Report: Michigan must spend billions more a year to modernize infrastructure

LANSING — Michigan needs to come up with at least $4 billion more per year if the state is to close a gap in spending on its infrastructure needs, according to a report to be released today by a commission formed to study the issue.

The 21st Century Infrastructure Commission, appointed by Gov. Rick Snyder, concluded that the state would need to spend in excess of $60 billion more over 20 years just to fix existing infrastructure systems. (That would come to something over $3 billion a year, not $4 billion; a spokesman for the commission said $4 million more is needed in the first years but the amount might fluctuate in later years).

The commission and Snyder plan to release the full report at an event this morning in Dearborn.
In addition to the price tag, the report’s executive summary is also notable for what is not mentioned. Through seven pages of recommendations on updating roads, bridges and water systems, including three mentions of the need to modernize the Soo Locks, there is not a single reference to Flint. That city’s drinking water was poisoned as a result of government failures, and the resulting uproar was the impetus for evaluating the state’s overall infrastructure needs. The summary does make references to replacing aging water systems, however.

Among the state’s critical shortcomings related to infrastructure — including roads, drinking water, sewers and storm systems, energy transmission and broadband Internet — is the fact that it doesn’t have a statewide database that can keep track of numerous systems, nor does it coordinate planning well among various governmental agencies, according to an executive summary of the report released to Bridge and Crain’s.

There are infrastructure systems in the state that are essentially unknown, said S. Evan Weiner, the commission’s chairman and chief operating officer and executive vice president of Detroit-based Edw. C. Levy Co., a construction materials conglomerate that specializes in such areas as steel mill services and road construction.

Before infrastructure managers can develop solutions, he said, they need to have data at their fingertips — where infrastructure systems are located, what condition they’re in, how old they are.
“We put the facts out there,” said Weiner, who added that the commission developed more than 100 recommendations. “We went right to it and we said, ‘Here’s the problem. Here’s what it’ll cost to fix it.’

“We can’t be scared of a big number,” he added. “We’ve got to prioritize what we need.”

Snyder tasked the 27-member commission, which was announced in his State of the State address in January, with recommending policy solutions to fix Michigan’s crumbling infrastructure. Michigan ranked last in the nation for its infrastructure — a grade of D — on the American Society of Civil Engineers’ last state infrastructure report card in 2009.

This isn’t solely a Michigan problem, either. The Reston, Va.-based engineering group estimated that only 57 percent of the $3.3 trillion in infrastructure repairs needed nationwide by 2025 are funded.

Still, the report noted, Michigan devotes a smaller percentage of its overall spending on infrastructure needs than other states. Citing U.S. Census data, the report summary said Michigan spends 6.4 percent of total expenditures on state and local capital spending. The U.S. average is 10.2 percent, the report said.

The commission’s report suggests the need is large, though Weiner said it’s not insurmountable. Many of the state’s 1,390 community water systems are at least 50 years old, according to the report; it said 11 million jobs would be lost across the U.S. if the Soo Locks went down for six months, 1,200 bridges are structurally deficient and nearly 500,000 households don’t have broadband Internet access.

The group recommended:

  • Creating an asset management pilot database in a region of the state to collect and report data on the condition of infrastructure systems.
  • Forming a Michigan Infrastructure Council, a statewide clearinghouse for data on infrastructure systems. It would be responsible for maintaining the asset management database, coming up with a long-term strategy and priorities and finding funding.
  • Finding a sustainable funding model that could rely on a mix of user fees, private-sector investment and government dollars to pay for repairs.
  • Using updated technology to create efficient infrastructure systems and aid planning.
  • Replacing aging water systems, from drinking water to sewers, while investing in environmentally sustainable ways to manage storm water.
  • Building a new lock in Sault Ste. Marie within the Soo Locks system.
  • Investing in cybersecurity and intelligent vehicle systems.

“Our state’s infrastructure challenges are serious and wide-ranging, and we need to act with urgency to improve our infrastructure systems and make Michigan an even better place to live,” Gov. Rick Snyder said in a statement.

“Safe and reliable infrastructure is critically important to the health and wellbeing of the people of Michigan and will help support our growing economy in the future. Our state is poised to be a global leader in emerging technologies as we move forward in the 21st century, so it is essential that we have the infrastructure to match our goals.”

Snyder proposed depositing $165 million into a new state infrastructure fund this year; the Legislature opted to contribute $5 million during this year’s budget process.

Michigan’s general fund will continue to face competing spending pressures, especially once a road-funding package adopted last year is fully funded in 2021, Weiner said. That plan requires half of its $1.2 billion price tag to come from existing spending.

As the economy improves, it makes sense to use some general fund money as seed funding for an infrastructure bank or to secure matching funds if the state can afford to do so, Weiner said. The commission did not try to suggest how much money would be needed or how it should be spent, he added, preferring to leave that decision to policymakers.

