Appeals court: Michigan workers can seek damages for false fraud claims

Royal Oak attorney Jennifer Lord, who represents the workers falsely accused of fraud, said the court ruling reflects a “widespread recognition that the agency engaged in egregious conduct in the way it treated these false fraud claims.”

A lawsuit brought on behalf of thousands of Michigan workers falsely accused of unemployment fraud can proceed on constitutional grounds and seek damages, a Michigan Court of Appeals panel ruled Thursday.

The Michigan Supreme Court previously ruled in April that the suit could move forward, but it returned the case to the appeals court to consider whether an individual can sue the state for monetary damages for violation of their constitutional rights.

In affirming that right, a three-judge panel found the state’s actions in falsely accusing unemployed workers of fraud as alleged in the lawsuit — violated the claimants’ due process rights under the state Constitution.

The court also ruled that plaintiffs were entitled to collect damages for state actions it called “egregious.”

“In simple terms, the alleged disturbing facts of this lawsuit would call out for such a remedy,” it ruled.

Plaintiffs lawyers estimate that up to 40,000 people were damaged by the state actions under the administration of GOP Governor Rick Snyder, which stemmed from a computer system the state installed in 2013 to automate unemployment insurance claims.

That was a year after the Unemployment Insurance Agency laid off 400 full- and part-time employees - a third of its workforce. In essence, the computer system and its algorithms replaced human beings, presiding as judge and jury over tens of thousands of unemployment cases.

The result: Tens of thousands lost benefits, in many cases, they said, without any notice.

Jennifer Lord, the Royal Oak attorney representing the plaintiffs, described the ruling to Bridge Magazine on Thursday as “pretty amazing. As a practical matter, it says to me there is widespread recognition that the agency engaged in egregious conduct in the way it treated these false fraud claims.”

“I hope the agency will do the right thing and allow this case to be remanded to the Court of Claims so we can start working to help these people rebuild their lives.”

The Court of Claims is a trial court of statewide, limited jurisdiction to hear and determine all civil actions filed against the State of Michigan and its agencies.

Senate Minority Leader Jim Ananich, D-Flint, issued a statement about the ruling: “These wrongful accusations of fraud have ruined people’s lives. Since 2013, countless victims have reached out to my office with stories of going into debt, having to declare bankruptcy, and losing their homes. What Gov. Snyder’s agency did to these families is downright criminal, and the plaintiffs deserve their day in court.”

 A spokesperson for UIA declined comment on the ruling.

In 2017, for instance, Detroit resident Jason Doss told Bridge that UIA had already taken $14,000 from his bank account, on a state fraud finding that he owed a total of more than $84,000.

Doss said he learned he was being penalized for fraud only after he got his first garnished check in March 2015. The garnishment appeared to be for unemployment payments he received relating to a manufacturing job six years ago – payments he had already litigated against UIA before an administrative law judge and won on appeal.

Michigan’s unemployment system, which pays out $1.7 billion in benefits a year, is funded by taxes on employers for workers who are laid off and meet state standards for length of employment and earnings.

Due to the UIA computer system, called MiDAS, state fraud cases soared, more than tripling, from 7,164 in 2013 to 23,385 in 2014 and 25,472 in 2015.

A 2017 agency internal review in December found that nearly 21,000 workers — 93 percent of the cases reviewed — had been falsely accused of fraud over a 22-month period.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Comments

Art Puls
Thu, 12/05/2019 - 5:58pm

I had to hire a lawyer and go before a judge to get my fines waved. I was still out all the unemployment funds I COULD have been earning during that time, plus lawyer fees. Where do I sign up for this?

Kevin Grand
Thu, 12/05/2019 - 6:57pm

"Plaintiffs lawyers estimate that up to 40,000 people were damaged by the state actions under the administration of GOP Governor Rick Snyder, which stemmed from a computer system the state installed in 2013 to automate unemployment insurance claims."

It's interesting that the suit only names the UIA and no one else.

Any reason why that was?

I am curious why Rick Snyder wasn't named on that suit as well?

This DID happen under his watch.

Otto Stockmeyer
Fri, 12/06/2019 - 10:01am

When reporting on a Court of Appeals decision, particularly if you quote from it, please identify the members of the three-judge panel that issued the decision. They are public officials; if their decision is noteworthy, their names should be noted. https://info.cooley.edu/blog/name-those-judges

pierredeboe
Sun, 12/08/2019 - 8:55am

Cleaning up Snyders legacy of corruption. Too bad he skated from Flint water crisis.