Too poor for a homeless shelter? Only in Michigan

In Michigan, some families may be too poor to stay at a homeless shelter.

That’s the sad reality facing some Michigan families who will be facing the double-whammy of being cut off from cash assistance Oct. 1, and being kicked out of homeless shelters because they then have no source of income – a requirement in some shelters meant as temporary housing for those trying to get back on their feet.

A single mother with three children is currently staying at Haven House in East Lansing. Because the woman has received cash assistance for more than 48 months in her lifetime, her assistance will be cut off Oct. 1, as part of a new lifetime limit on welfare imposed by the state.

Haven House only allows families to stay at the homeless shelter for 30 days if the family has no income. The woman’s only income was the cash assistance she was receiving from the Department of Human Services.

In effect, the woman will be too poor to stay at the shelter come Nov. 1, said Haven House Executive Director Angie Mayeaux .
“I can give them 30 days (with no income), but I can’t extend it any longer, because there’s no chance they’ll be moving into (their own) housing,” Mayeaux said. “They’ll have to move.”

If the family has no male children over the age of 12, there is another shelter in Ingham County to which they can move; if they have a male child over 12, they’re out of luck.

“Some families find friends and family they can stay with, but that doesn’t last long,” Mayeaux said.

At Haven House, over half of residents typically have no income other than welfare cash assistance, Mayeaux said. As more and more are kicked off the dole for reaching the 48-month limit, Mayeaux envisions a housing crisis.

“We’re very nervous as to what is going to happen,” she said. “We've already doubled the number of people coming here with no income from last year (even before the 48-month limit goes into effect). There is no safety net. There’s not just a big crack, there’s a giant gaping hole that is sucking people in.”

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Wed, 09/28/2011 - 9:44am
I know some take advantage of state programs that are not eligible for them but why put everyone in that group. Simply out state leaders either don't care or don't have the ability to run a program to help our needy. Making wholesale cuts to programs only hurts our truly needy. Those that were cheating are the ones who get hurt as they didn't really depend on the benefits in the first place. Isn't what the state really wants is for thses people to leave the state?