Opinion | Trump defunding WHO hurts health in Michigan and U.S.

A collective global gasp was heard when President Trump announced his intention to defund the World Health Organization. There is no shortage of opinions about the inherent risk to global health if the United States withdraws from the WHO. Yet, the potential implications of such a move on the global stage may not be immediately apparent at the domestic and local level. 

We would like to bring the lens closer to home to examine what that means for the Americas, and Michigan, at this critical moment.  

The WHO divides the world into six regions to improve and protect people’s health across the Americas. The Region of the Americas is composed of 52 countries including the United States. PAHO, or the Pan American Health Organization, predates the WHO and is now both the health authority of the inter-American system and the regional health office for the WHO. During the nearly 120 years since its inception, PAHO and its member countries in the Americas have achieved the eradication of polio and smallpox as well as the elimination of endemic transmission of measles and rubella. Life expectancy in the region has gained nearly three decades and there have been significant declines in maternal and infant morbidity and mortality. Defunding and departing from the WHO could place these advancements in jeopardy.

To achieve its mission, PAHO promotes long-term partnerships to stimulate innovation, research, and policy change related to public health for all people across the Americas. Many of these important partnerships have included academic and research institutions who work as part of a collaborative network to address public health concerns. Turning our backs on the WHO means turning our backs on the collaborations among scientists and health care providers that could lead to important advancements against emerging infections and viruses such as COVID-19.  

The University of Michigan played a special role in developing the first polio vaccine in 1954, but it is the WHO that has helped distribute the vaccine globally. Beginning in the late 1990s the WHO Regional Office for Europe and PAHO have taken a leading role in surveillance prevention recommendations for the West Nile Virus. When the virus appeared in New York City in 1999 and began to spread across the United States, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control benefitted from what was learned a few years before by the WHO European office. 

West Nile Virus is the leading cause of mosquito-borne disease in the continental United States.  In Michigan, outbreaks of the virus have occurred every summer since 2002. In 2002, Michigan had the second highest number of cases of West Nile Virus in the nation — with 644 cases and 21 deaths. In 2012 cases rose to their highest level since 2003 with 10 deaths in Wayne County alone.

Many people in Michigan receive a flu vaccine annually, yet never realize that components of the vaccine each year are selected based on information from the flu season in the Southern hemisphere (during our summer) which is shared through meetings convened by the WHO and its partners. Most recently, the WHO has helped bring together more than 150 countries to participate in COVID-19 vaccine development. The United States has chosen not to be involved in this endeavor, despite its status as the country with the most COVID-19 cases globally. This leaves Americans particularly vulnerable to emerging infections and viruses.  Emerging infectious diseases know no borders.

The U-M School of Nursing is one of only 17 nursing schools in the Americas to hold the designation of a PAHO/WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Clinical Training in Health Promotion Nursing. This trusted and valued partnership among nurses, midwives, other health professionals and policy experts from across the region allows us to learn from each other and improve the health and well-being of citizens throughout the region, including in the United States. It is this mutual learning that helps educate and prepare the healthcare providers serving on the front lines of the COVID-19 pandemic. Withdrawing from the WHO would negatively affect the collaboration of these institutions and thwart the innovation and research that has helped improve the health of people across the Americas. 

There are currently multiple activities underway in education, research, service and advocacy through partnerships established by U-M’s connections through the collaborating center. A few examples of this include an analysis of maternal mortality in Nicaragua; providing technical review of antenatal care curriculum for the WHO African region; and working with PAHO representatives from Guyana and Bolivia to identify best practices for maternity waiting homes in the region.  We also support the development of nursing and midwifery in the Americas and participate with partners to promote universal health care in the region. U-M students and faculty are an integral part of these endeavors, moving the science forward and becoming informed citizens of the world. Our mission in global education is strengthened by these collaborations with our colleagues at WHO.    

The work of PAHO is supported by contributions from member states, participating states and associate members. Currently, most of the non-payment to PAHO – approximately 67 percent of funds – are attributable to the United States. While Collaborating Centers receive no financial remuneration for services and consultations rendered, these funds support the work of PAHO’s dedicated staff to strengthen health sector capacity, provide surveillance during outbreaks of communicable disease and improve health for the most vulnerable among us. The defunding of WHO by our government directly impacts important work to improve health and access to care in the Americas. 

