Talent & Education

EMU prez: Tuition is 'safety valve' for state budget

Posted on: January 12, 2012Written by:Ron FrenchTopic:Talent & Education

Tags:College Costs, college tuition, Eastern Michigan University, James Blanchard, Suzanne Martin, William G. Milliken

Legislators know universities are going to make up lost state revenue by raising tuition. In fact, that’s what makes cutting funds to higher education so easy, says Eastern Michigan University President Sue Martin.

Martin knows what she’s talking about. She has a Ph.D. in accounting. She was deputy state treasurer under Govs. William Milliken and James Blanchard, helping formulate state budgets. She’s been in higher education for the past 22 years, with a front row seat as state funding plummeted and tuitions skyrocketed.

A Bridge Magazine analysis  found that Michigan’s public universities are more expensive than public universities in almost any other state, forcing students to pay what amounts to a college tax.

Martin explained how it works:

With Michigan mired in a decade-long recession, state budgets have been tight. Legislators see funding for public universities as an easy place to cut, because “universities have a safety valve of tuition that can be raised” to make up for lost state funding, Martin said.

If the Michigan Department of Transportation loses money, potholes aren’t filled. If public universities lose money, they can raise tuition and keep the lights on and the professors paid -- and everybody's happy.

Everybody, that is, except the students footing larger bills. Michigan students today leave campus with an average of about $25,000 in student loans.

“I paid taxes with the expectation that affordable college education would be there,” Martin said. “To neglect this problem is foolish in the long-term.”

Read 6 comments

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Jump to 6 comments

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Comments

Jim
Thu, 01/12/2012 - 9:07am
Why doesn't the Bridge actually try to write an article that is informative? Give the whole picture. Pick a couple of somewhat the same schools in a few states. Then, provide how much a degree costs at each and how much the state pays and how much the students pays at each. Provide a little information on how much of the student debt in Michigan is due to either the over-charging of the schools or how much is due to the state under-support of the schools.
Geoff Larcom
Thu, 01/12/2012 - 10:36am
It is important to note that Eastern Michigan University president Susan Martin has worked very hard to reduce the tuition burden on Eastern's students and their families. Under her leadership, Eastern has decidedly not exploited the "safety valve" of raising tuition in the wake of greatly decreased state funding. For the past three years, EMU has - by far - led the state of Michigan in tuition restraint. This included the 0-0-0 campaign for the academic year 2010-11, when EMU froze tuition, fees and housing costs. The past three years, Eastern’s overall increase in tuition has averaged just 2.5 percent, the lowest increase in the state, and students are paying only $20 more per credit hour than 3 years ago. EMU students now pay the third lowest annual tuition among the state's 15 public universities, yet EMU has continued to invest in crucial academic facilities such as the recent renovation of the Pray-Harrold classroom building. The comparative student cost figures cited in this very thorough Bridge series, while a relevant measuring stick in many cases, predate these moves by President Martin. Note: Geoff Larcom, who worked as an editor and reporter for The Ann Arbor News for 25 years, is now executive director of media relations at Eastern Michigan University. His beats included covering academics and administration at the University of Michigan and at Eastern Michigan University.
Jim
Thu, 01/12/2012 - 10:39am
Not really. You just published an article about State Rep. Bob Genetski an "outspoken critic of how universities spend money". Well, which is it? Are MI universities spending money comparable to how schools in other states spend money? Of that roughly $8500 more per year that Barbara pays more than Caroline how much is due to "how Michigan Universities spend money" and how much is due to lack of Michigan's support for Universities?
Robert
Thu, 01/12/2012 - 10:45am
I've met Sue Martin, and she is a very reasonable person. As an alumnus of EMU, I can tell you she has worked harder than any other university president in this state to hold down tuition. She is right, we are being foolish. All in the name of not raising taxes. I've worked for large corporations/organizations and they are no more efficient than the government. Improved efficiency will only carry us so far. At some point we have to decide what we value enough to pay for.
Larry
Thu, 01/12/2012 - 12:33pm
I don't see that the state universities in Michigan are lacking in finding students so it must be a reasonable cost relative to their other options (private universities and out of state tuition). The state has no business funding university education as it benefits the few at the expense of the many (via higher taxes).