Mining boom roils Upper Peninsula

Ron and Carol Henriksen retired to the kind of place most people can only imagine -- a riverfront house in an area of the Western Upper Peninsula that is so serene, the dominant sound is often the whisk of trees rustling in the wind.

After living in suburband Chicago for three decades, in the path of jets coming and going from O’Hare Airport, the Henriksens coveted peace and quiet.

“Our dream was to retire on our six acres of land along the Menominee River,” Ron Henriksen said. “I was going to fish, maybe raise some chickens; we were going to live happily ever after.”

Instead, they found themselves drawn into a raging debate over what could become a 21st century mining boom in the Upper Peninsula.

Five foreign mining firms are targeting deposits of nickel, gold and other valuable minerals at as many as 14 sites in the Western Upper Peninsula. One of the planned mine sites is a half-mile from the Henriksens’ personal paradise.

Unlike the copper and iron mines that made the U.P. one of the nation’s most prosperous regions in the late 1800s, the new mining companies are pursuing precious metals that are trapped in bedrock containing high concentrations of sulfide ore. When exposed to air and water, sulfide ore produces sulfuric acid, which can poison streams and groundwater if allowed to drain off a mine site.

The potential boom in metallic sulfide mining has divided the U.P.

Supporters claim new mines will provide sorely needed, well-paying  jobs and help meet increasing global demand for copper, nickel and other metals.

Previous coverage

Mines digging into U.P. free of key state tax

Taxation on resources varies widely among states

“People can’t have cars and other modern necessities without metal,” said Theodore J. Bornhorst, a professor of economic and engineering geology at Michigan Technological University and director of the university’s A.E. Seaman Mineral Museum. “Many people don’t realize that the computers and cell phones they use have nickel, copper and other metals in them.”

Critics fear metallic sulfide mines will pollute many of the high-quality rivers and lakes that make the U.P. special.

“This is a water-rich environment; this is not the place for any mines that produce acid mine drainage,” said Kristi Mills, co-owner of Big Bay Outfitters in Marquette County and executive director of Save the Wild U.P., an anti-mining group.

Bornhorst and state officials who regulate the mining industry disagreed.

“Can this type of mining be done and companies keep their discharges below acceptable limits? Yes,”  Bornhorst said. “We have the technology to do it right and do it safely.” 

Digging under way near Marquette

The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality already has approved one controversial metallic sulfide mine, the $469 million Kennecott Eagle Minerals project near Marquette. That project also withstood a court challenge.

Crews in September began digging the shaft at the Eagle mine, which will pursue a lucrative ore body located directly under the headwaters of the Salmon Trout River. The mine could yield 300 million pounds of nickel and 250 million pounds of copper, which could be worth $5 billion.

Further west, Toronto-based Orvana Minerals Corp. applied in September for a state permit to open a copper mine near the Lake Superior coast, in Ironwood Township.

At least three other Canadian firms are exploring possible mining sites in the western U.P.

One of those firms, Aquila Resources, wants to open a gold and zinc mine about 20 miles north of Menominee, near the Henriksens’ house.

Aquila announced in September that the mine, called the Back Forty Project, could yield 902,000 ounces of gold, 11 million ounces of silver, 961 million pounds of zinc and 78 million pounds of copper.

State officials said the Back Forty Project would be Michigan’s first open-pit metallic sulfide mine. It would include the requisite pile of mine tailings and a processing plant where rocks would be pulverized. Cyanide would be used to extract gold from the crushed rock.

Residents near the planned mine site fear it may disrupt a way of life in a peaceful area of cabins and hunting camps.

“We came up here to recreate and get away from the noise of society -- now this mining company is bringing it to us,” said Mike Boerner, whose family has owned a house and large tract of land adjacent to the mining site for more than a century.

Officials from Aquila Resources didn’t return calls or emails seeking comment.

Many people who oppose metallic sulfide mining in the U.P. base their concerns on problems at similar mines in other states and nations.

“Severe worldwide ecological consequences, especially for aquatic resources, have resulted from mining ore deposits with acid forming minerals. The track record of industry is replete with problems,” according to a 2008 study by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

But Michigan Tech's Bornhorst said mining gets a bad rap because companies in the past often left unsightly reminders of their existence -- gaping craters and large piles of mine tailings, some of which were toxic.

“Modern mining has a very small footprint,” he said. “Mining’s footprint is much smaller than forestry’s footprint.”

Scenic areas becoming flashpoint

On Michigan’s official state map, there is an area of the Upper Peninsula that is devoid of lines marking the location of paved roads; the only features denoted are rivers and moose.

The remote area is found in western Marquette County, south of the resort town of Big Bay and north of the former mining community of Champion. It is where the state of Michigan in 1985 deposited 29 moose that were airlifted from Canada in a daring operation called Operation Moose Lift.

That area was selected for the moose reintroduction effort because the majestic animals thrive where there are few people and nature predominates.

Until recently, western sections of Marquette County were known primarily for its stunning array of natural features: Extensive forests, countless waterfalls, the scenic Yellow Dog Plains; the rugged McCormick Tract Wilderness Area; and two spectacular rivers -- the Yellow Dog and Salmon Trout -- that flow into Lake Superior.

Now the area is also known as ground zero for the debate over metallic sulfide mining in the U.P.

Kennecott Eagle Minerals in September begin blasting and digging the shaft at its $469 million Eagle mine, located south of Big Bayon the Yellow Dog Plains. Other companies also hope to build mines in the area.

Hal Fitch, director of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality’s Office of Geological Survey, said there is intense interest in mining for mineral rich sulfide ore in the Baraga Basin, a geologic formation in northern Marquette County.

