Gov. Rick Snyder pitches plan to clean up Michigan’s polluted sites

Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder announces a proposal to fund cleanups at thousands of contaminated sites by raising landfill dumping fees. From left to right are Brent Forsberg, a Lansing-area real estate developer, and Evan Weiner, CEO of Edward C. Levy Company of Detroit and chair of the governor’s 21st Century Infrastructure Commission. (Bridge photo by Jim Malewitz)

LANSING — Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder unveiled a proposal Tuesday to replenish funding for cleanups at thousands of polluted sites across Michigan — an effort that would require citizens to chip in a few extra dollars per year.

The Republican wants to increase state fees for dumping at landfills, which he called incredibly low.

Speaking in a century-old manufacturing site that developers plan to transform into an apartment complex, Snyder said Michigan needs a long-term solution to clean and redevelop sites contaminated by from a history of manufacturing, mining and other heavy industries.

Related: Here’s where Michigan governor candidates stand on funding toxic cleanups
Related:
Michigan has 7,300 toxic sites. Money for cleanups is almost gone.

The plan, which would require legislative approval, would generate about $79 million through raised fees for solid waste disposal, Snyder said. The money would primarily fund cleanups, but also fund efforts to boost recycling, and improve water quality and state parks.

Michigan’s current fee, 36 cents per ton, makes it one of the world’s most attractive places for out-of-staters to dump their trash, Snyder said. Toronto, for instance, sent its household trash to a landfill in Wayne County for years.

“That’s not a contest I’m aspiring to win.”

Other Great Lakes state charge far higher rates, Snyder said. Under his plan, Michigan’s fee would match Ohio’s fee of $4.75 per ton.

About half of the revenue raised would come from out-of-state and Michigan businesses, with households bearing the rest of the burden.

Since the average Michigan family tosses about a ton of trash per year, it would cost an extra $4.75 each year, Snyder said. That’s about the price of a McDonald’s double quarter pounder with cheese.

“I’ve been very proud of our record reducing taxes,” Snyder said. “But at some point it’s important we pay our fair share, too.”

Snyder is making his pitch as one of the biggest sources for dealing with contamination has mostly dried up: the Clean Michigan Initiative, approved by voters in 1998.

The $675 million bonding program also benefited parks, but most of its funding went toward cleaning and redeveloping polluted sites.

The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality is tracking about 7,300 contaminated sites. Some 3,000 of the polluted sites are likely “orphans,” meaning the original polluter is long gone, leaving taxpayers solely responsible for the cleanup.

MORE COVERAGE: Find PFAS chemical threats to Michigan drinking water near your town

Heidi Grether, the DEQ’s director, said Tuesday her agency had redeveloped more than 1,000 polluted sites through the Clean Michigan Initiative, curbing public health hazards and putting properties back on local tax roles.

She called the effort “vital to our economic strength in the state.”

Snyder called a pay-as-you-go approach more prudent than pushing another bond that would run up state debt.  

He unveiled his proposal on a sprawling brick property outside of downtown Lansing. It once hosted a variety of manufacturing companies, including one that built parts for refrigerator trucks in partnership with Ransom E. Olds, the namesake of Oldsmobile.

Brent Forsberg, a Lansing-area real estate developer, is planning to transform the site into an apartment complex, but first must address air quality problems and other hazards — such as asbestos — before constructing 160 units in the building. He said he was applying for state aid to do so.

“Being able to have the programs to reconnect these buildings to our cities is important,” he said.

To make his proposal a reality, Snyder, who is term-limited and in his final year in office, will need buy in from a Republican-controlled legislature that has increasingly gone its own way on taxing and environmental issues.

Here’s how Snyder’s $79 million annual proposal would break down:

  • $45 million to clean up 300 sites annually and address emerging contaminants such as PFAS and vapor intrusion
  • $9 million to improve solid waste planning for local governments
  • $15 million in an effort to triple Michigan’s recycling rate
  • $5 million for water quality monitoring
  • $5 million to improve state parks

Like what you’re reading in Bridge? Please consider a donation to support our work!

It takes time, money, and hard work to inform Michigan readers and leaders with substantive, in-depth, future-oriented news and analysis. If you value our journalism, please consider a one-time donation or a monthly contribution. It takes just a moment to donate here. Please join the thousands of Bridge readers who are helping grow and sustain our nonprofit, in-depth public service journalism in Michigan.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Comments

John Saari
Wed, 01/31/2018 - 9:31am

Clean ASAP but always look for retribution and cost sharing, take over ownership and clean it up good enough to walk on.

Marco Menzes
Thu, 04/26/2018 - 9:55am

It's a start, but doesn't address the problem at its root. Legislation should include a ban on non-recycleable packaging, incentives to replace plastics with biodegradable materials and to promote composting. Prevention of orphan sites should be addressed during the permitting process by realistic assessment of potential risks to the environment, and the requirement of remediation bonds to cover those potential future costs. Holding polluters accountable, however, is not likely happen under the current Lansing regime.