New rankings find fiscal troubles for city halls across Michigan

While the financial problems of Detroit have captured the headlines this spring, a new analysis released today on government finance finds that dozens of Michigan communities may be on a course for crisis.

According to Munetrix, a Web-based data consultant in Auburn Hills, dozens of local units of government were in a financial state that is “cause for concern” in their 2011 fiscal years. Computations were drawn from data submitted by local units of government to the state Department of Treasury.

Munetrix’s analysis is a modified version of one formerly used by the Treasury Department in which scores of 5 to 7 placed communities on a “fiscal watch list.” A score of 8 to 10 is considered evidence of  “poor financial condition” -- requiring immediate corrective action.

(Complete financial information for 2012 is not expected to be available through the Department of Treasury until July. Munetrix plans to post 2012 data at that time.)

SE Michigan has troubles, but isn’t alone

Some findings come as no surprise and reflect the widely reported financial issues in Southeast Michigan.

Wayne County rated an 8, on a 1 0 to 10 scale in which 10 is close to financial catastrophe. And eight of 23 municipalities rated 6 or worse were in Wayne County. Nearby Flint rated a 7, as did Detroit – which was just described as “insolvent” and in “dire financial straits” in a preliminary assessment by emergency manager Kevyn Orr.

But the Munetrix breakdown also detected trouble in places such as Bangor, a Van Buren County city of 1,885, which earned a 5; the Village of Middleville south of Grand Rapids, a 5, the Northern Michigan city of Gaylord, a 4. The state capital of Lansing rated a 6.

Kathy Roy, a consultant for Munetrix, said the data confirm that fiscal stress is by no means confined to the usual southeast Michigan suspects. She is the former finance director and controller for Novi.

“The problem is bigger than that,” Roy said. “Southeast Michigan was hit harder but the reality is that many communities have seen a decline in their tax base.”

It is worth noting that most municipalities fared reasonably well on this scale. Of more than 1,000 units of government evaluated for 2011, about 85 percent had scores of  2 or 1. Kent County's Wyoming, Walker and Grand Rapids each scored a 1, as did Muskegon. Ann Arbor scored a 2; Kalamazoo posted a 3.

Cities also could take encouragement from jobs trend, with the unemployment rate dropping from 10.3 percent in March 2011 to 8.5 percent in March 2013. And according to the Michigan Association of Realtors, home sales in 2012 reached the highest level since 2005. Prices in the Detroit metropolitan area climbed by 15 percent in the year through February, according to the Case-Shiller home price index. As property values rise, so should tax revenues.

But some communities continue to be pressed by ongoing budget woes, as they resort to everything from slashing police and fire staffing to fee increases.

Capital city struggles with deficit

In Lansing, city officials are exploring a plan to charge residents an average of $46 a year for fire hydrants and streetlights to close a $5 million deficit.

The proposal prompted a Lansing senior citizen named S. Henderson to ask via the local paper, “Why does the city of Lansing always put it on the backs of people in Lansing when they need money?”

He added: “It is time for me to make a decision about living elsewhere.”

In the meantime, Kalamazoo looks to cut 90 employees with an early retirement plan as it trims its work force to less than 700 from a peak of more than 900 in 2001. Saginaw officials are contemplating deeps cuts in police and fire department staff. Statewide, local government employment was cut by 53,600 jobs from a 2006 peak of 438,500, according to the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics.

The Munetrix data reflect a series of blows to local government in the past decade: plummeting property values, rising home foreclosures, deep cuts in state revenue sharing, the limitations of the tax-shift measure known as Proposal A and escalating costs of pension and health-care benefits.

Former Lansing mayor David Hollister foresees even more peril ahead without reform to how cities are funded. Absent that change, he said, many cities – not just Detroit or Flint -- could face fiscal insolvency in “five to seven years.”

“The cities are in a very precarious situation,” he said.

In Hollister's view, the biggest threat is the growing weight of pension and retirement health care benefits, a burden he believes could overwhelm the ability of some cities to meet.

A Michigan State University study released earlier this year found that 311 units of government in Michigan had unfunded liability totaling $12.7 billion for retiree health care in 2011. According to the study, Detroit had unfunded liabilities of nearly $5 billion. It reported that 86 percent of  unfunded liability was concentrated in Southeast Michigan, including Genesee, Lapeer, Lenawee, Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, Oakland, St. Clair, Washtenaw and Wayne counties.

Beyond that, cities have been battered by years of diminished property value and shrinking tax revenues. In the four years from 2007 to 2011, Michigan home- and business owners lost $180 billion from the value of their properties. That amounted to a drop of 27 percent when adjusted for inflation.

The fall in value was accelerated by foreclosure filings that consistently placed Michigan among the top 10 in the nation in foreclosure rate. According to RealtyTrac, about 100,000 foreclosure filings were reported in 2011. That was the sixth-highest foreclosure rate in the nation. In 2012, it ranked eighth highest.

