Truth Squad calls foul on pro-Proposal 2 'lying' claim

MICHIGAN TRUTH SQUAD ANALYSIS: “Mask” “Enforcement” and “Collective Bargaining Protects Jobs”

Who: Protect Working Families, Pro-Proposal 2 ballot group

What: TV/Internet ads

Truth Squad call: Foul

Proposal 2 would “grant public and private employees the constitutional right to organize and bargain collectively through labor unions.”

According to a report by the independent, nonpartisan Citizens Research Council of Michigan, Proposal 2 is an effort to combat recent actions taken by the governor and Legislature to restrict the bargaining power and costs of public sector workers. Those recent actions include restriction of teacher tenure, requiring public employees to pay more for health-care premiums and prohibit minimum staffing levels for police and firefighters. Further, Proposal 2, would, according to the Citizens Research Council, “effectively restrict the ability of the Michigan Legislature to enact right to work legislation.”

Protecting Working Families, formerly Protect Our Jobs, is the ballot committee in favor of Proposal 2. It is primarily funded by labor interests and had raised $8 million by the end of July. Ballot committees will report their finances again at the end of October.

Questionable statement: “Having the most modern, dependable equipment? When the clock is ticking, that counts. That’s why I support collective bargaining. It means we negotiate for gear we need, to protect your lives and ours. If it comes from collective bargaining, the politicians can’t cut it without our say-so.” (Mask)

A firefighter in full gear – identified as Mike Hendricks of Lincoln Park – breathes through the mask of an air pack as he delivers his lines, saying the pack “gives me 30 minutes to look inside your burning house and find you.” Workers negotiate for their equipment, he says, implying that without collective bargaining, firefighters might find themselves under-equipped to do their jobs.

Michigan State Fire Marshal Richard Miller said equipment is “sometimes” a topic for labor negotiations, although by no means all the time; many departments are staffed by volunteers and consequently have no labor agreements, yet are still adequately equipped.

Miller said most departments follow standards set by the National Fire Protection Association, a 116-year-old nonprofit whose mission is to “reduce the worldwide burden of fire and other hazards on the quality of life by providing and advocating consensus codes and standards, research, training and education.” Miller refused to comment on the connection between labor agreements and the efficacy of firefighting.

Questionable statement: “The No on 2 campaign is lying about collective bargaining. The Truth Squad called the claims ‘questionable’ and a ‘foul.’ Yes on 2 doesn’t change any laws that protect our kids. It’s the opposite. Yes on 2 protects kids in schools and on our streets, by allowing those who care for them to negotiate for training and tools they need to keep kids safe.” (Enforcement)

This ad seeks to rebut claims by the various groups opposed to Proposal 2, which have run several ads claiming the law could be dangerous to children.

The No on 2 campaign’s claims rest on a letter by Attorney General Bill Schuette, cited repeatedly by Prop 2 opponents, that lays out a long list of Michigan laws he believes could be nullified or compromised should the proposal pass. Previous Truth Squad analyses have found those claims to range from foul (that passage could lead to sexual predators in classrooms) to no foul (on claims about school safety and the potential for teacher strikes), noting that they rest on shaky semantic ground between “would” and “could.”

Given the uncertainty about the effects of Proposal 2, making such a distinction is crafty, but defensible, the Truth Squad ruled: “Since there is not clear legal agreement on what Prop 2 will or won’t do, the use of the word "could" do something is tough, but in-bounds.

But this ad pivots on a bold counter-claim: “It’s the opposite.” Without collective bargaining, the ad implies, public-safety officers wouldn’t be able to negotiate for “training and tools they need to keep kids safe.”

As in the case of the firefighters, collective bargaining can cover many work-related matters, including training and tools. Whether it’s only those training and tools that “keep kids safe” is a matter of interpretation.

The final spot, “Protect Jobs,” displays a number of statistics, all taken from a report by the Economic Policy Institute, which describes itself as “a non-profit, non-partisan think tank, created in 1986 to broaden discussions about economic policy to include the needs of low- and middle-income workers. EPI believes every working person deserves a good job with fair pay, affordable health care, and retirement security.”  The EPI just published the 12th edition of its comprehensive report, “State of Working America.”

The data offered by the video points out the lost ground by the working class in Michigan, which in general is more productive, but earning less than it was 20 or 30 years ago. The report is a policy brief in support of collective bargaining.

Overall impression: The ads attempt to link collective bargaining rights to public safety and to economic improvement – two themes that always attract the attention of the voter.

Foul or no foul: Foul. The “Enforcement” ad says Prop 2 opponents are “lying.” It fails to detail that case, but rather offers a bland description of training and equipment equaling protection. The “Mask” ad pushes it right to the edge by giving viewers the impression that public safety officers would be poorly equipped were it not for collective bargaining, but the implication doesn’t reach the level of a foul.

The Center for Michigan (the parent company of Bridge Magazine and the Michigan Truth Squad) has been financially supported by a wide range of corporate and foundation supporters. We are grateful to all funders for helping us create and grow a new nonprofit journalism service for Michigan citizens. Those funders have absolutely no role in the editorial decisions of the Michigan Truth Squad or Bridge Magazine.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Alex Franklin
Mon, 10/22/2012 - 11:06am
Let's focus on the facts: FACT: No other state has a constitutional amendment like this. FACT: Between 100 and 170 laws will be invalidated because of the passage of 2. FACT: The Holland Sentinel, the Detroit Free Press, the Detroit News, the Battle Creek Enquirer, the Livingston Daily, the Lansing State Journal, the Michigan Sheriff's Association, the Michigan Association of School Administrators, and the Michigan Association of School Boards have come out against Prop 2. Join us against Proposal 2 in Michigan. Like us at No corporate funding, no attack ads, just concerned citizens that think this is a very bad amendment.
Jim Zielske
Wed, 10/24/2012 - 9:36am
Proponets seem to have a history of distorting and misleading the voters. On Mlive John Armegalos Spokesperson for " Protect OUR Jobs, Increase Taxes" stated as the live chat concluded...A yes vote is for " Collective bargaining" a No vote eliminates it. Factually not true. He also said that the Bay City contract was * expired* but after Dave Murry "Fact checked" that statement, Dave found the contract in question, the leter of understanding was signed Jan.2012 and in effect untill Jan.2017. The best way for parents to " Fact Check" is to contact your local schools Superintendent or Board of Education memebers, for honest answers to the devastating effects this will have on our schools. Call them TODAY!!!!
Mon, 10/29/2012 - 12:52pm
Will propoal 2 eliminate the continued heath care for the legislature contuned care for life.