Michigan voters may weigh legalizing pot, repealing prevailing wage

Michigan Solutions Summit panel on 2018 ballot issues: marijuana and prevailing wage

Bridge Reporter Lindsay VanHulle moderates a panel on 2018 ballot initiatves regarding the pros and cons of prevailing wage and the legalize recreational marijuana at our Michigan Solutions Summit on Good Government on March 14, 2018.

Michigan voters may have the chance to determine big changes to some state policies come November, when signature-tested ballot initiatives may well appear in the midterm elections.

Two proposals — to legalize recreational marijuana, and to repeal the state’s prevailing wage law — are waiting for signature review by the state Bureau of Elections. Representatives for and against each proposal convened in East Lansing on Wednesday at the Center for Michigan’s Solutions Summit to talk about the issues.

Related: Michigan prevailing wage law repeal petition will undergo second signature review
Related: Which 2018 Michigan ballot issues are going strong. Or going down

Josh Hovey represented the Coalition to Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol, which would make marijuana legal for recreational use with many similar guidelines currently applied to alcohol in Michigan. Healthy and Productive Michigan is a group organizing to oppose the proposal, represented by Matthew Yascolt.

Marijuana legalization would bring tax revenue exceeding $200 million to the state and job opportunities within an above-board industry, Hovey said. He added that support for recreational marijuana legalization is high, and national trends indicate legalization is inevitable.

“Sweeping it under the rug and driving a black market isn’t the way to go,” he said. “Let’s shed some light on the issue and deal with it like adults.”

Yascolt countered that health risks are associated with marijuana, which he said is a “gateway” to harder drug use. It’s an addictive substance that will be marketed similarly to tobacco, and ultimately the proposal is about industrializing marijuana. He said, “this is about rich people getting richer.”

Related: 2018 Michigan Solution Summits ‒ Reserve your seat today!
Related: Be a part of the 2018 Michigan Truth Tour​

The state’s prevailing wage law has essentially required union scale wages and benefits on state building projects for more than 50 years. Jeff Wiggins spoke on behalf of Protecting Michigan Taxpayers, whose ballot initiative would repeal the law. Opposing him Wednesday was Pat Devlin, CEO of Michigan Building and Construction Trades Council.

Wiggins argued that prevailing wage increases the cost of construction for taxpayers and is a burden on small and medium-sized contract businesses who want to bid on government projects. He said regulatory requirements associated with prevailing wage can be a burden for companies that don’t have significant resources to navigate them.

“This is the complete antithesis of what American entrepreneurship, the free market and open competition is about,” he said.

Devlin said the proposal is “nothing short of backroom politics,” and would bring no savings to taxpayers because contractors would keep any money saved for themselves, with workers getting lower wages. Repealing the law would also limit skilled trades training, which is generally funded by union contractors.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.