Skip to main content
Michigan’s nonpartisan, nonprofit news source

Informing you and your community in 2025

Bridge Michigan’s year-end fundraising campaign is happening now! As we barrel toward 2025, we are crafting our strategy to watchdog Michigan’s newly elected officials, launch regional newsletters to better serve West and North Michigan, explore Michigan’s great outdoors with our new Outdoor Life reporter, innovate our news delivery and engagement opportunities, and much more!

Will you help us prepare for the new year? Your tax-deductible support makes our work possible!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate

Opinion | New student test scores are bad, but some ‘solutions’ are worse

This week’s release of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), commonly referred to as the Nation’s Report Card, has unfortunately shown that Michigan students continue to struggle academically relative to their national peers.

Josh Cowen
Josh Cowen is a professor of education policy at Michigan State University.

This is the first release of NAEP state-by-state data since the COVID-19 pandemic began, and kids in Michigan like in all states lost some academic ground.

The NAEP test focuses mainly on 4th and 8th grade math and reading every two years, with other grades and subjects on less frequent test administrations. Michigan kids have scored in the middle or in the bottom half of national trends for many years, including during multiple governors and legislative sessions.

This year in Michigan, 32 percent of 4th graders scored at or above proficient in math, and 29 percent at or above proficient in reading. Among 4th graders, students in 21 states had higher math scores than Michigan students, and 20 states had higher reading scores.

This year 25 percent of 8th graders scored at or above proficient in math, 28 percent at or above proficient in reading. Among 8th graders, students in 17 states had higher math scores, and in 9 states had higher reading scores.

To put that in perspective, in 2019 — the last time the test was administered, prior to the pandemic — 36 percent of 4th graders scored at or above proficient in math (below 29 other states), and 32 percent at or above proficient in reading (below 17 states). For 8th graders those numbers were 31 percent at or above proficient in math (below 21 states), 31 percent at or above proficient in reading (below 11 states).

What this means is that although Michigan like all states saw large drops in NAEP, our declines in math compared to pre-pandemic were at or even smaller than the national average. Our declines were larger than the national average in reading.

Is that something to celebrate? No, but it is something to remember.

It will be tempting to assign blame for these results. Some, like Republican gubernatorial nominee Tudor Dixon, have blamed Gov. Gretchen Whitmer for pandemic school closings, saying the state has to get “back to the basics” of math and reading instead of what she claims is an over-focus on sexuality and even pornography in Michigan schools.

But the only concrete policy plan she’s offered for education has been a Betsy DeVos-backed private school tuition tax credit that functions like a school voucher program. Her plan would allow wealthy donors to pay into a voucher vendor fund instead of paying what they owe in state taxes. That plan would cost around $500 million in its first year.

And because in other states more than 75 percent of voucher users were already in private schools, the Dixon plan would do nothing to help the vast majority of learners in our public school system.  As a matter of fact, in states like Indiana and Ohio, similar plans led to learning loss on par with what the pandemic caused later.

What does work? Well, money for one thing. Over the summer, Gov. Whitmer and Republicans in the state legislature together negotiated a historic investment in public schools — a generational budget achievement that brought new dollars to educator development, mental health services, child care and school infrastructure.

Study after study has shown the importance of public school spending for long term academic growth — and educational attainment like college enrollment. In fact, just this past spring, researchers at the University of Michigan showed that Michigan school districts that increased spending since 1994 had not only better educational outcomes, they had broader impacts like reducing crime as well.

We also have to remember that wherever they go to school, children are part of a larger community. The pandemic affected not only whether kids learned inside a building for a given amount of time, or whether they spent more time in a virtual classroom. The pandemic took the lives of parents, grandparents, and in some cases friends and teachers as well.

Michigan ranks 9th in COVID deaths per 100 residents. We’ve lost 39,000 Michiganders.

And for our children of color, or children struggling with gender identity or social acceptance because of their sexuality — or for kids struggling simply because they are young people and sometimes being a person is hard — the pandemic years have also brought new challenges and in some cases new attacks from public figures, including some who seek elected office to lead.

This week’s NAEP results reflect all of this, too, not just pencils and paper and textbooks and calculators in the classroom. There is no one single magic policy—not school choice, not book bans, and certainly not culture wars — that will improve outcomes for kids.

It’s going to have to start with renewed commitments to Michigan schools, both financially and as a matter of moral principle.

How impactful was this article for you?

Bridge welcomes guest columns from a diverse range of people on issues relating to Michigan and its future. The views and assertions of these writers do not necessarily reflect those of Bridge or The Center for Michigan. Bridge does not endorse any individual guest commentary submission. If you are interested in submitting a guest commentary, please contact David Zeman. Click here for details and submission guidelines.

Only donate if we've informed you about important Michigan issues

See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:

  • “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
  • “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
  • “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.

If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate Now