Skip to main content
Michigan’s nonpartisan, nonprofit news source

Informing you and your community in 2025

Bridge Michigan’s year-end fundraising campaign is happening now! As we barrel toward 2025, we are crafting our strategy to watchdog Michigan’s newly elected officials, launch regional newsletters to better serve West and North Michigan, explore Michigan’s great outdoors with our new Outdoor Life reporter, innovate our news delivery and engagement opportunities, and much more!

Will you help us prepare for the new year? Your tax-deductible support makes our work possible!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate

Whitmer: Replace Michigan’s unemployment system. Critics: What took so long?

unemployment form
Gov. Gretchen Whitmer is seeking 75 million to upgrade the Michigan Integrated Data Automated System. (Shutterstock)

LANSING — The faulty computer system that Michigan uses to pay benefits to unemployed residents could get replaced, according to Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s latest budget proposal.

On Tuesday, Budget Director Christopher Harkins outlined Michigan’s $74 billion budget, which includes $88 million in spending to address issues with the state’s unemployment insurance system.

Sponsor

According to a news release issued by Whitmer’s office, that money would “strengthen Michigan’s Unemployment Insurance System.”

Related:

Whitmer, a Democrat running for reelection, wants $75 million to upgrade the Michigan Integrated Data Automated System, or MiDAS, a computer system used to collect unemployment taxes from employers and pay unemployment insurance benefits to those who have lost their jobs.

But the controversial system also uses an algorithm to either delay, or invalidate claims, as well as flag fraud. The state has acknowledged the system flagged as many as 40,000 residents were falsely accused of unemployment fraud from 2013 to 2015, prompting several lawsuits.

According to previous reporting from Bridge Michigan, the algorithm could falsely adjudicate fraud if a group of applicants have similar birthdays, or for choosing from a multiple choice menu the “I need the money” option when asking for unemployment benefits. 

Tony Paris, the lead attorney at the Detroit-based Maurice and Jane Sugar Law Center for Economic and Social Justice who have represented those falsely accused of fraud, called the MiDAS system a “nightmare” and a “colossal failure.”

“This experiment with automated decisions of a public benefit has failed,” Paris said. “Government and public benefits and rights cannot be ‘automated’ with an algorithm.”

He said the system has had problems for decades, and that the only way to improve it is with a total overhaul.

The state’s Unemployment Insurance Agency has been an embattled agency for years, but the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated long standing problems.

According to an audit by the Michigan Auditor General, the state paid $38.9 billion in unemployment insurance from 5.4 million claims from March 2020 through September 2021.

A separate report by the accounting firm Deloitte and Touche found that “in total, for claims filed for the duration of March 1, 2020, to September 30, 2021, the State avoided an estimated $43.7 billion in fraud while paying an estimated $8.4-$8.5 billion to potentially fraudulent claims.”

Whitmer is proposing $13 million for unemployment insurance fraud enforcement.

According to her proposed budget, this money will support the Attorney General’s Office and the Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity in prosecuting illegal unemployment insurance claims, as well as expanding the investigations staff.

Rep. Steve Johnson, a Republican from Wayland who as chair of the House Oversight Committee has pushed for changes at the Unemployment Insurance Agency, questioned Whitmer’s proposal.

Sponsor

“They waited until they lost $10 billion in fraud to do this?” Johnson asked in a text message to Bridge Michigan. “It’s a little late now.”

Paris disagreed, saying focusing on prosecuting claimants, who could also be innocent, is wrong.

“How can we say that there was an overpayment when none of these people have had their day in court? None of these people have even talked to a human claims examiner that understands unemployment law with a brain, let alone a neutral judge,” Paris said.

“Once all these cases are adjudicated, and it goes to the appeal process, then we'll get a rough estimate and what we believe is overpaid.”

How impactful was this article for you?

Only donate if we've informed you about important Michigan issues

See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:

  • “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
  • “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
  • “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.

If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate Now