In Grand Rapids, a tale of two kids

Like any mother, Grand Rapids resident Courtney Malone wants the best for her children.

That's why she worries about her 3-year-old son, Bryson, who is on a waiting list for the state's Great Start Readiness Program. She fears he could be losing ground by missing out on the all-day preschool.

"It's very disappointing," said Malone, 38.

"Great Start is just such a great program. When kids go to kindergarten, they have to know so much. They really need a program to prepare them for kindergarten."

Perhaps that's why another Grand Rapids resident, Zakia Cottle, feels so fortunate her daughter, Journey, 4, was admitted to the free preschool program for low- and moderate-income families. Lack of state funding means thousands of children like Bryson are not so lucky.

"I was so happy she got in," said Cottle, 40. "I think it does get them prepared. It starts that foundation. It's a good start."

But there is evidence beyond the instincts of two mothers that this program makes a difference in the lives of children.

A study released earlier this year by Michigan's Department of Education concluded the program helps students avoid repeating grades and graduate on time.

Conducted by the Highscope Educational Research Foundation, the study found that 57 percent of those enrolled in the program graduated from high school compared to 43 percent in a group not in the program.

It was based on a sample of 338 pre-schoolers enrolled in the program in 1995 and 258 students of the same age and background who did not attend the program.

These graduation rate differences were largely due to the preschool program's effect on grade retention, according to the study. By 12th grade, only 37 percent of those who attended the preschool program had repeated a grade while 49 percent of those who did not attend the program did.

Joanne Kelty, director of early childhood for Grand Rapids Public Schools, said scores of needy students are left on waiting lists for the program each year. She said the task of deciding which students get in – largely based on family income – is a difficult one for teachers.

"It's very tough. My teachers agonize over it. They know the kids need it," Kelty said.

Kelty said 548 students were admitted the fall to the program for either full- or half-time sessions. Another 48 are to be admitted after Oct. 1.

But Kelty said each year about 150 students are denied entry for lack of space, with the likelihood that many more needy and qualified families never apply.

"There are many more unserved that don't know about the program," she said.

That is certainly not the case for Courtney Malone, and her husband, Wendell, 42.

Their two older children, Kyla, 6, and Jonathan, 5, were admitted to the program. The Malones are convinced it launched them on the path to educational success.

"They were both completely prepared for kindergarten. When the kids go to kindergarten, they have to know so much more. They really need a program to prepare them," Courtney Malone said.

The Malones believe they were bumped from a potential slot for Bryson when Courtney went from part- to full-time hours in her job as a social worker. Wendell is a surveyor.

And so now they wait for a slot to open.

"I am still hopeful," Courtney Malone said.

For Zakia Cottle, the preschool program marks a beginning for Journey that she hopes leads to college. Cottle, a manicurist, has about a year-and-a-half of college, while her husband, Mark, 42, who works for Manpower, got as far as his junior year in college.

"I just think that college gives you a universal language. It's the start of a great adulthood. With a college degree you are able to compete."

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Jeffrey L Salisbury
Sun, 09/30/2012 - 7:56am
I’m still trying to figure out who and what is REALLY behind all this Pre-K push. Is there a disparity in the quality and even existence of such programs from school district to school district …wealthy to poor, from community to community…? Yes, just as there is for any number of other academic, co-curricular and extra-curricular and even community education programming. But… There’s no evidence to show any long-term academic benefits – on the contrary, studies show the opposite. There’s no evidence to show there’s any legislative support to provide additional funds for such programs. There’s no evidence to show local parents or local or even state-wide parent groups are clamoring for such programs. There’s no evidence to show a surplus of qualified early-childhood educators available for such programs. There’s no evidence to show any experienced classroom educators or educational researchers with actual classroom experience demanding such programs. In "All The President's Men" - the author's then-anonymous news source advised, "Follow the money..." and I am thinking that may be good advice when it comes to the drumbeat clamoring for Pre-Kindergarten programming in Michigan.
Jeff Salisbury
Sun, 09/30/2012 - 9:20am
REALLY want to know what’s behind this Pre-K drumbeat? Just might reveal there's a not-so-silent point of view to Bridge magazine too. This may help. large urban and suburban areas, large employers are the biggest proponents of universal PreK; not for the Education, but for the child care. Productivity is lost when employees are off the job or distracted because of child care issues. Some days, ironically kids are absent because the usual child care arrangement fell through, and older sibling has to stay home to babysit. And yes actually there is a clamoring for it from (mostly) mothers who are working low wage jobs, raising children with low wage fathers or no fathers at all. Covering the cost of daycare is a major concern. If you listen you hear it every election cycle as we’re in just now. Obviously there are other issues playing into this problem, but the clamor for PreK all comes down to babysitting, not educating. The campaigns for universal PreK push the Education aspect, but this is all about daycare. The author of the above link/article has this one mostly correct.