As we celebrate 2020 as the International Year of the Nurse and the Year of the Midwife — designated by the WHO to honor the 200th anniversary of Florence Nightingale’s birth and highlight the vital role of nurses and midwives in providing healthcare – we feel the toll the pandemic lays upon health workers around the world.  

Nurses have been at the forefront of the COVID-19 pandemic. It is estimated over 450,000 health care workers have been infected with COVID-19 and as of June 1, more than 600 nurses have died from the virus. Countries in the Americas are facing some of the worst outbreaks of COVID-19 in the world. This is not the time to turn our backs on our neighbors in the north and south. Working collaboratively strengthens. We are at a critical moment in history. It is time to show solidarity with the world.

The authors are with the University of Michigan, School of Nursing. Jody Lori PhD, RN, CNM, is director of the PAHO/WHO Collaborating Center; Megan Eagle RN, MS, MPH, FNP-BC, is deputy director of the PAHO/WHO Collaborating Center; Michelle Munro-Kramer PhD, CNM, FNP-BC, is director in the Office of Global Affairs; Nancy Lockhart, MSN, RN is project manager, Office of Global Affairs; Beste Windes, MBA is program manager, Office of Global Affairs.

Bridge welcomes guest columns from a diverse range of people on issues relating to Michigan and its future. The views and assertions of these writers do not necessarily reflect those of Bridge or The Center for Michigan. Bridge does not endorse any individual guest commentary submission.

If you are interested in submitting a guest commentary, please contact Monica WilliamsClick here for details and submission guidelines.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Mon, 08/10/2020 - 12:31pm

Thank you for this informative article about the critical work of the WHO, how participation and collaboration in global public health benefits us all, and the important role UM health researchers have played. The knee-jerk reaction to pull away from the WHO provides yet another reason for the importance of voting this November!

Mon, 08/10/2020 - 4:36pm

It is long past time that the United States provide the majority of funding for all the alphabet organizations that the US was a partner to. As an example, the NATO treaty was such that each country pay a certain percentage of GDP. The US paid far above their percentage while EU was paying far less than their percentage. Note again that this did not require equal pay, but equal percentage of a countries GDP. Yes, the US might end up paying the most, but all pay an equal percentage. If you want to argue for resumption of payments, argue for equal percentage of GDP which is what our president asked for. Trump will negotiate with anyone as long as the terms are equal, just like NAFTA became USMCA which all are heralding as a great treaty. He is the man that really everyone should vote for as he preaches and practices equality.

Mon, 08/10/2020 - 6:22pm

"Trump will negotiate with anyone". What about Congress?

Mon, 08/10/2020 - 5:05pm

Theres no reason for the United States to pay a billion dollars a year to the WHO if all that results are some findings and collaborations that are paid for by the individual members separately to the dues and that would be available through a much smaller scale operation. These nurses really make an awfully poor argument for remaining in the WHO. There are some things the WHO once did associated with largescale alleviation of hunger and disease at a time before the internet and before people understood more about the geopolitical nature of many of the problems that others could not do. In todays world they have become largely irrelevant.

middle of the mit
Tue, 08/11/2020 - 7:36pm


And with this argument we see what America has done with Workers Unions, not owner Associations, and where those Associations took their jobs and who they imported to work the UN unionized jobs that are why we have illegal immigrants!!!

Wanna keep goin'? Or don't you see the opening you left me? Let me point it out to you. Here it is!

[[[There are some things the WHO once did associated with largescale alleviation of hunger and disease at a time before the internet and before people understood more about the geopolitical nature of many of the problems that others could not do. In todays world they have become largely irrelevant.]]]]

The VERY same argument you use against unions, and teachers and any other workers you don't care for.......except yourselves.

Also.....WHO (pun intended) ARE the @real globalists?





Ohhh that's gotta hurt!

What is it Lincoln quoted from the Bible again? "A house, divided can not stand." What happens when you just outright go against everything you ever believed in and told the Nation would bring unbridled growth?

It stops when people realize the growth wasn't meant for them?


Kevin Grand
Mon, 08/10/2020 - 7:17pm

Are we talking about the same WHO which engaged in a deliberate disinformation/misinformation campaign at the behest of the CCP regarding the Wuhan virus?



The same organization that will never turn against its masters?


There is a very good reason for Pres. Trump to de-fund the WHO. These people are certainly NOT our "neighbors" by any stretch of the imagination!