Michigan committee approves health warning labels for marijuana

Rep. Daire Rendon, R-Lake City, said legislation requiring warning labels for marijuana is about “making the consumer stop and think.”

October 2019: Opinion | Marijuana retail bans stunt Michigan's economic growth

LANSING –  The House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday approved bills that would require labels on marijuana indicating its health risks for pregnant mothers.  

“This is a brand new product that’s going out … and a lot of people automatically think ‘Wow it’s legal, it’s going to be safe,’” said Rep. Daire Rendon, R-Lake City, one of the bill’s sponsors. “So we felt it was very important that people understand there are health implications for using products like this.”

The legislation would require all cannabis be packaged with a label reading: “Warning: Use by pregnant or breastfeeding women, or by women planning to become pregnant, may result in fetal injury, preterm birth, low birth weight, or developmental problems for the child.”

The legislation would also require both adult-use and medical marijuana dispensaries to make pamphlets available including safety information about cannabis use by minors. 

The lawmakers chose to focus on fetal development after hearing from pediatricians who testified about marijuana’s impact on the juvenile brain, Rendon said. There is research that shows that both marijuana smoke and cigarette smoke can increase the chance of developmental problems for babies and that marijuana use during pregnancy can make it harder for children to pay attention or learn as they grow older.

Rep. Beau LaFave, R-Iron Mountain, voted against the bill. He said that while he doesn’t believe pregnant women should use marijuana, he opposed the legislation because he believes the more products require warning labels, the more it dilutes the credibility of the warning. 

“Just because something’s unhealthy doesn’t mean the government needs to tell everybody about it or require that label be on it,” LaFave said. “If you warn everyone about everything, the warnings themselves become less helpful.”

It would be preferable that all consumers do research on the potential effects of products before buying them, Rendon said, but in reality, few people do. 

“That’s what this is all about, making the consumer stop and think,” she said.

The state Marijuana Regulatory Agency supported the bills. Agency spokesman David Harns said that state packaging rules already require a label warning consumers to keep it away from children and not to drive under the influence. 

The Michigan Cannabis Industry Association was neutral on the bills. Spokesman Josh Hovey said the group was glad several changes were made to the legislation, including a clarification that businesses could make pamphlets available but weren’t required to hand one out with every purchase. 

MCIA “supports warning labels when they are backed by thorough scientific data and we don't believe there is enough research available at this point,” Hovey said via email. “Since some degree of caution is reasonable, we are neutral on the bill.”

The bills will next move to the House floor for a vote before being considered in the Senate.

Facts matter. Trust matters. Journalism matters.

If you learned something from the story you're reading please consider supporting our work. Your donation allows us to keep our Michigan-focused reporting and analysis free and accessible to all. All donations are voluntary, but for as little as $1 you can become a member of Bridge Club and support freedom of the press in Michigan during a crucial election year.

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Donate now

Comment Form

Add new comment

Dear Reader: We value your thoughts and criticism on the articles, but insist on civility. Criticizing comments or ideas is welcome, but Bridge won’t tolerate comments that are false or defamatory or that demean, personally attack, spread hate or harmful stereotypes. Violating these standards could result in a ban.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.


Jim Smokietreat
Tue, 08/27/2019 - 9:18pm

There is zero scientific evidence that THC, or any part of the marijuana plant, causes any biological damage to a mother or a developing fetus. Zero poof exists and the CDC's website even admits this, by using the words "may cause" harm. The CDC might as well say campfire smoke "may cause" harm, because we have scientific proof it actually does. This is just more fear mongering around a flower that is as natural and healthy as an apple. Mom, use this God given natural cure, your baby will incur no harm. Cigarettes, alchohol, and cleaning chemicals: scientific proof exists that these WILL harm you AND your fetus/baby! Politicans are just bribed to protect big pharma profits...legal heroin anyone?

Wed, 09/04/2019 - 10:36am

Mr. Smokietreat --- Did you follow the link in the article with 17 references that talk about the health risks associated with marijuana. Clearly you would just like ignore the downside of marijuana use to promote your own agenda. If you want to use go ahead. You will be accountable for your own actions. But, just because you say there is no harm, does not make it true. Yes --- mothers should be advised to avoid all substances that "may cause" harm to the baby they are blessed to carry, including marijuana.

Alex Sagady
Wed, 08/28/2019 - 2:58am

This article does not say if Gov. Whitmer's MDHHS weighed in or not on this legislation.....that is important information.

abe bubush
Wed, 08/28/2019 - 9:06am

What can they put on the label?: "Due to a total lack of research done on the effects of marihuana, we can only resort to panic and disinformation and say that it's bad."

Gary Lea
Wed, 10/09/2019 - 8:35am

Michigan's House Judiciary Committee presumes that soon-to-be mothers will not be blind or dyslexic and will be literate. What about research into marijuana's effects upon male sperm generation or offspring resulting from such conception? Do alcoholic beverages sold in Michigan require such labeling?