You want police and trash service, right?

The news remains grim on the financial front for Michigan local governments. More survey data from local officials reported by the Center for Local, State and Urban Policy at U-M find Michigan's city, township and village governments are still being battered by a confluence of negative trends:

1. Declining state aid due to political decisions made in Lansing.

2. Declining local revenue due to a tough economy, joblessness and crashing property values.

3. Rising costs on key budget lines, especially health and retirement benefits for employees.

About half of the responding governments say they are less able to meet their fiscal responsibilities than in the previous year. And this constitutes good news, since the same figure was much higher a year ago.

"While the easing trend in which fewer jurisdictions report problems could continue and expand in the future, it seems equally if not somewhat more likely that fiscal trends will again turn negative for more and more local governments. Potential problems include the state of the Michigan and U.S. economies in the second half of 2011 and the possibility of a “double-dip recession,” the likelihood of further cost increases for health care and municipal service provision, the potential for further revenue declines tied to state policymakers’ focus on eliminating the personal property tax, and even Michigan’s constitutional caps on local government property tax revenue increases which could restrict revenue growth if or when the housing market finally begins to climb again," the report states.

And this week, word came out from the Snyder administration that its plan to repeal the personal property tax (which pumps $1.2 billion into local governments and schools) includes only partial replacement of the lost revenue from other sources. Any bets on whether the Legislature even agrees to Snyder's preferences? I could easily see the House and Senate voting to repeal PPT first and then "forgetting" to enact changes to generate any replacement revenue.

Make no mistake, local government finance is a major crisis in Michigan. It's inconvenient for state legislators to think about right now, but Michigan residents who care about the public services in their communities might want to help lawmakers "recast" their priorities.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Drew Paterson
Wed, 10/19/2011 - 12:45pm
Well yes it is becoming a crisis. But isn't that the time to deal with "rising health and retirement costs"? And why is the city or township in the trash pickup business anyway? It didn't used to be. Egregious examples of generous pensions "earned" after only a few years of "service" abound. The cycle of negotiations where management also gets what it gives led automotive into the notorious pension cost differential with the transplants and helped bring down those businesses. THOSE are the areas that need adult supervision - say, maybe a state auditor approval of local retirement and healthcare contracts? Some progress seems to being made between communities on sharing police and fire services. It is time to acknowledge that 10 dispatchers, police chiefs, fire chiefs, deputy chiefs, etc. aren't necessarily required for 10 small communities. There are efficiencies in government, just as industry has had to find iver the last few decades. It is well past time for government to get serious too. (And don't even start me on education!)