“I think there is a quite a bit of potential for finding (economically viable) deposits,” Fitch said.

Several state lawmakers from the Upper Peninsula want the state to make it easier to open new mines.

“We need to spur interest in exploring the commodities of the Upper Peninsula because in both the timber and mining industries the current regulations make it difficult and expensive to get the raw materials they need to be successful,” said state Rep. Matt Huuki, a Republican from the community of Atlantic Mine, in a recent press release. 

Balancing jobs, environment

Dozens of copper and iron mines were scattered across the Upper Peninsula in the 1800s and early 1990s. Just two are left at the Cliffs Natural Resources facility in Marquette County.

DEQ Director Dan Wyant said the administration of Gov. Rick Snyder is “very open” to creating new jobs by promoting extractive industries such as mining, logging and oil and natural gas exploration.

 We are full partners in economic development,” Wyant said of the DEQ. “We’ve got to have a clean environment and protect the citizens of Michigan, but without economic activity and more jobs, we’re not going to be able to do that.”

Wyant said Michigan could support more mines, logging operations and more oil and natural gas wells without ruining the natural resources that are the foundation of the region’s industry.

Extractive industries and tourism are core elements of the Upper Peninsula economy. One-third of all Upper Peninsula jobs are tied to the extraction and processing of natural resources, and those jobs pay above average wages, according to a state study.


That same study found that half of all jobs in the U.P. are tied to tourism, but many of those jobs are part-time or seasonal and most pay below average wages.

Mining was one of the sectors of the Upper Peninsula’s economy to add jobs in recent years, according to state data.

Statewide, however, mining is a relatively small part of Michigan’s economy. Michigan’s $17 billion tourism industry was eight times more valuable than the $2 billion mining industry in 2010, according to state data.

Tourism employs about 193,000 people in Michigan, about 30 times more than the number of direct mining jobs and five times more than all jobs tied to mining, according to state and industry data.

But the average pay of a mine worked, about $85,000, dwarfs the income of most people working in tourism.

Ron Henriksen said he supports job creation. He even supports mining, provided it can be conducted without polluting the environment and jeopardizing human health. He doesn’t think that’s possible at metallic sulfide mines

But after spending seven years of his retirement fighting the Back Forty Project, the Henriksens recently threw in the towel. They and several of their neighbors along the Menominee River recently sold their homes and land to Aquila Resources, the company that wants to build the open-pit gold mine.

“We bailed because the stress of fighting this mine was getting to me and my wife, it was affecting our health,” Ron Henriksen said. “This fight over the Back Forty mine will last another 10 years. I don’t want to spend the rest of my life doing this.”

Like what you’re reading in Bridge? Please consider a donation to support our work!

We are a nonprofit Michigan news site focused on issues that impact all citizens. In an era of click bait and biased news, we focus on taking the time to learn both sides of a story before we post it. Bridge stories are always free, but our work costs money. If our journalism helps you understand and love Michigan more, please consider supporting our work. It takes just a moment to donate here.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Graydon DeCamp
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 2:59pm
This is a pretty balanced look at the UP mining issues, but I wonder if the writer or editors ever considered profiling and interviewing a few people like the Hendricksons who favor the resurgence of real economic activity in the UP? Having spent two decades of outstanding bass, pike and trout fishing within a few miles of the uranium mines of Elliott Lake, Ontario, I know first hand that man's enjoyment of the natural environment is not necessarily threatened by the ancient and honorable business of mining.
Thu, 11/03/2011 - 10:48pm
If you don't see it, then it doesn't exist? There are millions of tonnes of radioactive tailings left over from uranium mining operations near Eliot Lake, Ontario. And what lurks behind the hills south of Negaunee, Michigan? Growing heaps of gray waste rock and ever-expanding tailings basins from the operations of the Cliffs Empire and Tilden mines. Try Google Earth for an aerial view. Hardrock mining typically operates on a large scale and involves multiple operations--extraction, beneficiation and processing--with their accompanying risks to the environment. According to the EPA's Toxic Release Inventory, the metals mining industry released 1.3 billion pounds of toxins in 2002, 27% of all toxics released by U.S. industry. Small footprint? From Rio Tinto's website: "How big is the Bingham Canyon Mine? The mine is so big it can be seen by Space Shuttle astronauts as they pass over the United States." And take a look at this! Huge Holes in the Earth: Open-Pit Mines Seen From Space From the Deseret News: Dr. Brian Moench, president and co-founder of Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment...said air pollution is to blame for 1,000 to 2,000 premature deaths in Salt Lake County each year, according to a formula used by the American Heart Association. He said medical research also more conclusively links air pollution to DNA-level reproductive damage and prenatal stress that can lead to an early onset of neuro-degenerative diseases like Parkinson's and Alzheimer's...In simplified terms, Kennecott contributes one third of the county's airborne pollutants, Moench said. Kennecott's Bingham canyon mine has created a huge water pollution problem, as well. So much for the small footprint.
Joe Harmon
Fri, 11/04/2011 - 12:10pm
It seems to me the only people that are against the mining are implants from other areas.
Bill Wood
Tue, 06/14/2016 - 3:26pm
We have a home on the river approx 1 mile south of where this mine will go. How about our investment. Our home will be worth $0.00. The noise, dust, lights 24 hours a day. Who would want to live by this thing. Being that we are in Wisconsin, we get no info on this. Everyone just thinks about this area as being remote wilderness. It is not that way. It is a quite area, but won't be for long with the mine. My wife and I are just sick about this. We planned on retiring here and have invested a lot of money in this property and it will be worthless. What if the containment area leaks and the river becomes affected, what about our wells, what about breathing in the toxic fumes from the acid dust and rain. Does anyone care?