State government slashed funds it sent to local government as it labored to balance its books in a decade of economic decline. According to a report issued in April by accounting firm Plante Moran, cuts in statutory revenue sharing to local units have exceeded $6 billion since 2001.

And even when the news is good, clouds gather over city halls. While property values appear headed up, cities are limited in how quickly they can capture that growth. Under Proposal A, approved by voters in 1994, taxable value can only rise by 5 percent or the rate of inflation, whichever is less. In other words, the huge value drops of the last decade only can be made up in small amounts over a long period of time.

Future filled with tough calls

In Ecorse, a Wayne County city of just under 10,000, Munetrix sees a “7” crisis – grim news, though an upgrade from the 8 it earned in the three previous years.

Those years were spent under the control of a state-appointed emergency manager. Under Joyce Parker, Ecorse merged its police and fire departments, privatized EMS service and secured $9.5 million in bonds to pay down its debt.

Now, though, Ecorse is transitioning back to local control by elected officials.

To the north, Saginaw improved to a 2, from a 6 in 2010 and 3 in 2009. Munetrix’s Buzz Brown noted that Saginaw’s budget outlook was bolstered by a significant increase in community development grants and the transfer of $2.2 million from a budget stabilization fund into its general fund.

But it is far from out of the woods.

Facing a $3 million deficit, City Manager Darnell Earley is recommending a budget that would cut its public safety staffing nearly in half, to 55 police officers and 35 firefighters. The Police Department had about 100 officers in 2010 and the Fire Department 67 firefighters in 2011.

“Obviously it's nothing anybody wants to see happen,” Earley said. “But as our revenues have declined, our ability to provide services as a status quo level has declined.”

With public service accounting for two-thirds of Saginaw's general fund budget, Earley sees no other options.

He noted that voters have already twice voted for a special millage to support police and fire. He said he would not ask them for more “until we find a way to reduce the cost of delivering the services.”

Without those cuts, Earley asserts, Saginaw “would be headed down the same road” as cities under emergency financial management.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Thu, 05/16/2013 - 9:23am
So the birds come home to roost. All the years of overly generous pension benefits, beyond belief buyouts, ever rising property values, extra millages snuck through when nobody seemed to care to vote, and expenditure on questionable ventures have finally caused the golden goose to be not so golden. Maybe it's time to say "we just aren't going to do this anymore", or if we are, then have a realistic accounting of just what it will cost. Maybe it's time to say "do we need all these different governments" and do things like mergers or privatization. I for one do not have endlessly deep pockets to support all the whims that someone on a local government body can think up. I want police and fire protection, water and sewer, and acceptable local roads but beyond that not much else from my local government.
Thu, 05/16/2013 - 11:37am
It is interesting that a city like Muskegon can be so well rated and a city like Saginaw not so well rates gets so much more coverage from Mr. Roelofs. It seems Mr. Roelofs is more enamored by failure than success. He would rather hear and share the whining of Lansing the listening to and sharing how fiscal success us achieved. We hear about bias, is this article another example of media bias. Promote fail and those that keep wanting to spend more and more of other peoples money and nothing about success and those that are much more conscensious in seeing that their communities get better value for their money. I wonder why we hear so little if anything from Mr. Roelofs about those well rated communities. I guess Mr. Roelofs or others at Bridge have never heard that it is better to understand success and leverage it than it is to whine about failure. It would be interesting to see a comparison of how and why successful (rate 1 or 2) communities and failured (8,9,or 10) communities got where they are.
Charles Richards
Sun, 05/19/2013 - 2:54pm
It would have been extremely helpful to have had a histogram showing how many entities received each score from zero to ten. It is implied that their is a need for relief in the form of increased revenue sharing from the state. But the article states that 85% of communities received a score of one or two. Given that revenue sharing was cut proportionally for each municipality, there must be another reason why some communities are in trouble. If you increased revenue sharing just for troubled communities, aren't you running a risk of subsidizing poor policies? Mr. Hollister says, " the biggest threat is the growing weight of pension and retirement health care benefits, a burden he believes could overwhelm the ability of some cities to meet." Why did these cities agree to pension plans they couldn't afford? And given the existence of Medicare, why were they offering medical benefits to retirees?
Charles Richards
Sun, 05/19/2013 - 3:32pm
Mr. Roelofs says, "Statewide, local government employment was cut by 53,600 jobs from a 2006 peak of 438,500, according to the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics." That is a decline of 12.2%; that does not seem draconian. It would have been helpful, if the information was available, to know how those reductions were distributed among all the communities. Have good fiscal scores been maintained by significantly degrading the quality of life? Mr. Roelofs is mistaken when, after discussing the limitations of Proposal A, he says, "In other words, the huge value drops of the last decade only can be made up in small amounts over a long period of time." In fact, they cannot be made up at all in real terms, after inflation. As difficult as it may be politically, perhaps we need to ask the voters to appropriately modify Proposal A.