At 25, Americans With Disabilities Act about more than bathrooms and parking

This year marks the 25th anniversary of the Americans With Disabilities Act, which protects the disabled from discrimination in the workplace and elsewhere. To mark the occasion, Bridge asked Dan Swanson, a Southfield employment attorney who handles ADA-related litigation, to answer some questions about it, via email.

The Americans With Disabilities Act – the ADA – is as significant for disabled Americans as the Civil Rights Act was for people of color, but for most of the able-bodied, we see it as mainly being about parking spaces and bathrooms. Can you relate a couple examples of cases you've handled where the ADA played a significant role?

Over the years, I have represented numerous people with a wide variety of physical and mental disabilities who lost their jobs due to discrimination. But for the ADA, they would have had no means to challenge their employers’ unlawful behavior.

One recent case involved “Gary,” an HIV-positive man whose disability caused him to periodically suffer chronic or recurrent extreme fatigue, diarrhea, neuropathy, severe headaches and depression. For more than four years, Gary successfully worked for a large, nationwide retailer as a distribution center manager with an annual salary in excess of $125,000. During his first three years of employment, he was promoted, received good performance evaluations, and was regularly awarded salary increases and bonuses.

But due to job-related stress in his final year of employment, Gary’s HIV symptoms became more frequent and severe, sending him to doctor appointments that made him occasionally miss work. When his manager repeatedly denied him time off for these appointments, he submitted an intermittent leave request under the federal Family & Medical Leave Act to take the necessary time off work to deal with his illness. The FMLA request was the first time that Gary disclosed his HIV-positive condition to his employer.

Almost immediately thereafter, the manager began to harshly and repeatedly criticize Gary’s job performance, labeling him as “useless.” As a result of heightened job related stress and his worsening symptoms, Gary went out on a disability leave for three months, and on the day he returned to work from the leave, the manager fired him.

Gary filed an ADA claim in federal court under and as the trial date in his case neared, the dispute was successfully resolved for just under $400,000.

In another recent case, “Donald” had been successfully employed as a middle school principal for almost 20 years in a small town in northern Michigan. At the beginning of a recent school year, he began suffering from depression and anxiety, to the point that one day he abruptly left school as he considered committing suicide. That same say, Donald entered inpatient and mental health therapy, and followed up with outpatient counseling.

Donald took a six-week leave, informing the school district of his mental condition and disability. At the end of the disability period, when his doctors released him to return to work, the district requested that Donald first submit to an examination by its psychologist. He complied, and the district’s psychologist also determined that he was no longer depressed or suicidal. Several weeks later, the district nevertheless informed Donald that it would not permit him to return to work. The district’s rationale was that teachers, parents, and students had become aware of Donald’s disability and several had expressed concerns about his return; unless he resigned, the district would fire him. Donald refused to resign and the district, as promised, terminated his employment.

Donald’s case was also litigated in federal court under the ADA, and was successfully resolved for just under $500,000.

Without the ADA, Gary and Donald might not have any basis to challenge their firings. Employers are becoming increasingly mindful that workplace decisions about disabled employees must be based upon each individual’s capacity to actually perform the job regardless of their disabilities.

As Michigan ages, and as more veterans with disabling injuries are rehabilitated, more of us will require the accommodations the ADA has made commonplace. Do you think the general public is aware of this? How might you persuade the able-bodied that they're going to need these accommodations someday?

Old stereotypes about disabled individuals and their inability to work are eroding and being discarded, with numerous examples:

  • Detroit Tigers great Kirk Gibson was recently diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease, and after taking a leave, he is returning to his very public role as a Tigers broadcaster.
  • Michigan recently elected Richard Bernstein to the state supreme court. Bernstein, who has been blind since birth, requires an assistant to read the numerous documents he must review to write important legal opinions.
  • Greg Abbott, paralyzed from the waist down and wheelchair-bound, was recently elected governor of Texas after successfully serving as the state’s attorney general.

Most important, in offices, stores, factories and other workplaces throughout Michigan and the rest of the country, we are observing more and more people with a physical or mental disability who are yet able to perform and overachieve in their jobs with some form of reasonable accommodation. While old stereotypes and prejudices do not disappear overnight, Americans’ attitudes and behavior relating to women, minorities, and the gay and lesbian community – as well as the disabled – are changing so as to better assure equal opportunities.

What's one thing you want the able-bodied population to know about the ADA?

Everyone must be evaluated on their own merits, not on the basis of old stereotypes and outdated practices. The ADA was intended to level the playing field for disabled persons.

At the same time the ADA recognizes that to perform certain jobs, disabled persons may require reasonable accommodations, which can take many different forms depending on the nature of the disability. Finally, able-bodied people must also realize that life is fragile, and an illness, accident or other unfortunate circumstance could disable anyone in an instant. They may require the protection the ADA provides.

Bridge welcomes guest columns from a diverse range of people on issues relating to Michigan and its future. The views and assertions of these writers do not necessarily reflect those of Bridge or The Center for Michigan.

If you are interested in submitting a guest commentary, please contact Monica WilliamsClick here for details and submission guidelines.

Like what you’re reading in Bridge? Please consider a donation to support our work!

We are a nonprofit Michigan news site focused on issues that impact all citizens. In an era of click bait and biased news, we focus on taking the time to learn both sides of a story before we post it. Bridge stories are always free, but our work costs money. If our journalism helps you understand and love Michigan more, please consider supporting our work. It takes just a moment to donate here.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Comments

Nancy Kaplan
Sun, 07/19/2015 - 7:37am
As the mother of a 38-year-old who was born with spina bidifa and has used a wheelchair to get around since he outgrew his baby stroller, I encourage this writer and others not to use the phrase "wheelchair-bound" to describe someone who uses a wheelchair. Wheelchairs provide independence, freedom of movement, and autonomy. They do not "bind" or imprison those who use them.
Nancy Kaplan
Sun, 07/19/2015 - 7:37am
As the mother of a 38-year-old who was born with spina bidifa and has used a wheelchair to get around since he outgrew his baby stroller, I encourage this writer and others not to use the phrase "wheelchair-bound" to describe someone who uses a wheelchair. Wheelchairs provide independence, freedom of movement, and autonomy. They do not "bind" or imprison those who use them.
Nancy Kaplan
Sun, 07/19/2015 - 7:39am
I am not sure why my comment showed up twice. That was not my intention. Also I need to correct a typo. My son's condition is spina bifida. It would be nice to have a "preview" option on this comment board so that the person making a comment could review it for errors (such as spelling mistakes) before submitting. Thanks as always to The Bridge for being such a great source of information and public advocacy in our state.
David Kotwicki
Sun, 07/19/2015 - 10:21am
Excellent article, and inspiring work by Mr. Swanson.
Matt
Mon, 07/20/2015 - 10:17am
Before we get all excited, what has happened to the labor participation rate for disabled, before and after since the ADA was passed? Are we seeing much to justify the national investment? Any third party statistics? Without concrete results, we only have a very expensive employment program for lawyers.
Michael Mandrick
Mon, 07/20/2015 - 3:00pm
An aspect of the ADA act directly affecting non disabled members of the public are requirements to build public sidewalks and sidewalk ramps to ADA standards . My knowledge comes from working in the Michigan Department of Transportation. When constructing new pedestrian walkways MDOT was directed to build theses sidewalks to grade (slope) and width standards as determined by the ADA. The standards were determined through research on the use of wheelchairs. As a delightful aside these new sidewalks are also much easier and pleasureably to walk upon..