After ACLU lawsuit, Detroit City Clerk rushes ballots to voters

Detroit voters at Rouge Park’s voting center, one of 23 throughout the city for the November election. (BridgeDetroit photo by Ralph Jones)

As many as 70,000 ballot applications for the November election sat in the Detroit city clerk’s office for three weeks in September because it failed to send out absentee ballots on-time, the American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan alleged in a lawsuit filed this month.

Now, under a new agreement, Detroit City Clerk Janice Winfrey has pledged to process all applications within 24 hours of receipt. 

“What we’ve been doing as of late is whenever a request comes in, we are sending that ballot out overnight,” Winfrey said at a news conference Thursday. “In addition to that, we also will hand-deliver.”

According to the Michigan Legislature, a City Clerk has to mail or personally deliver absentee ballots to voters immediately. The Michigan Secretary of State directs local clerks to issue absentee ballots within 24 hours of receipt of an absent voter application. 

But, according to the ACLU, as of Sept. 23, the clerk’s office was in possession of 200,000 absentee ballot applications, but data from the Secretary of State’s office showed that, as of Oct. 12, the office had issued only 132,879 ballots.

Marianne Yared McGuire, 79, a Detroit voter, requested an absentee ballot in early October. 

McGuire says she submitted absentee ballot applications in previous elections and typically received a response within two to three days. This time she realized it had been more than a week and had not heard from the city clerk’s office.

“I panicked,” said McGuire who did not want to vote in-person at the polls on Nov. 3 because she’s afraid of contracting COVID-19 or encountering violence or intimidation at the polls. 

McGuire decided to vote early instead at Balduck Park, one of the city’s 23 satellite voting locations. This week, however, her absentee ballot was overnighted to her in the mail. 

“I figured I had fallen through the cracks but it cost them $26.35 to send the ballot. You just wonder how many others fell through the cracks too.”

Dan Korobkin, legal director at the ACLU of Michigan, said the goal of the lawsuit was to get people like McGuire ballots before Election Day.

“The purpose of the lawsuit and the agreement was to make sure the backlog would be cleared within 24 hours. That was on October 21,” he said. “We are now receiving daily reports, as required by the agreement, to document that they are processing ballot applications.”

As part of the lawsuit settlement, the clerk’s office will also be extending the hours of its voter hotline to 9 a.m. until 9 p.m. every day, to ensure a smooth voting process. The office said it is prepared to respond to all voters’ telephone messages within 24 hours.   

Voters can check the status of their application online and if the requested ballot has not yet been sent, the voter can notify the clerk by calling 313-876-0190 or the ACLUat 866-OUR-VOTE.  

The city clerk must receive a request for an absent voter ballot online or by mail no later than 5 p.m. Friday. Ballots must be received by the voter’s city clerk by 8 p.m. on Election Day to be counted. 

Voters who haven’t received their ballot can call the clerk’s office to find out the status of their ballot or go to their clerk’s office to request and submit a ballot in person to vote absentee until Monday. 

Daniel Baxter, of the Detroit City Clerk’s office, says voting at the polls on Nov. 3 is an option. 

“If they miss those opportunities, then they certainly should go to the precinct and vote on Election Day,” said Baxter. 

As of Oct. 28, more than 173,000 absentee ballots have been issued in Detroit and 123,783 have been returned. 

This article is made possible through Votebeat, a nonpartisan reporting project covering local election integrity and voting access. This article is available for reprint under the terms of Votebeat’s republishing policy.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Fri, 10/30/2020 - 3:30pm

We keep hearing about all the concerns for voter suppression, and doesn't not providing requested absentee ballots in effect become voter suppression?
Would it be surprising if Michigan is won by Trump again, albeit, by a small margin that there would be lawsuits challenging the voting in Michigan? If not all Detroiters who requested ballots didn't receive them, couldn't that be part of the reasoning use by lawyers [such as the ACLU or the Democratic Party] to request the Court overturn the results of voting in Detroit?
That would mean that a Democrat dominated city [Detroit] did/didn't do things that could be responsible for providing the Democrat Party or surrogates justifications for challenging the Michigan election. That reminds me of a case in back in the 2000 election in Florida where Democrats had control of the election process/counting and voting count was challenged in the Courts by the Democrats.
Democrats control the voting/counting process and their actions/in actions gave the Democrats justification to challenge the process/results in the Courts.
We already know that our Democrat Governor has tried to usurp powers of the Legislature and been told she can't by the Courts, we know our Sec of State, who has control of the voting process, has tried to unilaterally change the voting rules has been told by the Courts that she doesn't have such authority, we know that even our Att General has by told by the Courts that actions/interpretations she has made were wrong and voided.
Hmmm, the 3 highest ranking elected officials in Michigan have been willing to doing things that the Courts found outside the laws of Michigan, and we have a City whose elected officials are Democrats are showing they are doing/not doing that effect voting of their residents that the Courts have order to be changed. Should we be surprised if that results disappoint [not enough votes for Harris/Biden to overcome voting for Trump outside the City] the Democrats that they will challenge the results/election because of what is done/not done in Detroit?

I my City Clerk and how she administers the voting/counting, but I will be going to the polls to vote where I know how they verify who I am before I vote, and the machine [that has been used for years] will scan my vote before I leave so any glitches can be addressed immediately.