Michigan closing budget gap with layoffs and cuts to roads, PFAS cleanups

The coronavirus pandemic created a huge budget hole for Michigan that lawmakers filled with funding cuts to roads, layoffs, savings and federal grants. (File photo)

State leaders passed a deal Wednesday and Thursday to cut $2.2 billion from the state’s nearly $60 billion budget to make up for a dramatic loss in revenue due to the coronavirus pandemic. 

The winners: Schools and local governments, who received a boost through federal money including a one-time payment of $500 for teachers; a net increase of $175 per pupil and $150 million for local governments. Most of the money for schools is for coronavirus response.

The losers: PFAS and lead remediation ($4.8 million cut); implementing changes to Healthy Michigan ($2.5 million cut); roads and bridges ($13 million) and the state’s workforce. Most of the savings came from temporary layoffs and hiring freezes.

“Every budget is a statement of priorities. In the face of unprecedented and unforeseen challenges within 2020, the budget agreement before you reflects our shared commitment to schools, local government and everyone affected by COVID-19,” said Sen. Jim Stamas, R-Midland, chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, on the Senate floor Wednesday. 

More tough decisions lie ahead: This deal balances the state budget through the end of September, when the next fiscal year begins and the state faces another $3 billion budget shortfall. The new budget was supposed to be completed by July, but it was postponed due to the virus.

The shortfalls are because tax collection fell dramatically as the state’s economy contracted amid the pandemic and more than 1 million state residents were left jobless.

The budget agreement uses up the lion’s share of the pandemic relief money sent to Michigan from the federal government through the CARES Act. After this budget deal, only $94 million are left from the $3 billion received. It must be spent by the end of the year.

The bipartisan budget deal was negotiated by the administration of Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, a Democrat, and GOP legislative leaders, including Stamas and House Appropriations Chairman Shane Hernandez of Port Huron.

Whitmer’s budget director, Chris Kolb, said the deal protects “public education, health care, our local communities and critical services our residents depend on."

Among the highlights:

  • Schools will get an extra $256 million in funding to help prepare for the upcoming school year, and teachers willing to remain on the job will qualify for a collective $53 million in hazard pay. 
  • An executive order from Whitmer cuts approximately $620 million in state spending but utilizes $475 million in federal funding for state police and the department of corrections, resulting in a cut of about $145 million.
  • The Department of Health and Human Services, the state's largest department, will see its current-year budget cut by $36 million. About half that savings are from hiring freezes and temporary layoffs. 

The Whitmer administration began temporary layoffs and furloughs for state employees in April. It appears the budget deal incorporates those savings and will not require additional layoffs at this time. 

Budget officials in May lowered revenue projections for the current fiscal year by $3.2 billion. But enhanced Medicaid payments from the federal government softened some of that blow, and the state had $788 million in leftover funds to help close the gap to $2.2 billion.  

Under the deal, the state will spend $350 million from its nearly $1.2 billion Budget Stabilization Fund, otherwise known as the rainy day fund, leaving it with a balance of $836 million. 

That’s one reason why Sen. Jeff Irwin, D-Ann Arbor, was the only senator to vote against the package. The deal passed unanimously in the House.

“It’s betting on the fact that the fed government is going to come up with more relief and if they do, it might make this compromise a little more reasonable in my mind,” Irwin told Sinclair Broadcast Group Wednesday. “But until Congress acts, I think it’s a mistake for us to burn up all our dry tinder when we don’t know what Congress is going to do.”

The Whitmer administration continues to urge the federal government to provide additional aid to states and local governments. With key provisions of the CARES act soon to expire, including $600 a week in Pandemic Unemployment Assistance for the jobless, Congress is currently debating parameters of another relief package. 

The budget deal represents a rare instance of bipartisan cooperation this year, which has been marked by feuds over Whitmer's executive power and her handling of the coronavirus pandemic. 

Michigan has to balance its budget for fiscal year 2021 by the end of September in order to avoid a government shutdown, which nearly occurred last year during a tense feud between GOP leadership and Whitmer, who used a record number of line-item vetoes and transfers to reshape a budget crafted by the Legislature. 

And that was before the global pandemic. 

"We still have a lot of challenges moving forward," said Rep. Jon Hoadley, D-Kalamazoo, minority vice chair of the House Appropriations Committee. “We have a whole set of challenges ahead for us next fiscal year, and we're going to need some help to get that done, but hopefully with the spirit of bipartisanship, we can start on the right foot."

Editor's note: This story was changed at 8:05 p.m. July 22 to update the budget process as it worked its way through the Legislature. 

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Comments

Anonymous
Wed, 07/22/2020 - 6:32pm

Our economy is in shambles because fake Americans won't wear a mask.

Tom Smith
Thu, 07/23/2020 - 8:02am

That's nonsense

CharlieD
Fri, 07/24/2020 - 6:06pm

Correction... Our economy is in shambles because of the incompetent politicans that we voted into power.
Wait a minute... There's little power here. The Governator's orders are all illegal....
This must be the twilight zone.

Tucker
Sun, 07/26/2020 - 9:23am

Why do you believe our economy is in shambles because "fake Americans" won't wear a mask? I'm also frustrated by where our economy has landed and concerned about the upcoming school year. Would you mind providing your thoughts on why wearing a mask would have saved our economy? Even countries like Taiwan that had a strict adherence to mask wearing, contact tracing, etc is forecasting GDP contraction. I'm also confused by how your comment furthers the topics discussed in this article.

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-51706225
https://www.cdc.gov.tw/en/Disease/SubIndex/

Matt G
Thu, 07/23/2020 - 9:08am

It's totally unacceptable that schools have to plan for the next year without a budget being completed until September. Call your legislators and demand the deadline be changed or school boards will just have to vote to start after the budget is done.

One thing also not mentioned by Bridge here is that the school per pupil funding was cut, so that extra federal COVID money replaces the cut. Problem is that new CARES Act money has restrictions whereas the per pupil money doesn't. I'm not sure how you can label K12 schools as "winners" here when all they've done is play shell games with federal CARES act dollars replacing state level cuts. There has been no overall change in funding, and added restrictions that extend into future years where I'm sure there will be a politically twisted battle about returning to normal described as an "increase". Not to mention that schools have massively increased costs during the pandemic. PPE for staff, tech purchases for virtual/hybrid learning models, WiFi hotspots for disconnected families or teachers that live in remote areas with poor internet, and other costs. We're still looking at possible staff layoffs, which would just add to the unemployment problems in the state. It's gonna cost taxpayers either way.

Also, the legislature saw fit a few years ago to lump some community college and public university funding into the school aid fund, so now the discussion of K12 budgets are complicated by that fact as well.

The state legislature has a lot of work to do.

water2Wine
Sun, 07/26/2020 - 12:00pm

Over the last several years, teachers have taken pay cut after pay cut after pay cut after pay cut. It is time for the Michigan legislative people including those in Congress and the House to begin taking their turns. They have become all powerful in this State and as such should show their courage and comradery at this time when so many of our Michiganders are suffering in their unsureness as to their jobs, homes, groceries, healthcare, and sanity.