Opinion | Whitmer's Healthy Climate Plan: a win for our air, water, health

In her boldest environmental policy to date, Gov. Gretchen Whitmer has launched Michigan's transition to a more healthy, low-carbon future that will also stimulate the economy and put people back to work.

As physicians who advocate for policies that address fossil fuel pollution, the Michigan Clinicians for Climate Action applauds Gov. Whitmer’s recent announcement of Michigan’s Healthy Climate Plan, which calls for carbon neutrality by 2050.

Elizabeth del Buono

Dr. Elizabeth DelBuono is the founder of and a physician advocate with Michigan Clinicians for Climate Action, a coalition of health professionals focused on addressing and preventing the adverse health effects of climate change. Dr. DelBuono practiced as a surgical pathologist for more than 30 years, mostly in Traverse City.

In her executive order, the governor created the Advisory Council on Climate Solutions, which will evaluate progress and monitor implementation of the climate plan. She wants to reduce harmful carbon emissions by decreasing our dependence on dirty fossil fuels and increasing the amount of clean renewable energy, like wind and solar, used to create electricity.

Currently, renewable energy accounts for only 12.5 percent of Michigan’s power generation mix – while coal, which is a major contributor to harmful air pollution, sits at 32 percent. According to data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the Midwest accounts for 22 percent of the nation’s carbon dioxide pollution. We know that outdated heavy industry and power plants continue to dot our shorelines and contribute to harmful air and water pollution to this very day.

The air we breathe, particularly for residents in metro Detroit, is filled with fine particulate carbon pollution, and toxins like ozone and mercury. Coal ash – what’s leftover when utilities burn coal to produce electricity – washes into our rivers, lakes and streams. Mercury ends up in our water, and then our fish – leading to serious problems for children and pregnant women.

Many people understand that air pollution can exacerbate asthma and chronic breathing conditions, but few are aware that air pollution contributes to a myriad of other health problems such as worsening of heart disease, an increased incidence of lung cancer, developmental delays in children, and dementia in the elderly. It is conservatively estimated that in the US, air pollution contributes to tens of thousands of premature deaths each year, while also increasing  the likelihood of dying from COVID-19.

The good news is that unlike warming greenhouse gases, which stay in the atmosphere for decades, air pollutants fall out of the air quickly once motor vehicles or other sources of carbon pollution stop emitting. We have seen this as the pandemic has stopped activities in many cities, and we have seen it historically when interstates have been closed due to construction. The quality of the air improves within hours to days and the need for health care interventions decrease in parallel. Worker productivity also improves and the amount of health care dollars saved cannot be underestimated.

While significant progress has been made since the U.S. Clean Water Act and U.S. Clean Air Act were signed, according to the American Lung Association’s 2020 State of the Air Report, nearly 5 in 10 people still live in communities in which air pollutants are frequently above levels that are considered safe by the EPA, and Detroit is listed as the 10th worst city in the country to live when looking at year-round air pollution.

Currently, we face many hurdles at the federal level to pass climate policies and realize the goals outlined in the Clean Air and Water Acts. That is why it is critical that states act. With Gov. Whitmer’s recent climate announcement, Michigan joins nine other states with carbon-neutrality initiatives that will catalyze the transition to a low carbon economy while at the same time creating new jobs, stimulating the economy, and protecting the health of our state.

Now is the time to support our governor as she implements this bold environmental and human health initiative.

Bridge welcomes guest columns from a diverse range of people on issues relating to Michigan and its future. The views and assertions of these writers do not necessarily reflect those of Bridge or The Center for Michigan. Bridge does not endorse any individual guest commentary submission.

If you are interested in submitting a guest commentary, please contact Monica WilliamsClick here for details and submission guidelines.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Comments

me
Fri, 10/16/2020 - 9:10am

I don't. understand what new jobs windmills and solar panels add, once they are built and in place, isn't the job over??? I also don't understand why we don't have more nuclear added, no carbon there. My electric bills are already ridiculous, don't know how the average family will be able to afford all of the additions in price. So carbon neutral will also mean elec. vehicles, so that's MORE elec. need right there, plus the cost of them also. AND no one has addressed the monster of the batteries when they are no longer usable, WHAT goes into them, and where will they end up??
Thanks for any info.

David Lawrence
Sat, 10/17/2020 - 1:50pm

It is not possible to have a totally wind and solar power grid. They are too intermittent and require a constant hydro, fossil fuel, or nuclear backup. As usual with this governor, this proposal is unrealistic.