that was double the size of Foster's margin over third-place finisher (Democrat) Faylene Owen.
Thu, 11/06/2014 - 9:48pm
The map is red. Denial is yellow.
Thu, 11/06/2014 - 7:42pm
Dem Bums (not a typo) need to stop running away from black people, Latinos, civil rights, the poor and progressive topics in general. This always happens, in the pursuit of getting the almighty "swing voter independent"= white, over 30, already skeptical toward ethnic minorities and gays, uncritically pro-gun in every way, hard-right on anything "crime" related, even when it involves nonviolent offenses, hard-right on everything birth-control, uncritically pro-police, uncritically for as much military spending as possible, uncritical regarding corporate profiteerism, uncritical regarding tax evasion by corporations, and hostile toward anything that's perceived as "taking" from them (e.g., national health care). Heavy slashing of "entitlement" policy is always vaunted as this big deal of pragmatic magnanimity for every Democratic candidate that wants to get into office. Expansion of care for the vulnerable is almost NEVER on the table. That's it. I don't care anymore. The Republican party hates me, and the mainstream wing of Democratic party really don't care about me. They'll always pick the white swing voter over me every time. EVERY. SINGLE. TIME. Urban, minority issues don't matter at all in comparison.
Bruce McFee
Thu, 11/06/2014 - 8:03pm
Phil, you are well aware of the coattails in university board elections. Between Wayne State, Michigan State and U of M, there were five dems elected vs one repub. That's evidence the state is still Blue.
Fri, 11/07/2014 - 8:58am every county except 3 in the UP, the percentage of Dem votes went up and the percentage of Reps went down - demonstrably so. Perhaps an undercurrent is developing?
Jack Lessenberry
Fri, 11/07/2014 - 9:25am
This is overall a good story with one flaw that it parrots from the mainstream media: The so-called "collapse" and supposedly dreadful performance of the Schauer campaign. Snyder had the smallest margin of any governor since 1990. He is also the only governor since 1962 to do less well the second time he ran than the first. Getting 51 percent in a lousy turnout when it rained all day in the Dems biggest stronghold isn't exactly an Engler-sized mandate. Yes, there were lots of problems with the Dems campaign. But this was a huge Republican year, and Snyder's performance looks pretty anemic compared with most other states. Had this been a normal year and a normal turnout, he would have lost
Sun, 11/09/2014 - 8:05pm
Thanks, Jack. To what extent do you think all the negativity, on both sides, everywhere, contributes to general low voter turnout? During my canvassing, even with a highly selected list of doors to knock, I occasionally got a response in the vein of "they're all terrible, the system is rigged, I can't vote for any of them." I hope you'll address this in a future commentary.
David Allen
Fri, 11/07/2014 - 9:31am
This is not about turnout or money. It is about gerrymandering. Michigan often has more blue votes cast, yet the state turns ever more red. The people of Michigan cannot be fairly represented until a constitutional amendment is passed to have the state redistricted by a non-partisan NEUTRAL committee. Since the legislature has no interest in losing power that it one through chicanery, this will have to be done by a citizen initiated ballot.
Fri, 11/07/2014 - 9:39am
Much depends on what is meant by "red." If it means merely Republican control, that appears to be structural in nature, a combination of turnout and district. If it is meant something like an ideological agenda, that is more difficult to see. There is a persistent theme of localism in politics (well, at least out here on the west side). While Kent is solidly red, Grand Rapids is not -- the win be Rep. Brinks in the face of a large Snyder win in the 76th, speaks about the triumph of the local over the partisan. That's even true in that reddest of counties, Ottawa, they passed a tax increase for roads. Robust local initiatives and focus will continue to temper any red-tinged partisanship.
John Q. Public
Sat, 11/08/2014 - 11:40am
I don't dismiss the idea that the state may well be getting 'redder' because there are many like several of my more educated acquaintances--soon to be joined by my entire nuclear family--who have left the state, adopting a philosophy of "If that's how you want to live, have at it, but it's definitely not for us."
Tue, 11/11/2014 - 10:07am
The majority of voters in Michigan may vote for a Democrat for president in 2016 but the Michigan Electoral College vote will be Red Red Red. By December 31, 2014, the legislature will vote to change the Electoral College to a system where electors will vote by district thus assuring gerrymandering works in their favor. Governor Snyder will hem and haw claiming this was not part of his agenda, and then sign the legislation. This was not an issue during the midterms but should have been on everyone's horizon. I find it amusing and terrifying that Republicans are so afraid that one voter might commit voter fraud that they entertained over a hundred bills to prevent it in the last year, but they are convinced it is proper to steal an entire election.
Wed, 12/03/2014 - 12:03pm
its red, and it will stay red until there is campaign finance reform. Republicans can raise more money, and money wins 90% of the time. Dark money is an even bigger problem.