Michigan environmentalists aren’t hiding on climate change after 2012 ballot defeat

Proposal 3 was soundly defeated last November, with 62 percent of voters rejecting a constitutional amendment to set higher renewable energy standards. But its supporters are not demoralized.

Proposal 3 would have required 25 percent of the state’s electrical generation come from renewable resources by 2025. Today, several members of the Michigan Energy/Michigan Jobs coalition are continuing their activities and, they say, making progress.

Ironically, it's coming via one of Proposal 3's highest-profile opponents: Gov. Rick Snyder.

Despite Snyder's opposition, he has said the state needs to do more with renewable energy. And leading up to a proposal he is expected to make in the fall, Snyder also called for a series of public hearings and discussions on the state’s energy usage.

It is through those hearings that the clean-energy coalition has been asserting itself.

“We have been thrilled with the governor’s leadership,” said Julie Lyons Bricker, executive director of the Berkley-based Michigan Interfaith Power and Light association. The group works with religious congregations across the state to help them learn more about energy efficiency and alternative energy.

Hugh McDiarmid with the Michigan Environmental Council said supporters of Proposal 3 are helping educate communities about alternative energy and hoping to make an impact on Snyder’s expected proposal.

They have been helped by a report from the Public Service Commission, showing costs for alternative electric generation has dropped. DTE Energy is also substantially cutting the surcharge customers pay on alternative energy.

While it is unlikely Snyder will propose anything like Proposal 3's 25 percent threshold, coalition members say they want to encourage him to call for as much alternative generation as possible and support his ongoing efforts.

They also are working to develop more public interest in the issue.

Bricker said there is substantial interest in alternative energy from many disparate groups.

One coalition member also said the effort is being helped by financial realities utilities face today. Banks are less likely to lend to build coal plants, this coalition member, who did not want to be identified, said, because of long-term concerns.

And one goal, said Anne Woiwode, state director for the Sierra Club, is to make constant progress in the usage of alternative energy, even if the rest of the world continues to rely on fossil fuels.

A report in 2012 said that in India and China, two of the fastest-growing economies in the planet, as many as four new coal-burning electric plants will open every week for the next several years.

That might make efforts in Michigan seem futile, but Woiwode said what progress is made here has to be seen in light of “the very long path to accomplish what we have to do.”

The Sierra Club itself works internationally to discourage the use of coal. While China and India are using tremendous amounts, they also have strong alternative energy operations, especially in China.

And China is confronting levels of pollution, lifestyle and health issues that were once common in the industrial U.S., which means that nation may take coal's drawbacks more seriously, Woiwode said.

“We should be making sure we lead” on clean energy usage, she said.  “If we make smart decisions those can be replicated across the country and the world.”

John Lindstrom is publisher of Gongwer News Service Michigan, a subscription service that covers daily activities at the Capitol and in state government. Lindstrom is a graduate of Michigan State University and has worked in Michigan journalism for more than three decades.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Gene Markel
Sun, 08/04/2013 - 10:27am
Global Warming 101 If you took High School Biology, Chemistry and Physics the following should be easy to understand. Coal, Oil and Natural Gas are products of Solar Energy, Carbon Dioxide CO2 and Water and H2O. The evolution of plants gave them the ability to convert CO2 and H2O into Cellulous Carbon by means of Photosynthesis. When the Cellulous Carbon plant dies it decomposes into Coal, Oil and Natural Gas our Hydrocarbon Fuels. As human beings we extract Hydrocarbon Fuels from the earth and burn them through a chemical reaction called combustion. The products of combustion are Heat, CO2 and H2O. Heat is stored solar energy that is released back into the atmosphere. CO2 and H2O are the products of Photosynthesis. Based on the fact that we are destroying the lungs of the earth by destroying our forests, that uses Photosynthesis process to reconstitute the CO2 and H2O into Cellulous Carbon. The CO2 and H2O have nowhere to go. As the concentration of CO2 and H2O increases in the atmosphere, it has the ability to absorb more heat. More heat means Global Warming.
Big D
Thu, 08/08/2013 - 8:16am
Here's an analogy: Humans made boats, then ships, then super tankers. These vessels when travelling on the oceans make waves (their wake). Waves beat on the shore and cause erosion and damage our homes and other structures. Sometimes the waves are truly destructive. Therefore we must ban all vessels.
Big D
Thu, 08/08/2013 - 8:09am
I'm sure the Michigan faithful are thankful for the out-of-state funding coming from organizations that want more wind PTC. Follow the money. Until these environmental whackos realize and accept that the only truly viable renewable energy source that is environmentally benign is nuclear (see "Pandora's Promise"), we're wasting time, money and resources and messing things up. New reactor technology doesn't create huge amounts of waste, it actually consumes waste we have stored. No CO2. Safer than todays safest form of generation, which is teaditional nuclear. Civilization turns on energy, disadvantaged people can only advance through the availability of more energy. Wake up.