“We really need to have user-pay principles, and we really need to have leverage with the low-interest environment that we have,” Weiner said. “We really need to find federal (and) other mechanisms and means to reach the people that are willing to pay for these additional services.”

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Mon, 12/05/2016 - 8:27am
from the Michigan lottery, they gasoline tax .the unemployment fund,bottle returnfund . the tourist fund.salestax etc etcThe fund from the Census tax coming in 2020..registertion fee from citizen moving into the State of michigan.Student from out of State fund, etc etc and from pie backing contest .from apple pie to cream pie contest in each legislators country board.etcetc a charge to have your picture taken with your State rep. contest for the older tree, church, county house, hotel .street, well buy now you get the picture..Or the best idea since the Citizen Voted Legalize mairhjuana and collect the tax like coloradan does, millions a months just waiting..
Mon, 12/05/2016 - 8:34am
How about if we start by having the lawmakers involved in lawsuits about the Flint water crisis pay their own legal fees, instead of Michigan taxpayers? Lawmakers tried to hide the truth, and when they got caught expect state to pay their legal fees....just saying....
Mon, 12/05/2016 - 10:44am
Thank you Lois, my thoughts precisely. Bridge Magazine and NPR did a great investigative report on the Flint Water Crisis, which points to all of the corruption and lying that has occurred with this administration that made a bad problem worse. The State of MI government is being investigated at all levels of government, shows up in university classes on how not to handle this type of crisis and has been the topic of several documentaries. The whole problem started with a penny wise, pound foolish decision made by an emergency manager to save money in the short term, supported by the State of MI personnel who were not only inexperienced but were also arrogant liars. The initial problem was the lack of corrosion control in the water system(lack of knowledge, inexperienced people?), but the coverup and lack of accountability by senior administration is the real issue. \Every lead water line must be replaced in Flint before the problem will be solved, and every time it comes to funding this initiative, there is push back by state legislators. This administration has famously denied, ignored, scapegoated, and blamed others for their incompetence and have still not been held accountable. A competent pediatrician, a concerned mom whose son was poisoned by lead, an Virginia professor and his students gave all the proof anyone needed and they were denigrated by this administration, when they were telling the truth. One of the most vulnerable cities in Michigan has been allowed to be treated this way and still no accountability. This is pathetic.
Barry Visel
Mon, 12/05/2016 - 11:27am
I believe I just read the WVa prof said Flint may not have to replace all those lines.
Mon, 12/05/2016 - 8:43am
If state and federal governments were to actually spend real money to maintain our infrastructure, then there wouldn't be any money to give back to one-percenters in tax cuts. People gotta pay for the privilege of being owned.
Mon, 12/05/2016 - 8:51am
Do not forget Livingston County where massive sewer construction stands empty. About 15 years ago, during the boom and easy money, huge capacity was built that is sitting idle. Guess who is paying for all that idle capacity?
Mon, 12/05/2016 - 9:10am
If people were held personally liable for actions taken while executing their office, a person that couldn't afford the legal fees would have to back down whenever they were threatened with legal action. In this case it would be a gracious gesture because Snyder can in fact afford it, but the precedent is there for a reason. Also $ 3 million in legal fees in a single year is a drop in the bucket when compared to $3 Billion a year every year. This is going to take bold leadership and some tough reprioritization. Where is that going to come from? Haven't seen that in Lansing since Bill Milliken and Soapy Williams.
Barry Visel
Mon, 12/05/2016 - 10:11am
Is there a link to the commissions report? From this article I gather the commission simply restated/updated numbers regarding the apparent severity of the problem...something we've already been told in various reporting. Was there no attempt to assign responsibility (private, local, state, Feds)? What did this commission accomplish that we already didn't know? And what, for crying out loud, will an "Infrastructure Council" cost us? Don't we already pay legislators and bureaucrats to do this? Finally. If we really do need more money, simply start collecting what we don't collect now...over $30 Billion each year in tax expenditures. Maybe we do need to hire a rocket scientist!...(paid for by eliminating MDOT, MDEQ, and any other State agency involved with infrastructure that this report apparently says haven't done their jobs). PS, I'm glad the report didn't mention Flint, because then it would have to mention every other specific problem, just to be fair. PSS, OK, my comments sound somewhat like a rant, but consider when it comes to the bottom line I, and all the other Michiganders who pay taxes and user fees, will end up paying for this. I want more for my money than it appears this report produced. Go Broncos!
Mary Peterson
Mon, 12/05/2016 - 10:31am
Here come the toll roads. This is what happens when people do not want to pay taxes. There are some things that government must do. If we have toll roads no free passes legislators; pay your way like the rest of us .