Michigan foundations take on a bigger role

Believe it or not, there is good news out there.

The news from Lansing may be, at the very best, mixed, and Washington had, even before the shutdown, fallen into a vast sinkhole of dysfunction, fueled by partisan and ideological wars.

Still, it may sooth the mind and rekindle a little optimism to consider these Michigan success stories:
The Kalamazoo Promise, funded by local wealthy families and facilitated by civic consensus, has literally changed the lives of hundreds by providing college tuition to those who graduate from Kalamazoo public schools. Along the way, it has strengthened the school system, firmed up the local housing market and provided a rallying call for a community under stress.

Grand Rapids’ ArtPrize has just finished handing out nearly half a million dollars to hundreds of artists whose work graced local streets and now draws hundreds of thousands to a thriving city every September. A local, state or federal government program? Nope. It’s all done through private, local philanthropy.

Detroit may well be ground zero of municipal failure. But many institutions that used to be creatures of the city -- Cobo Center, Eastern Market, Detroit Historical Museum -- have been off-loaded to non-public entities – and are thriving. Larger institutions – The Detroit Institute of Arts, The Detroit Zoo – remain technically city-owned, but are managed, funded, operated and run by separate nonprofits.
These examples highlight a significant movement quietly gaining ground under the surface of both our state and our community governmental institutions.

For generations, we assumed that various institutions of government were properly responsible for design and competent to manage activities aimed at the general good of our people. But increasingly, that’s sadly no longer the case.

Instead, what has grown up over the years at the core of many public bodies (which are all, to some extent, political institutions) are layers of encrustation by interests that tilt public policy and government activities toward their particular parochial benefit.
Here are a few examples:

Public sector unions have, in some places, won generous and ultimately unaffordable pay packages from city councils and school boards whose members are elected largely by union votes.

The start of the Michigan school year was delayed by the legislature until after Labor Day explicitly to benefit the tourism industry, not kids or their parents. And Detroit’s economic downfall certainly hasn’t been eased by continuing shortsighted pressure, as in the latest demand to keep squeezing an extra annual “13th check” out of the city’s underfunded public employee pension fund. Political corruption has hurt too, best typified by ex-Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick (2002-2008) and his infamous pay-to-play regime.

Sadly, the Great Recession that began in 2008 multiplied and intensified these tendencies. As resources became scarcer, competition among various interests increased.

Increasingly, it isn’t just cynical reporters who are sniffing out hidden interests that benefit from public initiatives.

Today, more and more, the public is raising basic questions about the design, direction and working of programs we once assumed were best left in the hands of government bodies -- bodies often publicly elected and, hence, by definition vulnerable to the claims (and cash contributions) of special interests.

So isn’t it time we start recognizing that other sectors in our society -- philanthropy, non-profits, even the business community -- should be playing increased roles in programs for the good of all? Isn’t it time we started looking hard at public-private partnerships as a new model for delivery of services to our citizens?

Today, indeed, the philanthropic community is pouring millions into restructuring and re-tasking many lagging public institutions. Michigan’s foundations, great and small, are heavily engaged: Kellogg, Mott, Kresge, Dow, Hudson-Webber, Skillman, McGregor, among others. And civic-minded businesses, often encouraged by Business Leaders for Michigan, are playing increasing roles: DTE, PVS Chemicals, Quicken Loans, Masco, Consumers Energy, Steelcase and the auto companies, to name a few.

The public turf is no longer the exclusive playing field of public and political institutions. This week, the Council of Michigan Foundations is holding its annual conference in Grand Rapids, built around the theme of new and creative partnerships. I cannot imagine a better time to launch a serious discussion about how the charitable and non-profit sectors can plan to increasingly help guide what used to be left in the hands of the politicians.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Mike R
Tue, 10/15/2013 - 1:32pm
I agree with Mr. Power that the increasing engagement of philanthropies appears to be a positive and hopeful development for Michigan in general and Detroit in particular. And I applaud those named in his column for the work and money they've committed so far. My only caution is that we need to be sure that sufficiently strong rules, laws, and protocols are in place to ensure that such partnerships do not come with strings attached that may not, ultimately, be in the best interests of the affected institutions or the public that owns them. There are many kinds of philanthropic organizations, and some of them have agendas that may not coincide with precepts of good governance and stewardship of the public trust. Availability of apparently free money and help from ostensible "white knights" should not tempt us to entanglement with organizations whose political, religious, moral, or financial goals are incompatible with our fundamental democratic principles.
Tue, 10/15/2013 - 8:46pm
Thank you to Bridge Magazine for highlighting the important contributions of the nonprofit and philanthropic sector in Michigan. Nonprofits are a huge employer and spark in our communities and economy. Our sector have been hard hit by the recession and many are still struggling to get back on solid footing. I encourage individuals to invest in your favorite nonprofit today to continue to give our organizations the capacity to innovate and meet the needs of Michigan's most vulnerable citizens- especially our children and youth. Michele Strasz, Executive Director, School-Community Health Alliance of Michigan
Wed, 10/16/2013 - 9:22pm
Well you've certainly revealed your political bent with this editorial. Yes indeed, Mr. Power, public sector unions and the wages they seek for their members are the cause and proof of government's inability to provide for the general good of the public. It couldn't be the giveaway of billions of public dollars to corporations and business under the laughable notion that they will use the money to 'create' jobs rather than line their own pockets, that has made it difficult for government to take care of its citizens. (Jobs are created when average people have money and can afford to buy things, not when the bloated bank accounts of the rich leak a little money back to the masses.) Government works very well when the conservative agenda to intentionally make it ineffective is kept in check. This notion that private works better than public is nonsense and partisan as the day is long. I will take my chances with a government program run by elected officials any day, before relying on the whim of some rich individual or foundation to provide for important needs. It is not the idea of public-private partnerships I object to, it is your assertion that they are necessary because of governmental incompetence. These problems exist due to people with your ideological bias purposefully undermining our government. This editorial is a thinly veiled attempt to further that faulty notion. Government by the people and for the people, Mr. Power. Of course, now a corporation is people too thanks to the conservative majority on the US Supreme Ct. Hey wait, now that corporations are people, the government should be even better! After all, you named about a dozen in your editorial as the answer to our poor dysfunctional government.