Dana Nessel appeals unemployment fraud case to Michigan Supreme Court

Jennifer Lord

Jennifer Lord, the Royal Oak attorney representing the plaintiffs, called the state appeal “disappointing.” (Courtesy photo)

A month after a Michigan Court of Appeals panel ruled thousands of Michigan workers falsely accused of unemployment fraud can seek damages, the state is asking the Michigan Supreme Court to reject that right.

In the lawsuit known as Bauserman v. Unemployment Insurance Agency, the state argues that federal case law has moved court-ordered damages in such cases toward leaving those remedies to legislative bodies.

"This court should follow suit," the appeal says. "Any other action would not be faithful to the separation of powers."

Jennifer Lord, the Royal Oak attorney representing the plaintiffs, called the state appeal “disappointing.”

But she said it continues a strategy it has employed for years.

“This has been their tactic all along, to delay and delay and delay. It is just really disappointing, because in most cases when a party appeals, they have a good-faith argument they didn’t do anything wrong.

“The state has admitted it was wrong – they took money that wasn’t theirs to take. To keep defending this is pretty shocking.”

Kelly Rossman-McKinney, spokesperson for Attorney General Dana Nessel said in a statement: “This appeal was necessary because Michigan has no case law on how or when a court can award money damages in a case where the plaintiffs allege a violation of their due process rights.  We certainly want to get this right. —that is, we want  to pay an appropriate amount to those individuals who have truly been harmed because of the failure to receive notice and an opportunity to be heard [before the Agency issued its fraud adjudication.

“To do so, we seek guidance from the Supreme Court of this state.”

Plaintiffs lawyers estimate up to 40,000 people were damaged by the state actions under the administration of GOP Gov.  Rick Snyder, which stemmed from a computer system the state installed in 2013 to automate unemployment insurance claims.

That was a year after the UIA laid off 400 full- and part-time employees, a third of its workforce. In essence, the computer system and its algorithms replaced humans. Tens of thousands lost benefits, in many cases, without any notice.

An agency internal review in December found that nearly 21,000 workers – 93 percent of the cases reviewed – had been falsely accused of fraud over a 22-month period.

In early December, the Court of Appeals panel found the state violated due process rights by falsely accusing unemployed workers of fraud. The court also ruled that plaintiffs are entitled to collect damages for state actions it called “egregious.”

“In simple terms, the alleged disturbing facts of this lawsuit would call out for such a remedy,” the court ruled.

But the state appeal argues that a procedural due process violation does not justify an award of monetary damages.

"This court should grant leave to consider this issue and should ultimately conclude that separation-of-powers principles require our Legislature to determine whether it is appropriate to impose damage remedies for an alleged violation of our Constitution – and if so, in what circumstances,” the appeal reads.

“If left to stand, the Court of Appeals' decision would allow for the violation of the separation-of-powers doctrine by permitting courts to authorize sizable awards of money damages without legislative authorization."

Lord argued there’s no need for the Legislature to determine whether UIA clients are entitled to monetary damages. 

She noted the Michigan Constitution says that no person can be “deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law.”

“That is explicitly stated,” she said.


Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Fri, 01/17/2020 - 8:20am

So what is the difference between the Michigan democrats and the MI republicans??? NOTHING!!!! We in Michigan DO NOT have a democrat party jut closet republicans!!!

Paul Jordan
Fri, 01/17/2020 - 8:47am

The state acted with depraved indifference towards these people by using its tremendous power to deny them their rights to unemployment compensation. The Snyder administration did their very best to ignore the people they'd harmed, perhaps hoping they'd quietly crawl off into a corner and die.

Dana Nessel is absolutely, totally, wrong in this case. She has the opportunity to establish case law in the favor of people steam-rolled by the state by NOT appealing the ruling!

innocent bystander
Fri, 01/17/2020 - 4:39pm

Perhaps she trying to force the legislators to take a position on what they and the previous governor created.

Fri, 01/17/2020 - 5:08pm

Glad to see this covered in Bridge. I have not seen it anywhere else. It is way past time for the state to do the right thing here and I am disappointed to see our Democratic AG wants to kick this back to the courts. Please keep covering this story.

Kevin Grand
Sat, 01/18/2020 - 4:17pm

An AG who wants to use her office to go and create a Thought Crime Unit, now has an epiphany and wants to start doing things right?

What is there to do?

It's already been acknowledged that Lansing has screwed up big time.

The only thing these delays accomplish is to drive up the final amount of damages which will eventually need to be paid out.

Instead of running out the clock on this case, AG Nessel should be looking at filing criminal charges against those responsible for this occurring in the first place (Rick Snyder). Seizing their assets would also be a meaningful step towards offsetting the cost to Michigan Taxpayers.

The clock is ticking...

Oh Wow!
Sun, 01/19/2020 - 11:50am

Unbelievable. Truly so and completely along with utterly disappointing.

Arthur Payne
Sat, 02/01/2020 - 4:49pm

How can I stop getting this bullshit on my news feed. Bridge is pure Bs I don’t want it on my news feed.

james white
Wed, 02/12/2020 - 5:55pm

Yea i guess i know now why they say i owe 12000 for the 4000 i got 6 years ago and still claim i owe even tho i never frauded and when i talk to them they charge me more and wont fix it at all